Search (72 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.05 
    0.05001079 = product of:
  0.10002158 = sum of:
    0.10002158 = sum of:
      0.031305563 = weight(_text_:m in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031305563 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0067213746 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.061994642 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061994642 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
    Type
    m
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.05 
    0.04581068 = product of:
  0.09162136 = sum of:
    0.09162136 = product of:
      0.13743204 = sum of:
        0.013442749 = weight(_text_:a in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013442749 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
        0.123989284 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123989284 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
    Type
    a
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.05 
    0.04581068 = product of:
  0.09162136 = sum of:
    0.09162136 = product of:
      0.13743204 = sum of:
        0.013442749 = weight(_text_:a in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013442749 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
        0.123989284 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123989284 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
    Type
    a
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.05 
    0.04581068 = product of:
  0.09162136 = sum of:
    0.09162136 = product of:
      0.13743204 = sum of:
        0.013442749 = weight(_text_:a in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013442749 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
        0.123989284 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123989284 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
    Type
    a
  5. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.03 
    0.032067478 = product of:
  0.064134955 = sum of:
    0.064134955 = product of:
      0.096202426 = sum of:
        0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009409925 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
        0.0867925 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0867925 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.9-22
    Type
    a
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Wissensorganisation - eine neue Wissenschaft? (1994) 0.02 
    0.020281035 = product of:
  0.04056207 = sum of:
    0.04056207 = product of:
      0.060843103 = sum of:
        0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 8940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0500889 = score(doc=8940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 8940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8940)
        0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 8940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0107542 = score(doc=8940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 8940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8940)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Grundfragen und Aufgaben. Hrsg.: R. Wille u. M. Zickwolff
    Type
    a
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.02 
    0.01832427 = product of:
  0.03664854 = sum of:
    0.03664854 = product of:
      0.054972813 = sum of:
        0.0053771 = weight(_text_:a in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053771 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
        0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049595714 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  8. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.02 
    0.016852736 = product of:
  0.033705473 = sum of:
    0.033705473 = product of:
      0.050558206 = sum of:
        0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067213746 = score(doc=1493,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
        0.043836832 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043836832 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A lot of information that is already available on the Web, or retrieved from local information systems and social networks is structured in data silos that are not semantically related. Semantic technologies make it emerge that the use of typed links that directly express their relations are an advantage for every application that can reuse the incorporated knowledge about the data. For this reason, data integration, through reengineering (e.g. triplify), or querying (e.g. D2R) is an important task in order to make information available for everyone. Thus, in order to build a semantic map of the data, we need knowledge about data items itself and the relation between heterogeneous data items. In this paper, we present our work of providing Lexical Linked Data (LLD) through a meta-model that contains all the resources and gives the possibility to retrieve and navigate them from different perspectives. We combine the existing work done on knowledge domains (based on the Information Coding Classification) within the Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (based on the RDF/OWL EurowordNet and the related integrated lexical resources (MultiWordNet, EuroWordNet, MEMODATA Lexicon, Hamburg Methaphor DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Universalität - viele Anwenderterminologien unter einem Dach : fachlich-terminologische Instrumentarien nach Maß? (1995) 0.02 
    0.015210776 = product of:
  0.030421551 = sum of:
    0.030421551 = product of:
      0.045632325 = sum of:
        0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037566677 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00806565 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Imprint
    Frankfurt /M. : Indeks
    Type
    a
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Wissensorganisation : Entwicklung, Aufgabe, Anwendung, Zukunft (2014) 0.01 
    0.014220315 = product of:
  0.02844063 = sum of:
    0.02844063 = product of:
      0.042660944 = sum of:
        0.03795598 = weight(_text_:m in 2198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03795598 = score(doc=2198,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.3333438 = fieldWeight in 2198, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2198)
        0.0047049625 = weight(_text_:a in 2198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047049625 = score(doc=2198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2198)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Anlaß für dieses kleine Werk war einerseits meine Feststellung bei der letzten internationalen Konferenz der Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation in Krakau, 19.-23.5.2014, dass sehr viele junge Teilnehmer sich offen-bar nicht klar waren, was eigentlich unter "Wissensorganisation" zu verstehen ist. Andererseits hatte ich gerade das Handbook on Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies von M.-A. Sicilia durchgeackert und dabei feststellen müssen, dass bei den Informatiker-Kollegen doch vielfach das Wissen fehlt, das immerhin schon seit Jahrhunderten in den Geisteswissenschaften auf dem Gebiet der Klassifikation entwickelt wurde. Sie haben wohl erkannt, dass ihre Daten auch Inhalte haben, und benutzen gern die Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri, die von Informationswissenschaftlern erstellt wurden, doch fehlen ihnen deren Grundlagen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 42(2015) no.3, S.190-195 (M. Kleineberg)
