Search (57 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"x"
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.15
    0.15110652 = sum of:
      0.108254656 = product of:
        0.43301862 = sum of:
          0.43301862 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.43301862 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.042851865 = product of:
        0.08570373 = sum of:
          0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08570373 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
    Footnote
    Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde Vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
  2. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.07
    0.070356816 = sum of:
      0.04510611 = product of:
        0.18042444 = sum of:
          0.18042444 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18042444 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.025250703 = product of:
        0.050501406 = sum of:
          0.050501406 = weight(_text_:i in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050501406 = score(doc=855,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  3. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.06
    0.06296105 = sum of:
      0.04510611 = product of:
        0.18042444 = sum of:
          0.18042444 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18042444 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017854942 = product of:
        0.035709884 = sum of:
          0.035709884 = weight(_text_:i in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035709884 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  4. Kowalewski, I.: Barockliteratur online im Internet : Das Verzeichnis der im deutschen Sprachraum erschienenen Drucke des 17. Jahrhunderts (VD 17) (1999) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2000 10:31:39
  5. Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2015 9:22:39
  6. Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011) 0.04
    0.03962113 = product of:
      0.07924226 = sum of:
        0.07924226 = sum of:
          0.035709884 = weight(_text_:i in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035709884 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.04353238 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04353238 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
    Content
    Dissertation am Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft der Philosophische Fakultät I an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Vgl.: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/bertram-jutta-2011-06-30/PDF/bertram.pdf.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 20:40:31
  7. Düring, M.: ¬Die Dewey Decimal Classification : Entstehung, Aufbau und Ausblick auf eine Nutzung in deutschen Bibliotheken (2003) 0.03
    0.033245962 = product of:
      0.066491924 = sum of:
        0.066491924 = sum of:
          0.035709884 = weight(_text_:i in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035709884 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
          0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03078204 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die ständig steigende Zahl an publizierter Information in immer neuen Formen verlangt besonders von Informations- und Dokumentationseinrichtungen immer präzisere Lösungen zur Erschließung dieser Informationen und ihrer benutzerfreundlichen Aufbereitung. Besonders im derzeitigen Zeitalter der Datenbanken und Online-Kataloge ist die Kombination von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Sacherschließung gefordert, ohne dabei die Verbindung zu den älteren, vielerorts noch (zumindest zusätzlich) in Verwendung befindlichen, Zettelkatalogen zu verlieren. Weltweit ist eine Vielzahl an verschiedenen Klassifikationen im Einsatz. Die Wahl der für eine Einrichtung passenden Klassifikation ist abhängig von ihrer thematischen und informationellen Ausrichtung, der Größe und Art der Bestände und nicht zuletzt von technischen und personellen Voraussetzungen. Auf Seiten der zu wählenden Klassifikation sind die Einfachheit der Handhabung für den Bibliothekar, die Verständlichkeit für den Benutzer, die Erweiterungsfähigkeit der Klassifikation durch das Aufkommen neuer Wissensgebiete und die Einbindung in informationelle Netze mit anderen Einrichtungen von entscheidender Bedeutung. In dieser Arbeit soll die Dewey Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) hinsichtlich dieser Punkte näher beleuchtet werden. Sie ist die weltweit am häufigsten benutzte Klassifikation. Etwa 200.000 Bibliotheken in 135 Ländern erschließen ihre Bestände mit diesem System. Sie liegt derzeit bereits in der 22. ungekürzten Auflage vor und wurde bisher in 30 Sprachen übersetzt. Eine deutsche Komplettübersetzung wird im Jahre 2005 erscheinen. Trotz teils heftig geführter Standardisierungsdebatten und Plänen für die Übernahme von amerikanischen Formalerschließungsregeln herrscht in Bezug auf die Sacherschließung unter deutschen Bibliotheken wenig Einigkeit. Die DDC ist in Deutschland und anderen europäischen Ländern kaum verbreitet, sieht von Großbritannien und von der Verwendung in Bibliografien ab. Diese Arbeit geht demzufolge auf die historischen Gründe dieser Entwicklung ein und wagt einen kurzen Ausblick in die Zukunft der Dezimalklassifikation.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin / Philosophische Fakultät I / Institut für Bibliothekswissenschaft
  8. Wirtjes, I.: Kommunale Information in Btx : Darstellung und Vergleich mit anderen Informationsquellen (1992) 0.03
    0.02856791 = product of:
      0.05713582 = sum of:
        0.05713582 = product of:
          0.11427164 = sum of:
