Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07
    0.07259655 = sum of:
      0.054127328 = product of:
        0.21650931 = sum of:
          0.21650931 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21650931 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018469224 = product of:
        0.036938448 = sum of:
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 3.2007 19:55:22
    Source
    Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
  3. Computational linguistics for the new millennium : divergence or synergy? Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, 21-22 July 2000. Festschrift in honour of Peter Hellwig on the occasion of his 60th birthday (2002) 0.04
    0.040641725 = product of:
      0.08128345 = sum of:
        0.08128345 = sum of:
          0.050501406 = weight(_text_:i in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050501406 = score(doc=4900,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
          0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03078204 = score(doc=4900,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Contents: Manfred Klenner / Henriette Visser: Introduction - Khurshid Ahmad: Writing Linguistics: When I use a word it means what I choose it to mean - Jürgen Handke: 2000 and Beyond: The Potential of New Technologies in Linguistics - Jurij Apresjan / Igor Boguslavsky / Leonid Iomdin / Leonid Tsinman: Lexical Functions in NU: Possible Uses - Hubert Lehmann: Practical Machine Translation and Linguistic Theory - Karin Haenelt: A Contextbased Approach towards Content Processing of Electronic Documents - Petr Sgall / Eva Hajicová: Are Linguistic Frameworks Comparable? - Wolfgang Menzel: Theory and Applications in Computational Linguistics - Is there Common Ground? - Robert Porzel / Michael Strube: Towards Context-adaptive Natural Language Processing Systems - Nicoletta Calzolari: Language Resources in a Multilingual Setting: The European Perspective - Piek Vossen: Computational Linguistics for Theory and Practice.
  4. Feldman, S.: Find what I mean, not what I say : meaning-based search tools (2000) 0.03
    0.025250703 = product of:
      0.050501406 = sum of:
        0.050501406 = product of:
          0.10100281 = sum of:
            0.10100281 = weight(_text_:i in 4799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10100281 = score(doc=4799,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.58933276 = fieldWeight in 4799, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Godby, C.J.: ¬Two Techniques for the Identification of Phrases in Full Text (2001) 0.02
    0.021425933 = product of:
      0.042851865 = sum of:
        0.042851865 = product of:
          0.08570373 = sum of:
            0.08570373 = weight(_text_:i in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08570373 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: OCLC and the Internet: An Historical Overview of Research Activities, 1990-1999 - Part I
  6. Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009) 0.02
    0.018469224 = product of:
      0.036938448 = sum of:
        0.036938448 = product of:
          0.073876895 = sum of:
            0.073876895 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073876895 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 3.2013 14:56:22
  7. He, Q.: ¬A study of the strength indexes in co-word analysis (2000) 0.02
    0.015150423 = product of:
      0.030300846 = sum of:
        0.030300846 = product of:
          0.060601693 = sum of:
            0.060601693 = weight(_text_:i in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060601693 = score(doc=111,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Co-word analysis is a technique for detecting the knowledge structure of scientific literature and mapping the dynamics in a research field. It is used to count the co-occurrences of term pairs, compute the strength between term pairs, and map the research field by inserting terms and their linkages into a graphical structure according to the strength values. In previous co-word studies, there are two indexes used to measure the strength between term pairs in order to identify the major areas in a research field - the inclusion index (I) and the equivalence index (E). This study will conduct two co-word analysis experiments using the two indexes, respectively, and compare the results from the two experiments. The results show, due to the difference in their computation, index I is more likely to identify general subject areas in a research field while index E is more likely to identify subject areas at more specific levels
  8. Diaz, I.; Morato, J.; Lioréns, J.: ¬An algorithm for term conflation based on tree structures (2002) 0.01
    0.014283955 = product of:
      0.02856791 = sum of:
        0.02856791 = product of:
          0.05713582 = sum of:
            0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05713582 = score(doc=246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Blair, D.C.: Information retrieval and the philosophy of language (2002) 0.01
    0.014283955 = product of:
      0.02856791 = sum of:
        0.02856791 = product of:
          0.05713582 = sum of:
