Search (192 results, page 2 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Messer, J.: Neue WWW-Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.02
    0.021425933 = product of:
      0.042851865 = sum of:
        0.042851865 = product of:
          0.08570373 = sum of:
            0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 4455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08570373 = score(doc=4455,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 4455, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4455)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Ergänzung zu: Hayek, I.: WWW-Suchmaschinen: ein Überblick in: Online Mitteilungen Nr.54(1996) S.5-24.
  2. Bar-Ilan, J.: ¬The use of Web search engines in information science research (2003) 0.02
    0.021425933 = product of:
      0.042851865 = sum of:
        0.042851865 = product of:
          0.08570373 = sum of:
            0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 4271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08570373 = score(doc=4271,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 4271, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web was created in 1989, but it has already become a major information channel and source, influencing our everyday lives, commercial transactions, and scientific communication, to mention just a few areas. The seventeenth-century philosopher Descartes proclaimed, "I think, therefore I am" (cogito, ergo sum). Today the Web is such an integral part of our lives that we could rephrase Descartes' statement as "I have a Web presence, therefore I am." Because many people, companies, and organizations take this notion seriously, in addition to more substantial reasons for publishing information an the Web, the number of Web pages is in the billions and growing constantly. However, it is not sufficient to have a Web presence; tools that enable users to locate Web pages are needed as well. The major tools for discovering and locating information an the Web are search engines. This review discusses the use of Web search engines in information science research. Before going into detail, we should define the terms "information science," "Web search engine," and "use" in the context of this review.
  3. Lewandowski, D.: "Find what I mean not what I say" : Neuere Ansätze zur Qualifizierung von Suchmaschinen-Ergebnissen (2001) 0.02
    0.020200564 = product of:
      0.040401127 = sum of:
        0.040401127 = product of:
          0.080802254 = sum of:
            0.080802254 = weight(_text_:i in 5932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080802254 = score(doc=5932,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 5932, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Wills, R.S.: Google's PageRank : the math behind the search engine (2006) 0.02
    0.020200564 = product of:
      0.040401127 = sum of:
        0.040401127 = product of:
          0.080802254 = sum of:
            0.080802254 = weight(_text_:i in 5954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080802254 = score(doc=5954,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 5954, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5954)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Approximately 91 million American adults use the Internet on a typical day The number-one Internet activity is reading and writing e-mail. Search engine use is next in line and continues to increase in popularity. In fact, survey findings indicate that nearly 60 million American adults use search engines on a given day. Even though there are many Internet search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and MSN receive over 81% of all search requests. Despite claims that the quality of search provided by Yahoo! and MSN now equals that of Google, Google continues to thrive as the search engine of choice, receiving over 46% of all search requests, nearly double the volume of Yahoo! and over four times that of MSN. I use Google's search engine on a daily basis and rarely request information from other search engines. One day, I decided to visit the homepages of Google. Yahoo!, and MSN to compare the quality of search results. Coffee was on my mind that day, so I entered the simple query "coffee" in the search box at each homepage. Table 1 shows the top ten (unsponsored) results returned by each search engine. Although ordered differently, two webpages, www.peets.com and www.coffeegeek.com, appear in all three top ten lists. In addition, each pairing of top ten lists has two additional results in common. Depending on the information I hoped to obtain about coffee by using the search engines, I could argue that any one of the three returned better results: however, I was not looking for a particular webpage, so all three listings of search results seemed of equal quality. Thus, I plan to continue using Google. My decision is indicative of the problem Yahoo!, MSN, and other search engine companies face in the quest to obtain a larger percentage of Internet search volume. Search engine users are loyal to one or a few search engines and are generally happy with search results. Thus, as long as Google continues to provide results deemed high in quality, Google likely will remain the top search engine. But what set Google apart from its competitors in the first place? The answer is PageRank. In this article I explain this simple mathematical algorithm that revolutionized Web search.
