Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Yu, N."
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Yu, N.: Readings & Web resources for faceted classification 0.02
    0.018555403 = product of:
      0.037110806 = sum of:
        0.037110806 = product of:
          0.07422161 = sum of:
            0.07422161 = weight(_text_:i in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07422161 = score(doc=4394,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term "facet" has been used in various places, while in most cases it is just a buzz word to replace what is indeed "aspect" or "category". The references below either define and explain the original concept of facet or provide guidelines for building 'real' faceted search/browse. I was interested in faceted classification because it seems to be a natural and efficient way for organizing and browsing Web collections. However, to automatically generate facets and their isolates is extremely difficult since it involves concept extraction and concept grouping, both of which are difficult problems by themselves. And it is almost impossible to achieve mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive 'true' facets without human judgment. Nowadays, faceted search/browse widely exists, implicitly or explicitly, on a majority of retail websites due to the multi-aspects nature of the data. However, it is still rarely seen on any digital library sites. (I could be wrong since I haven't kept myself updated with this field for a while.)