            0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05713582 = score(doc=4283,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval - the retrieval, primarily, of documents or textual material - is fundamentally a linguistic process. At the very least we must describe what we want and match that description with descriptions of the information that is available to us. Furthermore, when we describe what we want, we must mean something by that description. This is a deceptively simple act, but such linguistic events have been the grist for philosophical analysis since Aristotle. Although there are complexities involved in referring to authors, document types, or other categories of information retrieval context, here I wish to focus an one of the most problematic activities in information retrieval: the description of the intellectual content of information items. And even though I take information retrieval to involve the description and retrieval of written text, what I say here is applicable to any information item whose intellectual content can be described for retrieval-books, documents, images, audio clips, video clips, scientific specimens, engineering schematics, and so forth. For convenience, though, I will refer only to the description and retrieval of documents. The description of intellectual content can go wrong in many obvious ways. We may describe what we want incorrectly; we may describe it correctly but in such general terms that its description is useless for retrieval; or we may describe what we want correctly, but misinterpret the descriptions of available information, and thereby match our description of what we want incorrectly. From a linguistic point of view, we can be misunderstood in the process of retrieval in many ways. Because the philosophy of language deals specifically with how we are understood and mis-understood, it should have some use for understanding the process of description in information retrieval. First, however, let us examine more closely the kinds of misunderstandings that can occur in information retrieval. We use language in searching for information in two principal ways. We use it to describe what we want and to discriminate what we want from other information that is available to us but that we do not want. Description and discrimination together articulate the goals of the information search process; they also delineate the two principal ways in which language can fail us in this process. Van Rijsbergen (1979) was the first to make this distinction, calling them "representation" and "discrimination.""
  10. Koppel, M.; Akiva, N.; Dagan, I.: Feature instability as a criterion for selecting potential style markers (2006) 0.01
    0.014283955 = product of:
      0.02856791 = sum of:
        0.02856791 = product of:
          0.05713582 = sum of:
            0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 6092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05713582 = score(doc=6092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 6092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Toutanova, K.; Klein, D.; Manning, C.D.; Singer, Y.: Feature-rich Part-of-Speech Tagging with a cyclic dependency network (2003) 0.01
    0.012498461 = product of:
      0.024996921 = sum of:
        0.024996921 = product of:
          0.049993843 = sum of:
            0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 1059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049993843 = score(doc=1059,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1059, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1059)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present a new part-of-speech tagger that demonstrates the following ideas: (i) explicit use of both preceding and following tag contexts via a dependency network representation, (ii) broad use of lexical features, including jointly conditioning on multiple consecutive words, (iii) effective use of priors in conditional loglinear models, and (iv) fine-grained modeling of unknown word features. Using these ideas together, the resulting tagger gives a 97.24%accuracy on the Penn TreebankWSJ, an error reduction of 4.4% on the best previous single automatically learned tagging result.
  12. Toutanova, K.; Manning, C.D.: Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy Part-of-Speech Tagger (2000) 0.01
    0.012498461 = product of:
      0.024996921 = sum of:
        0.024996921 = product of:
          0.049993843 = sum of:
            0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049993843 = score(doc=1060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents results for a maximumentropy-based part of speech tagger, which achieves superior performance principally by enriching the information sources used for tagging. In particular, we get improved results by incorporating these features: (i) more extensive treatment of capitalization for unknown words; (ii) features for the disambiguation of the tense forms of verbs; (iii) features for disambiguating particles from prepositions and adverbs. The best resulting accuracy for the tagger on the Penn Treebank is 96.86% overall, and 86.91% on previously unseen words.