  5. Bates, M.E.: Quick answers to odd questions (2004) 0.02
    0.019313077 = product of:
      0.038626153 = sum of:
        0.038626153 = product of:
          0.077252306 = sum of:
            0.077252306 = weight(_text_:i in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077252306 = score(doc=3071,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.4507529 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "One of the things I enjoyed the most when I was a reference librarian was the wide range of questions my clients sent my way. What was the original title of the first Godzilla movie? (Gojira, released in 1954) Who said 'I'm as pure as the driven slush'? (Tallulah Bankhead) What percentage of adults have gone to a jazz performance in the last year? (11%) I have found that librarians, speech writers and journalists have one thing in common - we all need to find information on all kinds of topics, and we usually need the answers right now. The following are a few of my favorite sites for finding answers to those there-must-be-an-answer-out-there questions. - For the electronic equivalent to the "ready reference" shelf of resources that most librarians keep hidden behind their desks, check out RefDesk . It is particularly good for answering factual questions - Where do I get the new Windows XP Service Pack? Where is the 386 area code? How do I contact my member of Congress? - Another resource for lots of those quick-fact questions is InfoPlease, the publishers of the Information Please almanac .- Right now, it's full of Olympics data, but it also has links to facts and factoids that you would look up in an almanac, atlas, or encyclopedia. - If you want numbers, start with the Statistical Abstract of the US. This source, produced by the U.S. Census Bureau, gives you everything from the divorce rate by state to airline cost indexes going back to 1980. It is many librarians' secret weapon for pulling numbers together quickly. - My favorite question is "how does that work?" Haven't you ever wondered how they get that Olympic torch to continue to burn while it is being carried by runners from one city to the next? Or how solar sails manage to propel a spacecraft? For answers, check out the appropriately-named How Stuff Works. - For questions about movies, my first resource is the Internet Movie Database. It is easy to search, is such a popular site that mistakes are corrected quickly, and is a fun place to catch trailers of both upcoming movies and those dating back to the 30s. - When I need to figure out who said what, I still tend to rely on the print sources such as Bartlett's Familiar Quotations . No, the current edition is not available on the web, but - and this is the librarian in me - I really appreciate the fact that I not only get the attribution but I also see the source of the quote. There are far too many quotes being attributed to a celebrity, but with no indication of the publication in which the quote appeared. Take, for example, the much-cited quote of Margaret Meade, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed people can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has!" Then see the page on the Institute for Intercultural Studies site, founded by Meade, and read its statement that it has never been able to verify this alleged quote from Meade. While there are lots of web-based sources of quotes (see QuotationsPage.com and Bartleby, for example), unless the site provides the original source for the quotation, I wouldn't rely on the citation. Of course, if you have a hunch as to the source of a quote, and it was published prior to 1923, head over to Project Gutenberg , which includes the full text of over 12,000 books that are in the public domain. When I needed to confirm a quotation of the Red Queen in "Through the Looking Glass", this is where I started. - And if you are stumped as to where to go to find information, instead of Googling it, try the Librarians' Index to the Internet. While it is somewhat US-centric, it is a great directory of web resources."
  6. Auf der Suche nach Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.02
    0.018469224 = product of:
      0.036938448 = sum of:
        0.036938448 = product of:
          0.073876895 = sum of:
            0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073876895 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cogito. 12(1996) H.5, S.19-22
  7. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.02
    0.018469224 = product of:
      0.036938448 = sum of:
        0.036938448 = product of:
          0.073876895 = sum of:
            0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073876895 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  8. Bager, J.: Weniger ist mehr : Internet-Suchmaschinen richtig einsetzen (1998) 0.02
    0.018469224 = product of:
      0.036938448 = sum of:
        0.036938448 = product of:
          0.073876895 = sum of:
            0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073876895 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:22:00
  9. Lob, S.: Per Mausklick auf die neusten Nachrichten : Internet-Suchmaschinen liefern Presse-Überblicke und stellen persönliche Zeitungen zusammen (1998) 0.02
    0.018469224 = product of:
      0.036938448 = sum of:
        0.036938448 = product of:
          0.073876895 = sum of:
            0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073876895 = score(doc=1622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:22:25
  10. Hannemann, M.: Online ins Schlaraffenland der Wissenschaft : Literatur-Recherche im Internet ist ein teures Unterfangen ohne Erfolgsgarantie - Doch wer systematisch sucht, gelangt zügig ans Ziel (1999) 0.02
    0.018469224 = product of:
      0.036938448 = sum of:
        0.036938448 = product of:
          0.073876895 = sum of:
            0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073876895 = score(doc=3106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  11. Watson, I.: Searching the WWW : a quick comparison of Infoseek, Lycos, Yahoo, InfoMarket and Webcrawler (1996) 0.02
    0.017854942 = product of:
      0.035709884 = sum of:
        0.035709884 = product of:
          0.07141977 = sum of:
            0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07141977 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Rogers, I.: ¬The Google Pagerank algorithm and how it works (2002) 0.02
    0.017854942 = product of:
      0.035709884 = sum of:
        0.035709884 = product of:
          0.07141977 = sum of:
