Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft"
  1. Kleinwächter, W.: Macht und Geld im Cyberspace : wie der Weltgipfel zur Informationsgesellschaft (WSIS) die Weichen für die Zukunft stellt (2004) 0.01
    0.011022343 = product of:
      0.022044687 = sum of:
        0.022044687 = product of:
          0.044089373 = sum of:
            0.044089373 = weight(_text_:22 in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044089373 = score(doc=145,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.12.2006 18:22:32
    Isbn
    3-936931-22-4
  2. Bolz, N.: Am Ende der Gutenberggalaxis : die neuen Kommunikationsverhältnisse (1995) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 1564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=1564,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 1564, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    AMD (E)
    GHBS
    AMD (E)
  3. Negroponte, N.: Total digital : die Welt zwischen 0 und 1 oder die Zukunft der Kommunikation (1996) 0.00
    0.0014856312 = product of:
      0.0029712624 = sum of:
        0.0029712624 = product of:
          0.005942525 = sum of:
            0.005942525 = weight(_text_:e in 1668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005942525 = score(doc=1668,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 1668, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    OKH (E)
    GHBS
    OKH (E)
  4. Mossberger, K.; Tolbert, C.J.; Stansbury, M.: Virtual inequality : beyond the digital divide (2003) 0.00
    0.0014856312 = product of:
      0.0029712624 = sum of:
        0.0029712624 = product of:
          0.005942525 = sum of:
            0.005942525 = weight(_text_:e in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005942525 = score(doc=1795,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 55(2004) no.5, S.467-468 (W. Koehler): "Virtual Inequality is an important contribution to the digital divide debate. That debate takes two basic forms. One centers an the divide between the "information rich" developed countries and the "information poor" developing countries. The second is concerned with the rift between information "haves" and "have-nots" within countries. This book addresses the latter domain and is concerned with the digital divide in the United States. This book is the product of a cross-disciplinary collaboration. Mossberger and Tolbert are both members of the Kent State University political science department while Stansbury is an the Library and Information Science faculty. The book is extremely well documented. Perhaps the chapter an the democracy divide and e-government is the best done, reflecting the political science bent of two of the authors. E-government is very well covered. Unfortunately, e-commerce and e-education go virtually unmentioned. If e-government is important to defining the digital divide, then certainly e-commerce and e-education are as well. Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury argue that the digital divide should be described as four different divides: the access divide, the skills divide, the economic opportunity divide, and the democratic divide. Each of these divides is developed in its own chapter. Each chapter draws well an the existing literature. The book is valuable if for no other reason than that it provides an excellent critique of the current state of the understanding of the digital divide in the United States. It is particularly good in its contrast of the approaches taken by the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. Perhaps this is a function of the multidisciplinary strength of the book's authorship, for indeed it shows here. The access divide is defined along "connectivity" lines: who has access to digital technologies. The authors tonfirm the conventional wisdom that age and education are important predictors of in-home access, but they also argue that rate and ethnicity are also factors (pp. 32-33): Asian Americans have greatest access followed by whites, Latinos, and African Americans in that order. Most access the Internet from home or work, followed by friends' computers, libraries, and other access points. The skills divide is defined as technical competence and information literacy (p. 38). Variation was found along technical competence for age, education, affluence, rate, and ethnicity, but not gender (p. 47). The authors conclude that for the most part the skills divide mirrors the access divide (p. 55). While they found no gender difference, they did find a gender preference for skills acquisition: males prefer a more impersonal delivery ("online help and tutorials") while females prefer more personal instruction (p. 56).
    Language
    e
  5. Weinberger, D.: ¬Das Ende der Schublade : die Macht der neuen digitalen Unordnung (2008) 0.00
    0.0014856312 = product of:
      0.0029712624 = sum of:
        0.0029712624 = product of:
          0.005942525 = sum of:
            0.005942525 = weight(_text_:e in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005942525 = score(doc=2866,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    OGC (E)
    GHBS
    OGC (E)
  6. Gleick, J.: ¬The information : a history, a theory, a flood (2011) 0.00
    0.0013131249 = product of:
      0.0026262498 = sum of:
