-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.06
0.059450306 = product of:
0.11890061 = sum of:
0.11890061 = product of:
0.17835091 = sum of:
0.0805355 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0805355 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.09781541 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09781541 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.03
0.02599295 = product of:
0.0519859 = sum of:
0.0519859 = product of:
0.07797885 = sum of:
0.053524997 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053524997 = score(doc=5171,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14936681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.358346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.024453852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024453852 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.022293864 = product of:
0.044587728 = sum of:
0.044587728 = product of:
0.06688159 = sum of:
0.030200815 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200815 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.036680777 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036680777 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.02
0.022293864 = product of:
0.044587728 = sum of:
0.044587728 = product of:
0.06688159 = sum of:
0.030200815 = weight(_text_:j in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200815 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.036680777 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036680777 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Hjerppe, R.: ¬An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis (1980)
0.02
0.020601781 = product of:
0.041203562 = sum of:
0.041203562 = product of:
0.12361068 = sum of:
0.12361068 = weight(_text_:r in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12361068 = score(doc=1115,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14936681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.8275646 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- r
-
Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005)
0.02
0.017493902 = product of:
0.034987804 = sum of:
0.034987804 = product of:
0.052481703 = sum of:
0.025167344 = weight(_text_:j in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025167344 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.02731436 = weight(_text_:r in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02731436 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14936681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
-
Klitzing, N.; Hoekstra, R.; Strijbos, J.-W,: Literature practices : processes leading up to a citation (2019)
0.02
0.017493902 = product of:
0.034987804 = sum of:
0.034987804 = product of:
0.052481703 = sum of:
0.025167344 = weight(_text_:j in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025167344 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
0.02731436 = weight(_text_:r in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02731436 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14936681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004)
0.02
0.01677503 = product of:
0.03355006 = sum of:
0.03355006 = product of:
0.05032509 = sum of:
0.0284736 = weight(_text_:j in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0284736 = score(doc=2920,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.19859353 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
0.021851487 = weight(_text_:r in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021851487 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14936681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Szientometrie beschäftigt sich mit der Messbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Leistungen anhand bibliothekarisch nachweisbarer Publikationsergebnisse. Bei genauer Betrachtung ist es ihr Ziel, die Wissenszunahme der Wissenschaft zu messen. Die wissenschaftliche Produktion in Form von Publikationen wächst seit über dreihundert Jahren konstant mit ca. 3,5% pro Jahr. Das entspricht einerVerdopplungsrate von 20 Jahren, die zuerst dem Bibliothekar Fremont Rider 1948 bei Büchern auffiel und die 1963 von Derek J. de Solla Price auch für das Wachstum von Zeitschriften und Bibliografien bestätigt wurde. Die Konstanz dieser Evolution, unabhängig aller sich ereignenden Katastrophen, ist nur zum Teil verstanden, macht aber den unaufhaltsamen Fortschritt der Wissenschaft deutlich. Alle 20 Jahre wird so viel publiziert wie in allen Jahrhunderten davor. Eine etwa gleiche Zunahme verzeichnen die Wissenschaftler, die damit etwa gleich produktiv bleiben. Von ihnen allen sind damit ca. 87% unsere heutigen Zeitgenossen. Aus diesem Wachstum heraus können wir abschätzen, dass in 100.000 laufenden Zeitschriften heute etwa 10 Mio. Publikationen jährlich erscheinen, die von 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern verfasst werden. Dabei definieren sich nur die als Wissenschaftler, die durchschnittlich eine Publikation jährlich verfassen. Die gesamte Produktion an Buchtiteln, die bisher erschien, dürfte