-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.12
0.121650845 = sum of:
0.07216977 = product of:
0.2886791 = sum of:
0.2886791 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2886791 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.049481075 = product of:
0.09896215 = sum of:
0.09896215 = weight(_text_:i in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09896215 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.57742584 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.05
0.04654435 = product of:
0.0930887 = sum of:
0.0930887 = sum of:
0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049993843 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043094855 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" II : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021)
0.03
0.033245962 = product of:
0.066491924 = sum of:
0.066491924 = sum of:
0.035709884 = weight(_text_:i in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035709884 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03078204 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.
- Content
- Vgl. auch Teil I: Open Password. 2021, Nr.946 vom 12. Juli 2021 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzMxNSwiM2MwMDJhZWIwZDQ0IiwwLDAsMjg1LDFd].
-
Kaser, R.T.: If information wants to be free . . . then who's going to pay for it? (2000)
0.03
0.029609075 = product of:
0.05921815 = sum of:
0.05921815 = product of:
0.1184363 = sum of:
0.1184363 = weight(_text_:i in 1234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1184363 = score(doc=1234,freq=22.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.6910539 = fieldWeight in 1234, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- I have become "brutally honest" of late, at least according to one listener who heard my remarks during a recent whistle stop speaking tour of publishing conventions. This comment caught me a little off guard. Not that I haven't always been frank, but I do try never to be brutal. The truth, I guess, can be painful, even if the intention of the teller is simply objectivity. This paper is based on a "brutally honest" talk I have been giving to publishers, first, in February, to the Association of American Publishers' Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division, at which point I was calling the piece, "The Illusion of Free Information." It was this initial rendition that led to the invitation to publish something here. Since then I've been working on the talk. I gave a second version of it in March to the assembly of the American Society of Information Dissemination Centers, where I called it, "When Sectors Clash: Public Access vs. Private Interest." And, most recently, I gave yet a third version of it to the governing board of the American Institute of Physics. This time I called it: "The Future of Society Publishing." The notion of free information, our government's proper role in distributing free information, and the future of scholarly publishing in a world of free information . . . these are the issues that are floating around in my head. My goal here is to tell you where my thinking is only at this moment, for I reserve the right to continue thinking and developing new permutations on this mentally challenging theme.
-
Kristoffersen, K.A.: Mapping mot Dewey (2016)
0.03
0.02856791 = product of:
0.05713582 = sum of:
0.05713582 = product of:
0.11427164 = sum of:
0.11427164 = weight(_text_:i in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11427164 = score(doc=1950,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Mapping er en aktivitet hvor det etableres relasjoner mellom begreper i to ulike kontrollerte vokabularer. Man mapper fra et kildevokabular og finner korresponderende begreper i et målvokabular. Mapping brukes også til å benevne resultatet av en mappingaktivitet, dvs. relasjonen mellom et begrep i ett vokabular og en eller flere begreper i et annet vokabular.
-
Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000)
0.03
0.02659677 = product of:
0.05319354 = sum of:
0.05319354 = sum of:
0.02856791 = weight(_text_:i in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02856791 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.024625631 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024625631 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Dublin Core is often presented as a modern form of catalog card -- a set of elements (and now qualifiers) that describe resources in a complete package. Sometimes it is proposed as an exchange format for sharing records among multiple collections. The founding principle that "every element is optional and repeatable" reinforces the notion that a Dublin Core description is to be taken as a whole. This paper, in contrast, is based on a much different premise: Dublin Core is a language. More precisely, it is a small language for making a particular class of statements about resources. Like natural languages, it has a vocabulary of word-like terms, the two classes of which -- elements and qualifiers -- function within statements like nouns and adjectives; and it has a syntax for arranging elements and qualifiers into statements according to a simple pattern. Whenever tourists order a meal or ask directions in an unfamiliar language, considerate native speakers will spontaneously limit themselves to basic words and simple sentence patterns along the lines of "I am so-and-so" or "This is such-and-such". Linguists call this pidginization. In such situations, a small phrase book or translated menu can be most helpful. By analogy, today's Web has been called an Internet Commons where users and information providers from a wide range of scientific, commercial, and social domains present their information in a variety of incompatible data models and description languages. In this context, Dublin Core presents itself as a metadata pidgin for digital tourists who must find their way in this linguistically diverse landscape. Its vocabulary is small enough to learn quickly, and its basic pattern is easily grasped. It is well-suited to serve as an auxiliary language for digital libraries. This grammar starts by defining terms. It then follows a 200-year-old tradition of English grammar teaching by focusing on the structure of single statements. It concludes by looking at the growing dictionary of Dublin Core vocabulary terms -- its registry, and at how statements can be used to build the metadata equivalent of paragraphs and compositions -- the application profile.