  13. Doszkocs, T.E.; Zamora, A.: Dictionary services and spelling aids for Web searching (2004) 0.01
    0.010883095 = product of:
      0.02176619 = sum of:
        0.02176619 = product of:
          0.04353238 = sum of:
            0.04353238 = weight(_text_:22 in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04353238 = score(doc=2541,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2004 17:22:56
    Source
    Online. 28(2004) no.3, S.22-29
  14. Hammwöhner, R.: TransRouter revisited : Decision support in the routing of translation projects (2000) 0.01
    0.010773714 = product of:
      0.021547427 = sum of:
        0.021547427 = product of:
          0.043094855 = sum of:
            0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043094855 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.12.2000 18:22:35
  15. Paolillo, J.C.: Linguistics and the information sciences (2009) 0.01
    0.010773714 = product of:
      0.021547427 = sum of:
        0.021547427 = product of:
          0.043094855 = sum of:
            0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043094855 = score(doc=3840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:33
  16. Nait-Baha, L.; Jackiewicz, A.; Djioua, B.; Laublet, P.: Query reformulation for information retrieval on the Web using the point of view methodology : preliminary results (2001) 0.01
    0.010712966 = product of:
      0.021425933 = sum of:
        0.021425933 = product of:
          0.042851865 = sum of:
            0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042851865 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The work we are presenting is devoted to the information collected on the WWW. By the term collected we mean the whole process of retrieving, extracting and presenting results to the user. This research is part of the RAP (Research, Analyze, Propose) project in which we propose to combine two methods: (i) query reformulation using linguistic markers according to a given point of view; and (ii) text semantic analysis by means of contextual exploration results (Descles, 1991). The general project architecture describing the interactions between the users, the RAP system and the WWW search engines is presented in Nait-Baha et al. (1998). We will focus this paper on showing how we use linguistic markers to reformulate the queries according to a given point of view
  17. Ferret, O.; Grau, B.; Hurault-Plantet, M.; Illouz, G.; Jacquemin, C.; Monceaux, L.; Robba, I.; Vilnat, A.: How NLP can improve question answering (2002) 0.01
    0.010712966 = product of:
      0.021425933 = sum of:
        0.021425933 = product of:
          0.042851865 = sum of:
            0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042851865 = score(doc=1850,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Atlam, E.-S.; Morita, K.; Fuketa, M.; Aoe, J.-i.: ¬A new method for selecting English field association terms of compound words and its knowledge representation (2002) 0.01
    0.010712966 = product of:
      0.021425933 = sum of:
        0.021425933 = product of:
          0.042851865 = sum of:
            0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042851865 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Bian, G.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Cross-language information access to multilingual collections on the Internet (2000) 0.01
    0.009234612 = product of:
      0.018469224 = sum of:
        0.018469224 = product of:
          0.036938448 = sum of:
            0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036938448 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 2.2000 14:22:39
  20. Wright, S.E.: Leveraging terminology resources across application boundaries : accessing resources in future integrated environments (2000) 0.01
    0.008927471 = product of:
      0.017854942 = sum of:
        0.017854942 = product of:
          0.035709884 = sum of:
            0.035709884 = weight(_text_:i in 5528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035709884 = score(doc=5528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 5528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5528)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The title for this conference, stated in English, is Language Technology for a Dynamic Economy - y in the Media Age - The question arises as to what the media are we are dealing with and to what extent we are moving away from tile reality of different media to a world in which all sub-categories flow together into a unified stream of information that is constantly resealed to appear in different hardware configurations. A few years ago, people who were interested in sharing data or getting different electronic "boxes" to talk to each other were focused on two major aspects: I ) developing data conversion technology, and 2) convincing potential users that sharing information was an even remotely interesting option. Although some content "owners" are still reticent about releasing their data, it has become dramatically apparent in the Web environment that a broad range of users does indeed want this technology. Even as researchers struggle with the remaining technical, legal, and ethical impediments that stand in the way of unlimited information access to existing multi-platform resources, the future view of the world will no longer be as obsessed with conversion capability as it will be with creating content, with ,in eye to morphing technologies that will enable the delivery of that content from ail open-standards-based format such as XML (eXtensibic Markup Language), MPEG (Moving Picture Experts Group), or WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) to a rich variety of display Options