Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

0.031482592 = product of:
  0.062965184 = sum of:
    0.062965184 = sum of:
      0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018783338 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.006985058 = weight(_text_:a in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.006985058 = score(doc=2680,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037196785 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This study provides evidence on the actual information-seeking behaviour of students in a digital scholarly environment, not what they thought they did. It also compares student information-seeking behaviour with that of other academic communities, and, in some cases, for practitioners. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered as part of CIBER's ongoing Virtual Scholar programme. In particular log data from two digital journals libraries, Blackwell Synergy and OhioLINK, and one e-book collection (Oxford Scholarship Online) are utilized. Findings - The study showed a distinctive form of information-seeking behaviour associated with students and differences between them and other members of the academic community. For example, students constituted the biggest users in terms of sessions and pages viewed, and they were more likely to undertake longer online sessions. Undergraduates and postgraduates were the most likely users of library links to access scholarly databases, suggesting an important "hot link" role for libraries. Originality/value - Few studies have focused on the actual (rather than perceived) information-seeking behaviour of students. The study fills that gap.

Date

23. 2.2009 17:22:41

Type

a

0.03110007 = product of:
  0.06220014 = sum of:
    0.06220014 = product of:
      0.09330021 = sum of:
        0.031305563 = weight(_text_:m in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031305563 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
        0.061994642 = weight(_text_:22 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061994642 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

26. 2.2008 19:22:51

Type

m

0.014757585 = product of:
  0.02951517 = sum of:
    0.02951517 = product of:
      0.08854551 = sum of:
        0.08854551 = weight(_text_:m in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08854551 = score(doc=1081,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.7776402 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type

m

0.012837349 = product of:
  0.025674699 = sum of:
    0.025674699 = product of:
      0.038512047 = sum of:
        0.007514726 = weight(_text_:a in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007514726 = score(doc=228,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
        0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030997321 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a brief, critical review of LISA PLaus: the CD-ROM database version of LISA and which includes the database of Current Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS). The review covers the DOS version only, as it appeared in the Summer 1996 CD-ROM, noting that the Windows version was planned for the future. Points to the way LISA has found its mark, if not its fortune, in LISA Plus and notes its strengths, including: ideal suitability for current awareness in library and information science (LIS); massive and convenient consolidation of the published LIS literature; and massive increase in coverage from 7.900 abstracts in 1993 to over 12.000 currently. Criticizes certain features of LISA Plus, notably: the OPTI-Ware search interface; the combination of 2 databases (LISA and CRLIS) in a single, searchable database; and certain unexpected effects caused by the building of the Subject and Free Text indexes. Points particularly to great lack of consistency in the indexes and the indexing (faults that were fully rectified by a complete overhaul of the data in Summer 1996). Notes that LISA Plus is the first port of call for both information researchers and information science students. The Windows version of LISA Plus was launched in Spring 1997

Date

9. 2.1997 18:44:22

Source

Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.3, A.161-162

Type

a

0.010021043 = product of:
  0.020042086 = sum of:
    0.020042086 = product of:
      0.030063128 = sum of:
        0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021913894 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
        0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008149235 = score(doc=696,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Nowadays, end-users have quick and direct access to massive amount of information available on the Net. However, this information is unorganized expecting users to be able to identify and evaluate it in accordance with their information needs. Subject based information Gateways SBIG, organized collections of networked information, provide users with a catalogue of authoritative Internet resources, which can be searched and/ or browsed. This paper provides an evaluation of one such gateway - the Art, Design, Architecture & Media Gateway ADAM. It provides information on who these users are, how often they use the service, what their reasons for use are, which search methods and services they prefer and what are the advantages and disadvantages of an online information service.

Type

a

0.00834815 = product of:
  0.0166963 = sum of:
    0.0166963 = product of:
      0.0500889 = sum of:
        0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 5654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0500889 = score(doc=5654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 5654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5654)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type

m

0.008181442 = product of:
  0.016362883 = sum of:
    0.016362883 = product of:
      0.024544325 = sum of:
        0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015652781 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
        0.008891543 = weight(_text_:a in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008891543 = score(doc=2017,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This article is an edited version of a report commissioned by the British Library and JISC to identify how the specialist researchers of the future (those born after 1993) are likely to access and interact with digital resources in five to ten years' time. The purpose is to investigate the impact of digital transition on the information behaviour of the Google Generation and to guide library and information services to anticipate and react to any new or emerging behaviours in the most effective way. Design/methodology/approach - The study was virtually longitudinal and is based on a number of extensive reviews of related literature, survey data mining and a deep log analysis of a British Library and a JISC web site intended for younger people. Findings - The study shows that much of the impact of ICTs on the young has been overestimated. The study claims that although young people demonstrate an apparent ease and familiarity with computers, they rely heavily on search engines, view rather than read and do not possess the critical and analytical skills to assess the information that they find on the web. Originality/value - The paper reports on a study that overturns the common assumption that the "Google generation" is the most web-literate.