            0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07141977 = score(doc=2548,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Page Rank is a topic much discussed by Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) experts. At the heart of PageRank is a mathematical formula that seems scary to look at but is actually fairly simple to understand. Despite this many people seem to get it wrong! In particular "Chris Ridings of www.searchenginesystems.net" has written a paper entitled "PageRank Explained: Everything you've always wanted to know about PageRank", pointed to by many people, that contains a fundamental mistake early on in the explanation! Unfortunately this means some of the recommendations in the paper are not quite accurate. By showing code to correctly calculate real PageRank I hope to achieve several things in this response: - Clearly explain how PageRank is calculated. - Go through every example in Chris' paper, and add some more of my own, showing the correct PageRank for each diagram. By showing the code used to calculate each diagram I've opened myself up to peer review - mostly in an effort to make sure the examples are correct, but also because the code can help explain the PageRank calculations. - Describe some principles and observations on website design based on these correctly calculated examples. Any good web designer should take the time to fully understand how PageRank really works - if you don't then your site's layout could be seriously hurting your Google listings! [Note: I have nothing in particular against Chris. If I find any other papers on the subject I'll try to comment evenly]
  13. Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998) 0.02
    0.017412951 = product of:
      0.034825902 = sum of:
        0.034825902 = product of:
          0.069651805 = sum of:
            0.069651805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069651805 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
  14. Battelle, J.: ¬The search : how Google and its rivals rewrote the rules of business and transformed our culture (2005) 0.02
    0.015969947 = product of:
      0.031939894 = sum of:
        0.031939894 = product of:
          0.06387979 = sum of:
            0.06387979 = weight(_text_:i in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387979 = score(doc=5941,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.37272677 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    If you pick your books by their popularity--how many and which other people are reading them--then know this about The Search: it's probably on Bill Gates' reading list, and that of almost every venture capitalist and startup-hungry entrepreneur in Silicon Valley. In its sweeping survey of the history of Internet search technologies, its gossip about and analysis of Google, and its speculation on the larger cultural implications of a Web-connected world, it will likely receive attention from a variety of businesspeople, technology futurists, journalists, and interested observers of mid-2000s zeitgeist. This ambitious book comes with a strong pedigree. Author John Battelle was a founder of The Industry Standard and then one of the original editors of Wired, two magazines which helped shape our early perceptions of the wild world of the Internet. Battelle clearly drew from his experience and contacts in writing The Search. In addition to the sure-handed historical perspective and easy familiarity with such dot-com stalwarts as AltaVista, Lycos, and Excite, he speckles his narrative with conversational asides from a cast of fascinating characters, such Google's founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin; Yahoo's, Jerry Yang and David Filo; key executives at Microsoft and different VC firms on the famed Sandhill road; and numerous other insiders, particularly at the company which currently sits atop the search world, Google. The Search is not exactly the corporate history of Google. At the book's outset, Battelle specifically indicates his desire to understand what he calls the cultural anthropology of search, and to analyze search engines' current role as the "database of our intentions"--the repository of humanity's curiosity, exploration, and expressed desires. Interesting though that beginning is, though, Battelle's story really picks up speed when he starts dishing inside scoop on the darling business story of the decade, Google. To Battelle's credit, though, he doesn't stop just with historical retrospective: the final part of his book focuses on the potential future directions of Google and its products' development. In what Battelle himself acknowledges might just be a "digital fantasy train", he describes the possibility that Google will become the centralizing platform for our entire lives and quotes one early employee on the weightiness of Google's potential impact: "Sometimes I feel like I am on a bridge, twenty thousand feet up in the air. If I look down I'm afraid I'll fall. I don't feel like I can think about all the implications." Some will shrug at such words; after all, similar hype has accompanied other technologies and other companies before. Many others, though, will search Battelle's story for meaning--and fast.
  15. Wätjen, H.-J.: Mensch oder Maschine? : Auswahl und Erschließung vonm Informationsressourcen im Internet (1996) 0.02
    0.01539102 = product of:
      0.03078204 = sum of:
        0.03078204 = product of:
          0.06156408 = sum of:
            0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06156408 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 2.1996 15:40:22
  16. Loeper, D. von: Sherlock Holmes im Netz (1997) 0.02
    0.01539102 = product of:
      0.03078204 = sum of:
        0.03078204 = product of:
          0.06156408 = sum of:
            0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06156408 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:50:29
  17. Hüskes, R.; Kleber, D.: ¬Den Server im Griff (1999) 0.02
    0.01539102 = product of:
      0.03078204 = sum of:
        0.03078204 = product of:
          0.06156408 = sum of:
            0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06156408 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.1999 21:21:10
  18. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.02
    0.01539102 = product of:
      0.03078204 = sum of:
        0.03078204 = product of:
          0.06156408 = sum of:
            0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06156408 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  19. Eggeling, T.; Kroschel, A.: Alles finden im Web (2000) 0.02
    0.01539102 = product of:
      0.03078204 = sum of:
        0.03078204 = product of:
          0.06156408 = sum of:
            0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06156408 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2000 14:06:22
  20. Sauer, D.: Alles schneller finden (2001) 0.02
    0.01539102 = product of:
      0.03078204 = sum of:
        0.03078204 = product of:
          0.06156408 = sum of:
            0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 6835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06156408 = score(doc=6835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.11.2001 17:25:22

Languages

  • e 97
  • d 93
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 164
  • el 17
  • m 11
  • s 4
  • x 3
  • p 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…