Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019)
0.02
0.017675493 = product of:
0.035350986 = sum of:
0.035350986 = product of:
0.07070197 = sum of:
0.07070197 = weight(_text_:i in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07070197 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
