Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Willett, P.: Recent trends in hierarchic document clustering : a critical review (1988) 0.03
    0.02599572 = product of:
      0.05199144 = sum of:
        0.05199144 = product of:
          0.10398288 = sum of:
            0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 2604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10398288 = score(doc=2604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 2604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Zunde, P.: Selected bibliography on information theory applications to information science and related subject areas (1984) 0.03
    0.02599572 = product of:
      0.05199144 = sum of:
        0.05199144 = product of:
          0.10398288 = sum of:
            0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10398288 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966) 0.03
    0.02599572 = product of:
      0.05199144 = sum of:
        0.05199144 = product of:
          0.10398288 = sum of:
            0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10398288 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Bergeron, P.; Hiller, C.A.: Competitive intelligence (2002) 0.03
    0.02599572 = product of:
      0.05199144 = sum of:
        0.05199144 = product of:
          0.10398288 = sum of:
            0.10398288 = weight(_text_:p in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10398288 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.024658704 = product of:
      0.04931741 = sum of:
        0.04931741 = product of:
          0.09863482 = sum of:
            0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09863482 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
  6. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.02
    0.024658704 = product of:
      0.04931741 = sum of:
        0.04931741 = product of:
          0.09863482 = sum of:
            0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09863482 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
  7. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.02
    0.024658704 = product of:
      0.04931741 = sum of:
        0.04931741 = product of:
          0.09863482 = sum of:
            0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09863482 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024658704 = product of:
      0.04931741 = sum of:
        0.04931741 = product of:
          0.09863482 = sum of:
            0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09863482 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  9. Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996) 0.02
    0.024658704 = product of:
      0.04931741 = sum of:
        0.04931741 = product of:
          0.09863482 = sum of:
            0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09863482 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.10.1996 14:22:33
  10. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.02
    0.024658704 = product of:
      0.04931741 = sum of:
        0.04931741 = product of:
          0.09863482 = sum of:
            0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09863482 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  11. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.02
    0.024658704 = product of:
      0.04931741 = sum of:
        0.04931741 = product of:
          0.09863482 = sum of:
            0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09863482 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  12. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02
    0.024658704 = product of:
      0.04931741 = sum of:
        0.04931741 = product of:
          0.09863482 = sum of:
            0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09863482 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  13. Hernon, P.; McClure, C.R.: Electronic U.S. government information : policy issues and directions (1993) 0.02
    0.022746254 = product of:
      0.045492508 = sum of:
        0.045492508 = product of:
          0.090985015 = sum of:
            0.090985015 = weight(_text_:p in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.090985015 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.02
    0.021576365 = product of:
      0.04315273 = sum of:
        0.04315273 = product of:
          0.08630546 = sum of:
            0.08630546 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08630546 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  15. Campe, P.: Case, semantic roles, and grammatical relations : a comprehensive bibliography (1994) 0.02
    0.01949679 = product of:
      0.03899358 = sum of:
        0.03899358 = product of:
          0.07798716 = sum of:
            0.07798716 = weight(_text_:p in 8663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07798716 = score(doc=8663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 8663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Erlandsson, A.: Electronic records management : a literature review (1997) 0.02
    0.016247325 = product of:
      0.03249465 = sum of:
        0.03249465 = product of:
          0.0649893 = sum of:
            0.0649893 = weight(_text_:p in 1716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0649893 = score(doc=1716,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 1716, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1716)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Auch als: http://www.archives.ca/ica/p-er/english.html
  17. Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994) 0.02
    0.01541169 = product of:
      0.03082338 = sum of:
        0.03082338 = product of:
          0.06164676 = sum of:
            0.06164676 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06164676 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
  18. Kling, R.: ¬The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing (2003) 0.01
    0.013786313 = product of:
      0.027572626 = sum of:
        0.027572626 = product of:
          0.055145252 = sum of:
            0.055145252 = weight(_text_:p in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055145252 = score(doc=4272,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the early 1990s, much of the enthusiasm for the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication focused an electronic journals, especially electronic-only, (pure) e journals (see for example, Peek & Newby's [1996] anthology). Much of the systematic research an the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication also focused an electronic journals. However, by the late 1990s, numerous scientific publishers had transformed their paper journals (p journals) into paper and electronic journals (p-e journals) and sold them via subscription models that did not provide the significant costs savings, speed of access, or breadth of audience that pure e -journal advocates had expected (Okerson, 1996). In 2001, a group of senior life scientists led a campaign to have publishers make their journals freely available online six months after publication (Russo, 2001). The campaign leaders, using the name "Public Library of Science," asked scientists to boycott journals that did not comply with these demands for open access. Although the proposal was discussed in scientific magazines and conferences, it apparently did not persuade any journal publishers to comply (Young, 2002). Most productive scientists, who work for major universities and research institutes
  19. Davenport, E.; Hall, H.: Organizational Knowledge and Communities of Practice (2002) 0.01
    0.013786313 = product of:
      0.027572626 = sum of:
        0.027572626 = product of:
          0.055145252 = sum of:
            0.055145252 = weight(_text_:p in 4293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055145252 = score(doc=4293,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 4293, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A community of practice has recently been defined as "a flexible group of professionals, informally bound by common interests, who interact through interdependent tasks guided by a common purpose thereby embodying a store of common knowledge" (Jubert, 1999, p. 166). The association of communities of practice with the production of collective knowledge has long been recognized, and they have been objects of study for a number of decades in the context of professional communication, particularly communication in science (Abbott, 1988; Bazerman & Paradis, 1991). Recently, however, they have been invoked in the domain of organization studies as sites where people learn and share insights. If, as Stinchcombe suggests, an organization is "a set of stable social relations, dehberately created, with the explicit intention of continuously accomplishing some specific goals or purposes" (Stinchcombe, 1965, p. 142), where does this "flexible" and "embodied" source of knowledge fit? Can communities of practice be harnessed, engineered, and managed like other organizational groups, or does their strength lie in the fact that they operate outside the stable and persistent social relations that characterize the organization?
  20. Benoit, G.: Data mining (2002) 0.01
    0.013786313 = product of:
      0.027572626 = sum of:
        0.027572626 = product of:
          0.055145252 = sum of:
            0.055145252 = weight(_text_:p in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055145252 = score(doc=4296,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Data mining (DM) is a multistaged process of extracting previously unanticipated knowledge from large databases, and applying the results to decision making. Data mining tools detect patterns from the data and infer associations and rules from them. The extracted information may then be applied to prediction or classification models by identifying relations within the data records or between databases. Those patterns and rules can then guide decision making and forecast the effects of those decisions. However, this definition may be applied equally to "knowledge discovery in databases" (KDD). Indeed, in the recent literature of DM and KDD, a source of confusion has emerged, making it difficult to determine the exact parameters of both. KDD is sometimes viewed as the broader discipline, of which data mining is merely a component-specifically pattern extraction, evaluation, and cleansing methods (Raghavan, Deogun, & Sever, 1998, p. 397). Thurasingham (1999, p. 2) remarked that "knowledge discovery," "pattern discovery," "data dredging," "information extraction," and "knowledge mining" are all employed as synonyms for DM. Trybula, in his ARIST chapter an text mining, observed that the "existing work [in KDD] is confusing because the terminology is inconsistent and poorly defined.

Languages

  • e 47
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 45
  • b 11
  • m 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…