-
Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006)
0.04
0.039895155 = product of:
0.07979031 = sum of:
0.07979031 = sum of:
0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042851865 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036938448 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.04
0.039895155 = product of:
0.07979031 = sum of:
0.07979031 = sum of:
0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042851865 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036938448 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Mainz, I.; Weller, K.; Paulsen, I.; Mainz, D.; Kohl, J.; Haeseler, A. von: Ontoverse : collaborative ontology engineering for the life sciences (2008)
0.02
0.020200564 = product of:
0.040401127 = sum of:
0.040401127 = product of:
0.080802254 = sum of:
0.080802254 = weight(_text_:i in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080802254 = score(doc=1594,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Weller, K.; Peters, I.: Reconsidering relationships for knowledge representation (2007)
0.02
0.020200564 = product of:
0.040401127 = sum of:
0.040401127 = product of:
0.080802254 = sum of:
0.080802254 = weight(_text_:i in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080802254 = score(doc=216,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.4714662 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Proceedings of I-Know '07, Graz, September 5-7
-
Park, O.n.: Opening ontology design : a study of the implications of knowledge organization for ontology design (2008)
0.02
0.018555403 = product of:
0.037110806 = sum of:
0.037110806 = product of:
0.07422161 = sum of:
0.07422161 = weight(_text_:i in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07422161 = score(doc=2489,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is proposed that sufficient research into ontology design has not been achieved and that this deficiency has led to the insufficiency of ontology in reinforcing its communications frameworks, knowledge sharing and re-use applications. In order to diagnose the problems of ontology research, I first survey the notion of ontology in the context of ontology design, based on a Means-Ends tool provided by a Cognitive Work Analysis. The potential contributions of knowledge organization in library and information sciences that can be used to improve the limitations of ontology research are demonstrated. I propose a context-centered view as an approach for ontology design, and present faceted classification as an appropriate method for structuring ontology. In addition, I also provides a case study of wine ontology in order to demonstrate how knowledge organization approaches in library and information science can improve ontology design.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.02
0.018042443 = product of:
0.036084887 = sum of:
0.036084887 = product of:
0.14433955 = sum of:
0.14433955 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14433955 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Sánchez, M.F.: Semantically enhanced Information Retrieval : an ontology-based approach (2006)
0.02
0.017854942 = product of:
0.035709884 = sum of:
0.035709884 = product of:
0.07141977 = sum of:
0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07141977 = score(doc=4327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Part I. Analyzing the state of the art - What is semantic search? Part II. The proposal - An ontology-based IR model - Semantic retrieval on the Web Part III. Extensions - Semantic knowledge gateway - Coping with knowledge incompleteness
-
Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004)
0.02
0.016533911 = product of:
0.033067822 = sum of:
0.033067822 = product of:
0.066135645 = sum of:
0.066135645 = weight(_text_:i in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066135645 = score(doc=2362,freq=14.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38588926 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."
According to my findings several relations available in the thesaurus query interface as "roles", are not used, i.e. there are not yet any assertions with them. And those which are used do not contribute to complete concept definitions of concepts which represent thesaurus main entries. In other words: The authors claim to already have a "description logic based nomenclature", where there is not yet one which deserves that title by being much more than a thesaurus with strict subsumption and additional inheritable semantic links. In the last section of the paper the authors say: "The most time consuming process in this conversion was making a careful analysis of the Thesaurus to understand the best way to translate it into OWL." "For other conversions, these same types of distinctions and decisions must be made. The expressive power of a proprietary encoding can vary widely from that in OWL or RDF. Understanding the original semantics and engineering a solution that most closely duplicates it is critical for creating a useful and accu-rate ontology." My question is: What decisions were made and are they exemplary, can they be rec-ommended as "the best way"? I raise strong doubts with respect to that, and I miss more profound discussions of the issues at stake. The following notes are dedicated to a critical description and assessment of the results of that conversion activity. They are written in a tutorial style more or less addressing students, but myself being a learner especially in the field of medical knowledge representation I do not speak "ex cathedra".
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.01539102 = product of:
0.03078204 = sum of:
0.03078204 = product of:
0.06156408 = sum of:
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002)
0.02
0.01539102 = product of:
0.03078204 = sum of:
0.03078204 = product of:
0.06156408 = sum of:
0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06156408 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 5.2010 16:22:35
-
Baumer, C.; Reichenberger, K.: Business Semantics - Praxis und Perspektiven (2006)
0.01
0.014283955 = product of:
0.02856791 = sum of:
0.02856791 = product of:
0.05713582 = sum of:
0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713582 = score(doc=6020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Object
- I-Views
-
Peters, I.; Weller. K.: Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in knowledge organization systems (2008)
0.01
0.012498461 = product of:
0.024996921 = sum of:
0.024996921 = product of:
0.049993843 = sum of:
0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049993843 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004)
0.01
0.012498461 = product of:
0.024996921 = sum of:
0.024996921 = product of:
0.049993843 = sum of:
0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049993843 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Paralic, J.; Kostial, I.: Ontology-based information retrieval (2003)
0.01
0.012498461 = product of:
0.024996921 = sum of:
0.024996921 = product of:
0.049993843 = sum of:
0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049993843 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.0123128155 = product of:
0.024625631 = sum of:
0.024625631 = product of:
0.049251262 = sum of:
0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049251262 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.0123128155 = product of:
0.024625631 = sum of:
0.024625631 = product of:
0.049251262 = sum of:
0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049251262 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.010773714 = product of:
0.021547427 = sum of:
0.021547427 = product of:
0.043094855 = sum of:
0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043094855 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.01
0.010773714 = product of:
0.021547427 = sum of:
0.021547427 = product of:
0.043094855 = sum of:
0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043094855 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.01
0.010773714 = product of:
0.021547427 = sum of:
0.021547427 = product of:
0.043094855 = sum of:
0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043094855 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
-
Dirsch-Weigand, A.; Schmidt, I.: ConWeaver : Automatisierte Wissensnetze für die semantische Suche (2006)
0.01
0.010712966 = product of:
0.021425933 = sum of:
0.021425933 = product of:
0.042851865 = sum of:
0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 6026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042851865 = score(doc=6026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.045439374 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 6026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6026)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