        0.0026262498 = product of:
          0.0052524996 = sum of:
            0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 4979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0052524996 = score(doc=4979,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4979, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4979)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  7. Blair, D.: Wittgenstein, language and information : "Back to the Rough Ground!" (2006) 0.00
    0.0010504998 = product of:
      0.0021009997 = sum of:
        0.0021009997 = product of:
          0.0042019994 = sum of:
            0.0042019994 = weight(_text_:e in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042019994 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  8. Mossberger, K.; Tolbert, C.J.; McNeal, R.S.: Digital citizenship : the internet, society, and participation (2007) 0.00
    0.0010504998 = product of:
      0.0021009997 = sum of:
        0.0021009997 = product of:
          0.0042019994 = sum of:
            0.0042019994 = weight(_text_:e in 1972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042019994 = score(doc=1972,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 1972, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1972)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  9. Gleick, J.: ¬Die Information : Geschichte, Theorie, Flut (2011) 0.00
    0.0010504998 = product of:
      0.0021009997 = sum of:
        0.0021009997 = product of:
          0.0042019994 = sum of:
            0.0042019994 = weight(_text_:e in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042019994 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  10. Keen, A.: ¬The cult of the amateur : how today's internet is killing our culture (2007) 0.00
    9.2851947E-4 = product of:
      0.0018570389 = sum of:
        0.0018570389 = product of:
          0.0037140779 = sum of:
            0.0037140779 = weight(_text_:e in 797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0037140779 = score(doc=797,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.056147262 = fieldWeight in 797, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=797)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Wenn Wikipedia und blogs nur Ergänzungen zur Kultur und zur Information wären, wäre dies nicht gravierend. Das Problem ist, dass sie Ihren Ersatz geworden sind. Darüber hinaus neben der Unerfahrenheit der Autoren steht auch die Anonymität, die ermöglicht, dass sich zwischen den Amateurs Dessinformanten, getarnten Publizisten (vor allem die Spezialisten in Enten und Desinformation, welche jetzt die ganze Welt direkt und glaubhafter erreichen können) zwischen schieben. Fügen wir diesem apokalyptischen Panorama die intellektuelle Piraterie hinzu, werden wir eine Welt haben, in der die Schöpfer von den Nachahmern verdrängt werden. Dies annulliert die Motivation für die Schöpfung des Neuen. Der Autor gibt uns einige Beispiele, wie die Entlassungen bei Disney Productions. Eine große nordamerikanische Fernsehkette hat teuere Serien in Prime Time aus dem Programm entfernt, weil diese nicht mehr rentabel sind. Andere Beispiele u.a. sind die Verluste der traditionellen Presse und das Verschwinden von spezialisierten Platten- und Bücherläden egal wie gut sie waren. Andere Themen: Invasion der Privatsphäre durch das Internet, E-Mail Betrug, wachsende Kinderpornografie, das Plagiat bei Schülern sind auch in dem Buch enthalten. So sollten wir uns ein furchtbares Bild der von den neuen Technologien verursachten Probleme machen. Aber der Kern des Buches besteht in die Verteidigung des individuellen Schöpfertums und des Fachwissens. Beide sind nach Meinung des Autors die Hauptopfer des Web 2.0. Das Buch ist ein Pamphlet, was im Prinzip nicht Schlechtes bedeutet. Marx, Nietzsche, u..v.a. haben auch Pamphlete geschrieben und einige dieser Schriften haben bei der Gestaltung der modernen Welt beigetragen. Das Buch hat alle Merkmale des Pamphlets: ist kurz, kontrovers, aggressiv und einseitig. Daran liegen seine Kräfte und seine Schwäche. Der Text kann in einigen wenigen Stunden gelesen werden und schärft die Wahrnehmung des Leser vor scheinbar unschädlichen Praktiken: runterladen eines Liedes oder die Zusammenstellung einer Schulaufgabe. Weil er einseitig ist, der Autor absichtlich ignoriert, dass viele dieser Probleme unabhängig des Internets existieren, wie das Plagiat. Er unterdrückt auch Tatsachen, wie die Kontrollmechanismen von Wikipedia, die sie genau so vertrauensvoll wie die Encyclopaedia Britannica machen. Aber gerade weil das Buch einseitig ist, hilft der Autor dem Dialog zwischen den unterschiedlichen Formen, um das Internet zu sehen und zu nutzen. (Aus der Originalrezension in Spanisch von Juan Carlos Castillon, Barcelona, en el Blog Penultimos Dias)
    Language
    e
  11. Levy, S.: In the plex : how Google thinks, works, and shapes our lives (2011) 0.00
    9.191874E-4 = product of:
      0.0018383748 = sum of:
        0.0018383748 = product of:
          0.0036767495 = sum of:
            0.0036767495 = weight(_text_:e in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0036767495 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.05558295 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e

Languages

Subjects

Classifications