Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0072086784 = product of:
  0.014417357 = sum of:
    0.014417357 = product of:
      0.07208678 = sum of:
        0.07208678 = weight(_text_:schneider in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07208678 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2778981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.640641 = idf(docFreq=156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041848082 = queryNorm
            0.25940004 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.640641 = idf(docFreq=156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

What is a mashup? / Darlene Fichter -- Behind the scenes : some technical details on mashups / Bonaria Biancu -- Making your data available to be mashed up / Ross Singer -- Mashing up with librarian knowledge / Thomas Brevik -- Information in context / Brian Herzog -- Mashing up the library website / Lichen Rancourt -- Piping out library data / Nicole C. Engard -- Mashups @ Libraries interact / Corey Wallis -- Library catalog mashup : using Blacklight to expose collections / Bess Sadler, Joseph Gilbert, and Matt Mitchell -- Breaking into the OPAC / Tim Spalding -- Mashing up open data with biblios.net Web services / Joshua Ferraro -- SOPAC 2.0 : the thrashable, mashable catalog / John Blyberg -- Mashups with the WorldCat Affiliate Services / Karen A. Coombs -- Flickr and digital image collections / Mark Dahl and Jeremy McWilliams -- Blip.tv and digital video collections in the library / Jason A. Clark -- Where's the nearest computer lab? : mapping up campus / Derik A. Badman -- The repository mashup map / Stuart Lewis -- The LibraryThing API and libraries / Robin Hastings -- ZACK bookmaps / Wolfram Schneider -- Federated database search mashup / Stephen Hedges, Laura Solomon, and Karl Jendretzky -- Electronic dissertation mashups using SRU / Michael C. Witt.

Footnote

Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 62(2009) H.4, S.83-85 (S. Breitling): "Jede/r Web-Nutzer/in ist einem Mashup schon einmal begegnet. Mashups sind Webapplikationen bzw. -seiten, die Daten und Funktionalität aus zwei oder mehr frei zugänglichen Quellen zu einem neuen Service auf einer eigenen Webseite kombinieren. Dieser Dienst bietet einen Mehrwert für die Nutzerinnen durch Zusammenführung und Verknüpfung von Informationen an einem zentralen Ort. Z.B. werden sehr häufig Karten in Standortangaben eingebunden, oder im Bibliothekskatalog werden Amazon-Buchcover oder ein Link auf Google Book Search angezeigt. Darüber hinaus gibt es jedoch eine Vielzahl von Möglichkeiten, kreativ Mashups für den Bibliotheksbereich zu entwickeln, wie das vorliegende Werk "Library Mashups - exploring new ways to deliver library data" eindrucksvoll beweist. Nicole C. Engard, die als Open-Source-Botschafterin in der Bibliothekswelt für den Einsatz dieser Software-Palette als integrierte Bibliothekssysteme (Koha, Evergreen) wirbt, konnte als Herausgeberin so bekannte Personen gewinnen wie Tim Spalding, Gründer von LibraryThing, oder aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich Wolfram Schneider, Entwickler des Z39.50-Dienstes ZACK.

0.0040778443 = product of:
  0.008155689 = sum of:
    0.008155689 = product of:
      0.040778443 = sum of:
        0.040778443 = weight(_text_:schneider in 1796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040778443 = score(doc=1796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2778981 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.640641 = idf(docFreq=156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041848082 = queryNorm
            0.14673883 = fieldWeight in 1796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.640641 = idf(docFreq=156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1796)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 55(2004) no.11, S.1025-1026 (D.E. Agosto): ""Did you ever feel as though the Internet has caused you to lose control of your library?" So begins the introduction to this volume of over 50 articles, essays, library policies, and other documents from a variety of sources, most of which are library journals aimed at practitioners. Volume editor Block has a long history of library service as well as an active career as an online journalist. From 1977 to 1999 she was the Associate Director of Public Services at the St. Ambrose University library in Davenport, Iowa. She was also a Fox News Online weekly columnist from 1998 to 2000. She currently writes for and publishes the weekly ezine Exlibris, which focuses an the use of computers, the Internet, and digital databases to improve library services. Despite the promising premise of this book, the final product is largely a disappointment because of the superficial coverage of its issues. A listing of the most frequently represented sources serves to express the general level and style of the entries: nine articles are reprinted from Computers in Libraries, five from Library Journal, four from Library Journal NetConnect, four from ExLibris, four from American Libraries, three from College & Research Libraries News, two from Online, and two from The Chronicle of Higher Education. Most of the authors included contributed only one item, although Roy Tennant (manager of the California Digital Library) authored three of the pieces, and Janet L. Balas (library information systems specialist at the Monroeville Public Library in Pennsylvania) and Karen G. Schneider (coordinator of lii.org, the Librarians' Index to the Internet) each wrote two. Volume editor Block herself wrote six of the entries, most of which have been reprinted from ExLibris. Reading the volume is muck like reading an issue of one of these journals-a pleasant experience that discusses issues in the field without presenting much research. Net Effects doesn't offer much in the way of theory or research, but then again it doesn't claim to. Instead, it claims to be an "idea book" (p. 5) with practical solutions to Internet-generated library problems. While the idea is a good one, little of the material is revolutionary or surprising (or even very creative), and most of the solutions offered will already be familiar to most of the book's intended audience.