Type

a

0.008162205 = product of:
  0.01632441 = sum of:
    0.01632441 = product of:
      0.024486614 = sum of:
        0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018783338 = score(doc=1745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
        0.005703276 = weight(_text_:a in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005703276 = score(doc=1745,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This work tackles one of the fundamental problems of information management - how to get the right information to the right person at the right time. It provides a practical framework to enable information services to gather information from users in order to aid information system design, and to monitor the effectiveness of an information service. This new edition has been fully revised and now has increased coverage of the Internet. The Web raises many problems when it comes to meeting information needs - authority and overload, for example - and these problems make an effective information needs analysis even more crucial. There is a new methodology section on Web log analysis and focus group interviews. Practical advice is given concerning interview technique and an interview schedule is included.

Type

m

0.007304631 = product of:
  0.014609262 = sum of:
    0.014609262 = product of:
      0.043827787 = sum of:
        0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043827787 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type

m

0.007304631 = product of:
  0.014609262 = sum of:
    0.014609262 = product of:
      0.043827787 = sum of:
        0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043827787 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type

m

0.002195192 = product of:
  0.004390384 = sum of:
    0.004390384 = product of:
      0.013171151 = sum of:
        0.013171151 = weight(_text_:a in 6592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013171151 = score(doc=6592,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 6592, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6592)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents the results of a survey of 36 banking and finance institutions in the UK on their information professionals' use of the Internet as a source of business information. The survey revealed that less than a third are currently using the Internet. Discusses the disadvantages and advantages of the Internet both as an information source and in terms of management. At the moment the Internet is a complementary information source although in the future it may become an entry-point to other information sources

Type

a

0.0020164126 = product of:
  0.004032825 = sum of:
    0.004032825 = product of:
      0.012098475 = sum of:
        0.012098475 = weight(_text_:a in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012098475 = score(doc=4440,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Collating data from a number of log and questionnaire studies conducted largely into the use of a range of consumer health digital information platforms, Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (Ciber) researchers describe some new thoughts on characterising (and naming) information seeking behaviour in the digital environment, and in so doing, suggest a new typology of digital users. The characteristic behaviour found is one of bouncing in which users seldom penetrate a site to any depth, tend to visit a number of sites for any given information need and seldom return to sites they once visited. They tend to "feed" for information horizontally, and whether they search a site of not depends heavily on "digital visibility", which in turn creates all the conditions for "bouncing". The question whether this type of information seeking represents a form of "dumbing down or up", and what it all means for publishers, librarians and information providers, who might be working on other, possible outdated usage paradigms, is discussed.

Type

a

0.002003927 = product of:
  0.004007854 = sum of:
    0.004007854 = product of:
      0.012023562 = sum of:
        0.012023562 = weight(_text_:a in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012023562 = score(doc=450,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Outlines a structure for analysing information needs. The purpose of the structure is to enable data on users to be collected in a systematic and routine manner. The form of analysis is demonstrated through a consideration of the information needs of newspaper journalists. Aspects of information need considered are: subject, nature, function, viewpoint, authority, quantity, quality, place of origin, speed of delivery, and processing/packaging. Considers the barriers to meeting information needs and training, time, resources, access and information overload. Also assesses the library's role in meeting information needs

Type

a

0.002003927 = product of:
  0.004007854 = sum of:
    0.004007854 = product of:
      0.012023562 = sum of:
        0.012023562 = weight(_text_:a in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012023562 = score(doc=2040,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Metrics derived from user visits or sessions provide a means of evaluating Websites and an important insight into online information seeking behaviour, the most important of them being the duration of sessions and the number of pages viewed in a session, a possible busyness indicator. However, the identification of session (termed often 'sessionization') is fraught with difficulty in that there is no way of determining from a transactional log file that a user has ended their session. No one logs out. Instead a session delimiter has to be applied and this is typically done on the basis of a standard period of inactivity. To date researchers have discussed the issue of a time out delimiter in terms of a single value and if a page view time exceeds the cut-off value the session is deemed to have ended. This approach assumes that page view time is a single distribution and that the cut-off value is one point on that distribution. The authors however argue that page time distribution is composed of a number of quite separate view time distributions because of the marked differences in view times between pages (abstract, contents page, full text). This implies that a number of timeout delimiters should be applied. Employing data from a study of the OhioLINK digital journal library, the authors demonstrate how the setting of a time out delimiter impacts on the estimate of page view time and the number of estimated session. Furthermore, they also show how a number of timeout delimiters might apply and they argue that this gives a better and more robust estimate of the number of sessions, session time and page view time compared to an application of a single timeout delimiter.

