-
Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012)
0.07
0.07154127 = product of:
0.14308254 = sum of:
0.14308254 = sum of:
0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099987686 = score(doc=2546,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043094855 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.07
0.066491924 = product of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.11-22
- Series
- Propozycje i Materialy; 6
-
Bürger, T.: Informationszentrum? Forschungsbibliothek? Dienstleister? : Zum Strukturwandel wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken (2006)
0.07
0.066491924 = product of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=198)
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 3.2006 16:29:22
- Source
- "Geld ist rund und rollt weg, aber Bildung bleibt": 94. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Düsseldorf 2006. Hrsg.: D. Lülfing u. I. Siebert
-
Tilsed, I.: UK library and information science resources on the Internet (1997)
0.07
0.066491924 = product of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.1999 22:09:53
-
as: XML: Extensible Markup Language : I: Was ist XML? (2001)
0.07
0.066491924 = product of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2003 11:06:22
-
Poulakos, I.: ¬"Die Leute suchen immer dasselbe" (2001)
0.07
0.066491924 = product of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 1.1997 12:15:22
-
Khytoretskii, V.M.; Efremenkova, V.M.; Tartakovskii, V.A.: Sootnoshenie klassifikatsionykh skhem bazy dannykh Chemical Abstracts i sootvetstvuyushchikh ei chastei sistemy baz dannykh VINITI (2000)
0.07
0.066491924 = product of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=891)
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 4.2002 13:36:22
-
Garrett, J.: Wandel und Kontinuität im Ethos des Katalogisierens in den USA (2006)
0.07
0.066491924 = product of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 3.2006 16:29:22
- Source
- "Geld ist rund und rollt weg, aber Bildung bleibt": 94. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Düsseldorf 2006. Hrsg.: D. Lülfing u. I. Siebert
-
Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016)
0.07
0.066491924 = product of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.13298385 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000)
0.07
0.06637906 = product of:
0.13275813 = sum of:
0.13275813 = sum of:
0.09581968 = weight(_text_:i in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09581968 = score(doc=917,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.55909014 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036938448 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- I started my professional career in library and information science because of my great interest in knowledge organization. The more experience I gained in the profession, the more I realized how crucial it is to understand which organization would be best for each group of users. This in turn requires an understanding of how users seek information. And so now my focus is an studying information seeking and searching behavior. Throughout the relatively long course of changing my focus, I followed Pauline Cochrane's writings. Now I can say that she has been among the first to have a "user-centered approach" to knowledge organization, and she has used the term three years before it became a mainstream phrase. The following is a short discussion about the usercentered approach which was presented in a workshop in 1997.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.07
0.06502676 = product of:
0.13005352 = sum of:
0.13005352 = sum of:
0.080802254 = weight(_text_:i in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080802254 = score(doc=3053,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049251262 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:40:57
- Language
- i
- Location
- I
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.06
0.059126526 = product of:
0.11825305 = sum of:
0.11825305 = sum of:
0.08747101 = weight(_text_:i in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08747101 = score(doc=5562,freq=12.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.51037717 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03078204 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
-
Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993)
0.06
0.05628545 = sum of:
0.036084887 = product of:
0.14433955 = sum of:
0.14433955 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14433955 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020200564 = product of:
0.040401127 = sum of:
0.040401127 = weight(_text_:i in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040401127 = score(doc=7394,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
-
Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2000)
0.06
0.055580027 = product of:
0.111160055 = sum of:
0.111160055 = sum of:
0.07422161 = weight(_text_:i in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07422161 = score(doc=1183,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036938448 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The following discussion is in appreciation of the invaluable inspirations Pauline Cochrane, by her acumen and perspicacity, has implanted into my thinking regarding various applications of library and information science, especially those involving machine-readable records and subject categorization. It is indeed an honor for me at my age to be offered to contribute to Pauline's Festschrift when instead I should be concerned about my forthcoming obituary. In the following, I must give some Background to what formed my thinking before my involvement in the field and thus before I encountered Pauline.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Salvesen, G.: Is the library able to find the answer? (2005)
0.06
0.055580027 = product of:
0.111160055 = sum of:
0.111160055 = sum of:
0.07422161 = weight(_text_:i in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07422161 = score(doc=3009,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036938448 = score(doc=3009,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- To answer this question I need a theoretical discussion of the aspects that have implication on the quality of the reference service, and an empirical study of the service. By combining theories from the field of reference service, service, goods quality and service quality, I propose six factors related to the total quality of the reference service: The library, the servicescape, the librarian, the user and the answer. From these aspects I have in this paper chosen to focus on the librarian's ability to communicate with the user. The empirical study consists of an analysis of 20 dialogs conversations between user and librarian. The analysis has its theoretical and conceptual roots in Conversation Analysis or CA.
- Date
- 22. 7.2009 10:54:45
-
King, D.W.: Blazing new trails : in celebration of an audacious career (2000)
0.06
0.05531589 = product of:
0.11063178 = sum of:
0.11063178 = sum of:
0.07984974 = weight(_text_:i in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07984974 = score(doc=1184,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.46590847 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03078204 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- I had the distinct pleasure of working with Pauline Atherton (Cochrane) during the 1960s, a period that can be considered the heyday of automated information system design and evaluation in the United States. I first met Pauline at the 1962 American Documentation Institute annual meeting in North Hollywood, Florida. My company, Westat Research Analysts, had recently been awarded a contract by the U.S. Patent Office to provide statistical support for the design of experiments with automated information retrieval systems. I was asked to attend the meeting to learn more about information retrieval systems and to begin informing others of U.S. Patent Office activities in this area. At one session, Pauline and I questioned a speaker about the research that he presented. Pauline's questions concerned the logic of their approach and mine, the statistical aspects. After the session, she came over to talk to me and we began a professional and personal friendship that continues to this day. During the 1960s, Pauline was involved in several important information-retrieval projects including a series of studies for the American Institute of Physics, a dissertation examining the relevance of retrieved documents, and development and evaluation of an online information-retrieval system. I had the opportunity to work with Pauline and her colleagues an four of those projects and will briefly describe her work in the 1960s.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Si, L.: ¬The status quo and future development of cataloging and classification education in China (2005)
0.05
0.05319354 = product of:
0.10638708 = sum of:
0.10638708 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 3544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=3544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3544)
0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049251262 = score(doc=3544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3544)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 19:01:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Education for cataloging: international perspectives. Part I"
-
Tsujii, J.-I.: Automatic acquisition of semantic collocation from corpora (1995)
0.05
0.05319354 = product of:
0.10638708 = sum of:
0.10638708 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049251262 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Moore, A.: As I sit studying : WWW-based reference services (1998)
0.05
0.05319354 = product of:
0.10638708 = sum of:
0.10638708 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049251262 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 7.1998 22:10:42
-
Crocetti, L.: AACR2 in edizione italiana (1997)
0.05
0.05319354 = product of:
0.10638708 = sum of:
0.10638708 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049251262 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 7.1998 10:22:48
- Location
- I