            0.11427164 = weight(_text_:i in 6848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11427164 = score(doc=6848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.6667539 = fieldWeight in 6848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6848)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Capelle, I.: Vergleich zwischen Wissenschaftsklassifikationen einzelner Philosophen (Bacon, d'Alembert, Hegel, Rickert und Wundt) und der Allgemeinen Systematik für Büchereien (ASB) (1961) 0.02
    0.024996921 = product of:
      0.049993843 = sum of:
        0.049993843 = product of:
          0.099987686 = sum of:
            0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 1293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099987686 = score(doc=1293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 1293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Mischke, I.: Allgemeine Jahrbücher und ihr Nutzwert für den Informationsdienst : Auswahl und kritischer Vergleich von mindestens zehn laufend erscheinenden Werken aus dem deutschen und englischen Sprachbereich (1979) 0.02
    0.024996921 = product of:
      0.049993843 = sum of:
        0.049993843 = product of:
          0.099987686 = sum of:
            0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 6839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099987686 = score(doc=6839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 6839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Feierabend, J.: Navigation in Datenbanken unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Orientierungsmöglichkeiten in Btx (1994) 0.02
    0.024996921 = product of:
      0.049993843 = sum of:
        0.049993843 = product of:
          0.099987686 = sum of:
            0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 7475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099987686 = score(doc=7475,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 7475, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7475)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    I,42,XIII Bl
  12. Jepkens, I.: CD-PACs: CD-ROM als Alternative zur Gestaltung von Online-Publikumskatalogen; eine vergleichende Diskussion gestützt auf das Beispield der UB Bielefeld (1991) 0.02
    0.024996921 = product of:
      0.049993843 = sum of:
        0.049993843 = product of:
          0.099987686 = sum of:
            0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 8910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099987686 = score(doc=8910,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 8910, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8910)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Hannover, I.: ¬Die "Allgemeine Systematik für Öffentliche Büchereien" und die "Systematik der Buchaufstellung in der Stadtbücherei in Bielefeld" : ein Vergleich (1967) 0.02
    0.024996921 = product of:
      0.049993843 = sum of:
        0.049993843 = product of:
          0.099987686 = sum of:
            0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099987686 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Stünkel, M.: Neuere Methoden der inhaltlichen Erschließung schöner Literatur in öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.02
    0.024625631 = product of:
      0.049251262 = sum of:
        0.049251262 = product of:
          0.098502524 = sum of:
            0.098502524 = weight(_text_:22 in 5815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098502524 = score(doc=5815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 8.2006 21:35:22
  15. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.02
    0.022553055 = product of:
      0.04510611 = sum of:
        0.04510611 = product of:
          0.18042444 = sum of:
            0.18042444 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18042444 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  16. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.02
    0.022553055 = product of:
      0.04510611 = sum of:
        0.04510611 = product of:
          0.18042444 = sum of:
            0.18042444 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18042444 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  17. Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013) 0.02
    0.02164797 = product of:
      0.04329594 = sum of:
        0.04329594 = product of:
          0.08659188 = sum of:
            0.08659188 = weight(_text_:i in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08659188 = score(doc=1077,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.5052476 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
  18. Menges, T.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Übertragbarkeit eines Buches auf Hypertext am Beispiel einer französischen Grundgrammatik (Klein; Kleineidam) (1997) 0.02
    0.021547427 = product of:
      0.043094855 = sum of:
        0.043094855 = product of:
          0.08618971 = sum of:
            0.08618971 = weight(_text_:22 in 1496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08618971 = score(doc=1496,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1496, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1496)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1998 18:23:25
  19. Schneider, A.: ¬Die Verzeichnung und sachliche Erschließung der Belletristik in Kaysers Bücherlexikon und im Schlagwortkatalog Georg/Ost (1980) 0.02
    0.021547427 = product of:
      0.043094855 = sum of:
        0.043094855 = product of:
          0.08618971 = sum of:
            0.08618971 = weight(_text_:22 in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08618971 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:07:22
  20. Sperling, R.: Anlage von Literaturreferenzen für Onlineressourcen auf einer virtuellen Lernplattform (2004) 0.02
    0.021547427 = product of:
      0.043094855 = sum of:
        0.043094855 = product of:
          0.08618971 = sum of:
            0.08618971 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08618971 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.11.2005 18:39:22

Languages

  • d 45
  • e 11
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…