- Date
- 26.12.2011 14:01:22
-
Barth, T.: Inverse Panopticon : Digitalisierung & Transhumanismus [Transhumanismus II] (2020)
0.03
0.025250703 = product of:
0.050501406 = sum of:
0.050501406 = product of:
0.10100281 = sum of:
0.10100281 = weight(_text_:i in 5592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10100281 = score(doc=5592,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.58933276 = fieldWeight in 5592, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: Barth, T.: Digitalisierung und Lobby: Transhumanismus I. [12. Januar 2020]. Unter: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Digitalisierung-und-Lobby-Transhumanismus-I-4633314.html?view=print.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.02176619 = product of:
0.04353238 = sum of:
0.04353238 = product of:
0.08706476 = sum of:
0.08706476 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08706476 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.02
0.02176619 = product of:
0.04353238 = sum of:
0.04353238 = product of:
0.08706476 = sum of:
0.08706476 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08706476 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999)
0.02
0.021547427 = product of:
0.043094855 = sum of:
0.043094855 = product of:
0.08618971 = sum of:
0.08618971 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08618971 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Ariadne. 1999, no.22
-
Chessum, K.; Haiming, L.; Frommholz, I.: ¬A study of search user interface design based on Hofstede's six cultural dimensions (2022)
0.02
0.021425933 = product of:
0.042851865 = sum of:
0.042851865 = product of:
0.08570373 = sum of:
0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08570373 = score(doc=856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Negrini, G.: Principi filosofici per classificare : una teoria per la scienza (2003)
0.02
0.020200564 = product of:
0.040401127 = sum of:
0.040401127 = product of:
0.080802254 = sum of:
0.080802254 = weight(_text_:i in 4137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080802254 = score(doc=4137,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 4137, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4137)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The article illustrates briefly the principles at the basis of the theory of science and the universal system conceived. Ingetraut Dahlberg occupa un posto di primo piano in Documentazione per le iniziative importanti che ha realizzato e per l'apporto teoretico fornito all'ordinamento conoscenze. Critica sulle possibilità di sviluppo degli attuali sistemi di classificazione universale, fondati per paradigmi storico-filosofici su discipline, Dahlberg introduce una teoria concettuale rivolta all'organizzazione del singolo campo di conoscenza e del sapere universale. L'articolo espone brevemente i principî che sono alla base della teoria e del sistema universale concepito.
- Language
- i
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.02
0.018469224 = product of:
0.036938448 = sum of:
0.036938448 = product of:
0.073876895 = sum of:
0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073876895 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020)
0.02
0.018469224 = product of:
0.036938448 = sum of:
0.036938448 = product of:
0.073876895 = sum of:
0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073876895 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 14:08:22
-
Weibel, S.L.: Border crossings : reflections on a decade of metadata consensus building (2005)
0.02
0.017854942 = product of:
0.035709884 = sum of:
0.035709884 = product of:
0.07141977 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=1187,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In June of this year, I performed my final official duties as part of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative management team. It is a happy irony to affix a seal on that service in this journal, as both D-Lib Magazine and the Dublin Core celebrate their tenth anniversaries. This essay is a personal reflection on some of the achievements and lessons of that decade. The OCLC-NCSA Metadata Workshop took place in March of 1995, and as we tried to understand what it meant and who would care, D-Lib magazine came into being and offered a natural venue for sharing our work. I recall a certain skepticism when Bill Arms said "We want D-Lib to be the first place people look for the latest developments in digital library research." These were the early days in the evolution of electronic publishing, and the goal was ambitious. By any measure, a decade of high-quality electronic publishing is an auspicious accomplishment, and D-Lib (and its host, CNRI) deserve congratulations for having achieved their goal. I am grateful to have been a contributor. That first DC workshop led to further workshops, a community, a variety of standards in several countries, an ISO standard, a conference series, and an international consortium. Looking back on this evolution is both satisfying and wistful. While I am pleased that the achievements are substantial, the unmet challenges also provide a rich till in which to cultivate insights on the development of digital infrastructure.