    Type
    m
  11. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.01 
    0.013743203 = product of:
  0.027486406 = sum of:
    0.027486406 = product of:
      0.04122961 = sum of:
        0.004032825 = weight(_text_:a in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004032825 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
        0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037196785 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
    Type
    a
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften : lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? (1996) 0.01 
    0.011860441 = product of:
  0.023720883 = sum of:
    0.023720883 = product of:
      0.035581324 = sum of:
        0.026563652 = weight(_text_:m in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026563652 = score(doc=3941,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
        0.009017671 = weight(_text_:a in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009017671 = score(doc=3941,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85
    Type
    a
  13. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view (1992) 0.01 
    0.009817731 = product of:
  0.019635461 = sum of:
    0.019635461 = product of:
      0.029453192 = sum of:
        0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018783338 = score(doc=2100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
        0.010669853 = weight(_text_:a in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010669853 = score(doc=2100,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The implications of contributions from philosophy of science to classification theory and the construction of a new universal classification system are discussed. Starting from the purposes of universal systems and what has been considered so far to serve as main classes of the six existing major universal systems, the following theories have been treated: Theory of (1) knowledge, (2) knowledge elements and units, (3) systems, (4) the science concept, (5) knowledge fields including criteria for their identification, (6) a logical syntax, (7) an overall structure of object and aspect areas. Concludingly an evaluation was made with special regard to the representability (notation) of such a theory-based universal concept system by computer and in telecommunication. This, as well as the heuristics contained in such a theory-based system facilitate its general applicability
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
    Type
    a
  14. Dahlberg, I.: Ontical structure and universal classification (1977) 0.01 
    0.00834815 = product of:
  0.0166963 = sum of:
    0.0166963 = product of:
      0.0500889 = sum of:
        0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0500889 = score(doc=3342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    m
  15. Dahlberg, I.: Principles for the construction of a universal classification system : a proposal (1978) 0.00 
    0.0027164116 = product of:
  0.005432823 = sum of:
    0.005432823 = product of:
      0.01629847 = sum of:
        0.01629847 = weight(_text_:a in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01629847 = score(doc=67,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  16. Dahlberg, I.: Einteilungsprinzipien von Klassifikationssystemen (1974) 0.00 
    0.0022404583 = product of:
  0.0044809165 = sum of:
    0.0044809165 = product of:
      0.013442749 = sum of:
        0.013442749 = weight(_text_:a in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013442749 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Ingetraut Dahlberg : a brief self report (1998) 0.00 
    0.0022404583 = product of:
  0.0044809165 = sum of:
    0.0044809165 = product of:
      0.013442749 = sum of:
        0.013442749 = weight(_text_:a in 2510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013442749 = score(doc=2510,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 2510, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2510)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ingetraut Dahlberg presents a brief description of her career and involvement with cataloguing and classification schemes
    Footnote
    Articles included in an issue devoted to part 1 of a 2 part series celebrating people who have been leaders in the field of cataloguing and classification
    Type
    a
  18. Dahlberg, I.: Toward establishment of compatibility between indexing languages (1981) 0.00 
    0.002195192 = product of:
  0.004390384 = sum of:
    0.004390384 = product of:
      0.013171151 = sum of:
        0.013171151 = weight(_text_:a in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013171151 = score(doc=5218,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Outlines previous work done in the field of compatibility between indexing langugaes (IL), and describes the scope, limitations and advantages of establishing compatibility between IL. Suggests methods for verbal comparisons between IL as well as generation of an alphabetical comparison matrix M1. Conceptual comparisons, however, demand a conceptual reorganization of M1 into a compatibiliy matrix M2 with its two alternatices, namely a system-related matrix M3 and a hierarchical matrix M4. In conclusion, the use of a compatibility matrix and organizational problems are described
    Type
    a
  19. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.00 
    0.0020164126 = product of:
  0.004032825 = sum of:
    0.004032825 = product of:
      0.012098475 = sum of:
        0.012098475 = weight(_text_:a in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012098475 = score(doc=2103,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
    Type
    a
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Knowledge organization : a new science? (2006) 0.00 
    0.001920793 = product of:
  0.003841586 = sum of:
    0.003841586 = product of:
      0.011524757 = sum of:
        0.011524757 = weight(_text_:a in 3375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011524757 = score(doc=3375,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3375, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3375)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In ISKO's name, the term "Knowledge Organization" (KO) denotes already the object and the activity area significant for the existence of any science. Both areas are outlined and their specific contents shown. Also a survey of its special subfields is given. The sciencetheoretical foundation of Knowledge Organization as a new scientific discipline is based on the propositional concept of science. Within a universal system of the sciences, KO has been regarded as a subfield of Science of Science. Concludingly it is proposed to find the necessary institution for work in concerted effort of scientists, knowledge organizers and terminologists on the collection, definition, and systematization of concepts of all subject fields, utilizing the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as the necessary categorizing structure.
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 37
  • e 34
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 69
  • m 3
  • More… Less…

Themes