Type

a

0.001901092 = product of:
  0.003802184 = sum of:
    0.003802184 = product of:
      0.011406552 = sum of:
        0.011406552 = weight(_text_:a in 6141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011406552 = score(doc=6141,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6141, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6141)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type

a

0.00185769 = product of:
  0.00371538 = sum of:
    0.00371538 = product of:
      0.01114614 = sum of:
        0.01114614 = weight(_text_:a in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01114614 = score(doc=925,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The paper delineates and explains an emerging, but significant, form of digital information seeking behaviour among information consumers, which the authors have called 'bouncing'. The evidence for this behaviour has emerged from five years of deep log analysis studies - an advanced form of transaction log analysis - of a wide range of users of digital information resources. Much of the evidence and discussion provided comes from the scholarly communication field. Two main bouncing metrics were applied in the log studies: site penetration, which is the number of items or pages viewed in a session, and return visits. The evidence shows that (1) a high proportion of people view just a few items or pages during a visit to a site and, (2) a high proportion of visitors either do not come back to the site or they did so infrequently. Typically those who penetrated a site least tended to return the least frequently. These people are termed 'bouncers'. They bounce into the site and then bounce out again, presumably, to another site, as a high proportion of them do not appear to come back again. Possible explanations - negative and positive, for the form of behaviour are discussed.

Type

a

0.0017534362 = product of:
  0.0035068723 = sum of:
    0.0035068723 = product of:
      0.010520617 = sum of:
        0.010520617 = weight(_text_:a in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010520617 = score(doc=675,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Touch-screen kiosks are located in a variety of locations to provide the public with ready access to health information. This paper examines, via a questionnaire, the characteristics of adult users of a surgery-based kiosk. The Esk Medical Centre is in Musselburgh, near Edinburgh. Just under 200 questionnaires were returned and analysed. The research establishes characteristics of users and non-users, how the kiosk fits in with other consumer information sources, what health outcomes result from using the kiosk, and reasons for non-use. The main finding is that the respondents' attitude and previous experience with information technology has an impact on whether the touch-screen kiosk is used.

Type

a

0.0017534362 = product of:
  0.0035068723 = sum of:
    0.0035068723 = product of:
      0.010520617 = sum of:
        0.010520617 = weight(_text_:a in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010520617 = score(doc=688,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Evaluates, through deep log analysis, the impact of "Big Deal" agreements on the online searching behaviour of users of the Emerald digital library Web site, which provides access to more than 150 journals in the fields of business and information science. The purpose of the evaluation was to map the online information seeking behaviour of the digital library user and to see whether those signed-up to a Big Deal arrangement behaved any differently from the others. In general they did. The real surprise proved to be the strong consumer traits of the library's users. Research reported here refers to the first stage of a three-stage research project.

Type

a

0.0016803439 = product of:
  0.0033606878 = sum of:
    0.0033606878 = product of:
      0.010082063 = sum of:
        0.010082063 = weight(_text_:a in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010082063 = score(doc=1911,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.

Type

a

0.0015842434 = product of:
  0.0031684868 = sum of:
    0.0031684868 = product of:
      0.00950546 = sum of:
        0.00950546 = weight(_text_:a in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00950546 = score(doc=5605,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project funded by the US Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original "big deal", provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journal for more than 600,000 people in the state of Ohio. The purpose of the paper is not only to present findings from the deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, but, arguably more importantly, to try test a new method of analysing online information user behaviour - deep log analysis. Design/methodology/approach - The raw server logs were obtained for the period June 2004 to December 2004. For this exploratory study one month (October) of the on-campus usage logs and seven months of the off-campus transaction logs were analysed. Findings - During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. The paper presents a number of usage analyses including: number of journals used, titles of journals used, use over time, a returnee analysis and a special analysis of subject, date and method of access. Practical implications - The research findings help libraries evaluate the efficiency of big deal and one-stop shopping for scholarly journals and also investigate their users' information seeking behaviours. Originality/value - The research is a part of efforts to test the applications of a new methodology, deep log analysis, for use and user studies. It also represents the most substantial independent analysis of, possibly, the most important and significant of the journal big deals ever conducted.

Type

a