Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beghtol, C."
  1. Beghtol, C.: Nancy J. Williamson and the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) (2010) 0.01
    0.0069703124 = product of:
      0.02788125 = sum of:
        0.02788125 = product of:
          0.0557625 = sum of:
            0.0557625 = weight(_text_:j in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0557625 = score(doc=3566,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11345512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article documents and analyzes Nancy J. Williamson's contributions to two of the major publications of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), International Classification/ Knowledge Organization and Advances in Classification Research. The results show her serious and long-standing commitment to the field of representing and organizing information and knowledge and her dedication to expanding worldwide interest and involvement in these fields. The Appendix provides access to each of Williamson's contributions to the two ISKO publications.
    Biographed
    Williamson, Nancy J.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem special issue: Is there a catalog in your future? Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor
  2. Beghtol, C.: 'Facets' as interdisciplinary undiscovered public knowledge : S.R. Ranganathan in India and L. Guttman in Israel (1995) 0.01
    0.0066102617 = product of:
      0.026441047 = sum of:
        0.026441047 = product of:
          0.052882094 = sum of:
            0.052882094 = weight(_text_:l in 2217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052882094 = score(doc=2217,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14191823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 2217, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Undiscovered public knowledge is a relatively unstudied phenomenon, and the few extended examples that have been published are intradisciplinary. This paper presents the concept of 'facet' as an example of interdisciplinary undiscovered public knowledge. 'Facets' were central to the bibliographic classification theory of S.R. Ranganathan in India and to the behavioural research of L. Guttman in Israel. The term had the same meaning in both fields, and the concept was developed and exploited at about the same time in both, but two separate, unconnected literatures grew up around the term and its associated concepts. This paper examines the origins and parallel uses of the concept and the term in both fields as a case study of interdisciplinary knowledge that could have been, but was apparantly not, doscovered any time between the aerly 1950s and the present using simple, readily available information retrieval techniques
  3. Beghtol, C.: ¬L'¬efficacia del recupero (1993) 0.01
    0.006232214 = product of:
      0.024928857 = sum of:
        0.024928857 = product of:
          0.049857713 = sum of:
            0.049857713 = weight(_text_:l in 4018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049857713 = score(doc=4018,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14191823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4018, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4018)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994) 0.01
    0.0054531875 = product of:
      0.02181275 = sum of:
        0.02181275 = product of:
          0.0436255 = sum of:
            0.0436255 = weight(_text_:l in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0436255 = score(doc=3413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14191823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.3, S.165-167 (W. Bies); JASIS 46(1995) no.5, S.389-390 (E.G. Bierbaum); Canadian journal of information and library science 20(1995) nos.3/4, S.52-53 (L. Rees-Potter)
  5. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0048376457 = product of:
      0.019350583 = sum of:
        0.019350583 = product of:
          0.038701165 = sum of:
            0.038701165 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038701165 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1250357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  6. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.00
    0.0030235287 = product of:
      0.012094115 = sum of:
        0.012094115 = product of:
          0.02418823 = sum of:
            0.02418823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02418823 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1250357 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
  7. Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery : relationships between "professional" and "naïve" classifications (2003) 0.00
    0.0024893973 = product of:
      0.009957589 = sum of:
        0.009957589 = product of:
          0.019915178 = sum of:
            0.019915178 = weight(_text_:j in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019915178 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11345512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. Stellungnahme dazu in: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61.
  8. Beghtol, C.: From the universe of knowledge to the universe of concepts : the structural revolution in classification for information retrieval (2008) 0.00
    0.0024893973 = product of:
      0.009957589 = sum of:
        0.009957589 = product of:
          0.019915178 = sum of:
            0.019915178 = weight(_text_:j in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019915178 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11345512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    During the twentieth century, bibliographic classification theory underwent a structural revolution. The first modern bibliographic classifications were top-down systems that started at the universe of knowledge and subdivided that universe downward to minute subclasses. After the invention of faceted classification by S.R. Ranganathan, the ideal was to build bottom-up classifications that started with the universe of concepts and built upward to larger and larger faceted classes. This ideal has not been achieved, and the two kinds of classification systems are not mutually exclusive. This paper examines the process by which this structural revolution was accomplished by looking at the spread of facet theory after 1924 when Ranganathan attended the School of Librarianship, London, through selected classification textbooks that were published after that date. To this end, the paper examines the role of W.C.B. Sayers as a teacher and author of three editions of The Manual of Classification for Librarians and Bibliographers. Sayers influenced both Ranganathan and the various members of the Classification Research Group (CRG) who were his students. Further, the paper contrasts the methods of evaluating classification systems that arose between Sayers's Canons of Classification in 1915- 1916 and J. Mills's A Modern Outline of Library Classification in 1960 in order to demonstrate the speed with which one kind of classificatory structure was overtaken by another.
  9. Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen (2004) 0.00
    0.0017425781 = product of:
      0.0069703124 = sum of:
        0.0069703124 = product of:
          0.013940625 = sum of:
            0.013940625 = weight(_text_:j in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013940625 = score(doc=3536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11345512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03570582 = queryNorm
                0.12287348 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61. - Vgl. die Erwiderung von Nicolaisen und Hjoerland in KO 31(2004) no.3, S.199-201.