Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995) 0.07
    0.06683179 = product of:
      0.10024768 = sum of:
        0.039466683 = weight(_text_:j in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039466683 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
        0.060781 = product of:
          0.121562 = sum of:
            0.121562 = weight(_text_:van in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121562 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24662332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044224758 = queryNorm
                0.49290553 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
  2. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.04
    0.039890848 = product of:
      0.059836272 = sum of:
        0.04186074 = weight(_text_:j in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04186074 = score(doc=2421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
        0.017975532 = product of:
          0.035951063 = sum of:
            0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035951063 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044224758 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  3. Koblitz, J.: Methoden des Referierens von Dokumenten (1964) 0.03
    0.032888904 = product of:
      0.098666705 = sum of:
        0.098666705 = weight(_text_:j in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098666705 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.70213413 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.03
    0.031717032 = product of:
      0.047575545 = sum of:
        0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029600013 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
        0.017975532 = product of:
          0.035951063 = sum of:
            0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035951063 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044224758 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  5. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.03
    0.026430858 = product of:
      0.039646287 = sum of:
        0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666676 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
        0.01497961 = product of:
          0.02995922 = sum of:
            0.02995922 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02995922 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044224758 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
  6. Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987) 0.03
    0.026311122 = product of:
      0.078933366 = sum of:
        0.078933366 = weight(_text_:j in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078933366 = score(doc=2738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Hartley, J.: Do structured abstracts take more space? : And does it matter? (2002) 0.02
    0.023022233 = product of:
      0.069066696 = sum of:
        0.069066696 = weight(_text_:j in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069066696 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Reischer, J.; Lottes, D.; Meier, F.; Stirner, M.: Evaluation von Summarizing-Systemen : Kommerzielle und freie Systeme im Vergleich (2010) 0.02
    0.018604774 = product of:
      0.05581432 = sum of:
        0.05581432 = weight(_text_:j in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05581432 = score(doc=492,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  9. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997) 0.01
    0.013155561 = product of:
      0.039466683 = sum of:
        0.039466683 = weight(_text_:j in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039466683 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998) 0.01
    0.013155561 = product of:
      0.039466683 = sum of:
        0.039466683 = weight(_text_:j in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039466683 = score(doc=2999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.01
    0.009986407 = product of:
      0.02995922 = sum of:
        0.02995922 = product of:
          0.05991844 = sum of:
            0.05991844 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05991844 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044224758 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  12. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995) 0.01
    0.009866672 = product of:
      0.029600013 = sum of:
        0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029600013 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.01
    0.009866672 = product of:
      0.029600013 = sum of:
        0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029600013 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.8, S.728-730 (J.-E. Mai); Indexer 21(1999) no.3, S.148 (P.F. Booth); Managing information 6(1999) no.1, S.48 (S.T. Clarke); Electronic library 17(1999) no.3, S.193 (F. Parry)
  14. Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences (2009) 0.01
    0.009866672 = product of:
      0.029600013 = sum of:
        0.029600013 = weight(_text_:j in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029600013 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Montesi, M.; Mackenzie Owen, J.: Revision of author abstracts : how it is carried out by LISA editors (2007) 0.01
    0.008222226 = product of:
      0.024666676 = sum of:
        0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666676 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: ¬The effects of spacing and titles on judgments of the effectiveness of structured abstracts (2007) 0.01
    0.008222226 = product of:
      0.024666676 = sum of:
        0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 1325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666676 = score(doc=1325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1325)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Sauperl, A.; Klasinc, J.; Luzar, S.: Components of abstracts : logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature (2008) 0.01
    0.008222226 = product of:
      0.024666676 = sum of:
        0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666676 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Revising and polishing a structured abstract : is it worth the time and effort? (2008) 0.01
    0.008222226 = product of:
      0.024666676 = sum of:
        0.024666676 = weight(_text_:j in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024666676 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14052401 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044224758 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.01
    0.007989125 = product of:
      0.023967376 = sum of:
        0.023967376 = product of:
          0.047934752 = sum of:
            0.047934752 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047934752 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044224758 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  20. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.01
    0.005991844 = product of:
      0.017975532 = sum of:
        0.017975532 = product of:
          0.035951063 = sum of:
            0.035951063 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035951063 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15486756 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044224758 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22