bei etwa 100 Mio. liegen. Davon sind etwa 20 Mio. als wissenschaftlich einzustufen. Wenn folglich 87% aller Wissenschaftler noch heute leben, so betrug die Gesamtzahl der Wissenschaftler in der Welt bisher 11,5 Mio., die in ihrem Leben durchschnittlich 1,5 Bücher pro Kopf verfassten, und etwa das 10-20fache an Zeitschriftenbeiträgen leisteten. Ein Teil dieser Bücher sind allerdings Neuauflagen und Übersetzungen. Nach Lotka, A. J. ist die Produktivität der Wissenschaftler eine schiefe Verteilung von der Form A/n**2, wobei A die Zahl der Autoren mit nur einer Publikation ist und n die Publikationen pro Autor. Während Price in seinen "Networks of Scientific Papers" Vergleichswerte von n**2,5 bis n**3 angab, zeigten Untersuchungen am Science Citation Index (SCI), die auf die gesamte naturwissenschaftliche Literatur hochgerechnet wurden, eher einen Wert von n**1,7. Auf die Tatsache, dass eine Verdopplungsrate der Wissenschaftler von 20 Jahren und eine solche der Menschheit von etwa 50 Jahren dazu führt, dass eines Tages alle Menschen Wissenschaftler werden, hat Price bereits 1963 hingewiesen. Dieser Zustand müsste bei 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern und 6 Mrd. Menschen in etwa 300 Jahren eintreten, ein nur scheinbar absurder Gedanke, wenn man bedenkt, dass man sich vor 300 Jahren auch kaum vorstellen konnte, dass alle Menschen Lesen, Schreiben und Rechnen lernen können, und dass wir uns ungebildete Menschen immer weniger leisten können.
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.02
0.016302569 = product of:
0.032605138 = sum of:
0.032605138 = product of:
0.09781541 = sum of:
0.09781541 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09781541 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.014409571 = product of:
0.028819142 = sum of:
0.028819142 = product of:
0.086457424 = sum of:
0.086457424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086457424 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Gorraiz, J.: ¬Die unerträgliche Bedeutung der Zitate (1992)
0.01
0.013422584 = product of:
0.026845168 = sum of:
0.026845168 = product of:
0.0805355 = sum of:
0.0805355 = weight(_text_:j in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0805355 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Page, L.; Brin, S.; Motwani, R.; Winograd, T.: ¬The PageRank citation ranking : Bringing order to the Web (1999)
0.01
0.012746702 = product of:
0.025493404 = sum of:
0.025493404 = product of:
0.07648021 = sum of:
0.07648021 = weight(_text_:r in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07648021 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14936681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.01
0.011624299 = product of:
0.023248598 = sum of:
0.023248598 = product of:
0.069745794 = sum of:
0.069745794 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069745794 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
-
Rajan, T.N.; Guha, B.; Sayanarayana, R.: Associate relationship of concepts as seen through citations and citation index (1982)
0.01
0.010925744 = product of:
0.021851487 = sum of:
0.021851487 = product of:
0.06555446 = sum of:
0.06555446 = weight(_text_:r in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06555446 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14936681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.010189106 = product of:
0.020378212 = sum of:
0.020378212 = product of:
0.061134633 = sum of:
0.061134633 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061134633 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.008645743 = product of:
0.017291486 = sum of:
0.017291486 = product of:
0.051874455 = sum of:
0.051874455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051874455 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998)
0.01
0.008389115 = product of:
0.01677823 = sum of:
0.01677823 = product of:
0.05033469 = sum of:
0.05033469 = weight(_text_:j in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05033469 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.13, S.1259-1261 (J. Andersen)
-
Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999)
0.01
0.008389115 = product of:
0.01677823 = sum of:
0.01677823 = product of:
0.05033469 = sum of:
0.05033469 = weight(_text_:j in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05033469 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14337628 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.008151284 = product of:
0.016302569 = sum of:
0.016302569 = product of:
0.048907705 = sum of:
0.048907705 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048907705 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15801097 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006)
0.01
0.007283829 = product of:
0.014567658 = sum of:
0.014567658 = product of:
0.043702975 = sum of:
0.043702975 = weight(_text_:r in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043702975 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14936681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.045122404 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