-
Rogers, I.: ¬The Google Pagerank algorithm and how it works (2002)
0.02
0.017854942 = product of:
0.035709884 = sum of:
0.035709884 = product of:
0.07141977 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=2548,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Page Rank is a topic much discussed by Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) experts. At the heart of PageRank is a mathematical formula that seems scary to look at but is actually fairly simple to understand. Despite this many people seem to get it wrong! In particular "Chris Ridings of www.searchenginesystems.net" has written a paper entitled "PageRank Explained: Everything you've always wanted to know about PageRank", pointed to by many people, that contains a fundamental mistake early on in the explanation! Unfortunately this means some of the recommendations in the paper are not quite accurate. By showing code to correctly calculate real PageRank I hope to achieve several things in this response: - Clearly explain how PageRank is calculated. - Go through every example in Chris' paper, and add some more of my own, showing the correct PageRank for each diagram. By showing the code used to calculate each diagram I've opened myself up to peer review - mostly in an effort to make sure the examples are correct, but also because the code can help explain the PageRank calculations. - Describe some principles and observations on website design based on these correctly calculated examples. Any good web designer should take the time to fully understand how PageRank really works - if you don't then your site's layout could be seriously hurting your Google listings! [Note: I have nothing in particular against Chris. If I find any other papers on the subject I'll try to comment evenly]
-
Dachwitz, I.: Klare Grenzen für Digitalwirtschaft : Sachverständige fordern Algorithmengesetz & Co. (2016)
0.02
0.017854942 = product of:
0.035709884 = sum of:
0.035709884 = product of:
0.07141977 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Albinus, L.: Can science cope with more than one world? : a cross-reading of Habermas, Popper, and Searle (2013)
0.02
0.017854942 = product of:
0.035709884 = sum of:
0.035709884 = product of:
0.07141977 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 4520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=4520,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 4520, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4520)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this article is to critically assess the 'three-world theory' as it is presented-with some slight but decisive differences-by Ju¨rgen Habermas and Karl Popper. This theory presents the philosophy of science with a conceptual and material problem, insofar as it claims that science has no single access to all aspects of the world. Although I will try to demonstrate advantages of Popper's idea of 'the third world' of ideas, the shortcomings of his ontological stance become visible from the pragmatic point of view in Habermas's theory of communicative acts. With regard to the critique that the three-world theory has met in both its pragmatic and ontological versions, I will take a closer look at John Searle's naturalistic counter-position. By teasing out some problematic implications in his theory of causation, I aim to show that Searle's approach is, in fact, much closer to Popper's than he might think. Finally, while condoning Habermas's distinction between the natural world and the lifeworld, I will opt for a pragmatically differentiated view of 'the real', rather than speaking of different worlds.
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019)
0.02
0.017675493 = product of:
0.035350986 = sum of:
0.035350986 = product of:
0.07070197 = sum of:
0.07070197 = weight(_text_:i in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07070197 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
-
Barth, T.: Digitalisierung und Lobby : Transhumanismus I (2020)
0.02
0.017675493 = product of:
0.035350986 = sum of:
0.035350986 = product of:
0.07070197 = sum of:
0.07070197 = weight(_text_:i in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07070197 = score(doc=5665,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41253293 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Digitalisierung-und-Lobby-Transhumanismus-I-4633314.html?view=print
