Search (56 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  1. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.04
    0.038545407 = product of:
      0.077090815 = sum of:
        0.077090815 = sum of:
          0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018783338 = score(doc=1967,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.005703276 = weight(_text_:a in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005703276 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.052604202 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052604202 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Type
    a
  2. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007) 0.04
    0.037320085 = product of:
      0.07464017 = sum of:
        0.07464017 = product of:
          0.11196025 = sum of:
            0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037566677 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
            0.07439357 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07439357 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  3. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.04
    0.035981983 = product of:
      0.071963966 = sum of:
        0.071963966 = sum of:
          0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021913894 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
          0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0066538225 = score(doc=4346,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
          0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04339625 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
    Type
    a
  4. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.03
    0.034677744 = product of:
      0.06935549 = sum of:
        0.06935549 = sum of:
          0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018783338 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.013375368 = weight(_text_:a in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013375368 = score(doc=1347,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.25351265 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037196785 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
    Type
    a
  5. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.03
    0.032655247 = product of:
      0.06531049 = sum of:
        0.06531049 = sum of:
          0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015652781 = score(doc=1962,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.005820882 = weight(_text_:a in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005820882 = score(doc=1962,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.043836832 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043836832 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
    Type
    a
  6. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.03
    0.032498896 = product of:
      0.06499779 = sum of:
        0.06499779 = sum of:
          0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018783338 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.009017671 = weight(_text_:a in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009017671 = score(doc=2610,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037196785 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  7. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.03
    0.032022886 = product of:
      0.06404577 = sum of:
        0.06404577 = sum of:
          0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018783338 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
          0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00806565 = score(doc=1464,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
          0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037196785 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  8. Zumer, M.: User interfaces of national bibliographies on CD-ROM : results of a survey (2000) 0.02
    0.019045144 = product of:
      0.03809029 = sum of:
        0.03809029 = product of:
          0.057135433 = sum of:
            0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 4896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043827787 = score(doc=4896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 4896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4896)
            0.013307645 = weight(_text_:a in 4896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013307645 = score(doc=4896,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 4896, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4896)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  9. Pauman Budanovi, M.; Zumer, M.: Investigating mental models of cataloguers as the first step towards the development of intuitive cataloguer's tools (2015) 0.02
    0.016998043 = product of:
      0.033996087 = sum of:
        0.033996087 = product of:
          0.050994128 = sum of:
            0.044272754 = weight(_text_:m in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044272754 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3888201 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
            0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067213746 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  10. Brito, M(arcilio), de; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.; Bastos Vieira, S.; Brito, M(arcos), de: Document representation with images : an experimental milestone (2018) 0.02
    0.016251788 = product of:
      0.032503575 = sum of:
        0.032503575 = product of:
          0.04875536 = sum of:
            0.04337826 = weight(_text_:m in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04337826 = score(doc=4694,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.38096434 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
            0.0053771 = weight(_text_:a in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053771 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Zumer, M.: Dedication [to Zlata Dimec] (2004) 0.02
    0.015210776 = product of:
      0.030421551 = sum of:
        0.030421551 = product of:
          0.045632325 = sum of:
            0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037566677 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
            0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00806565 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  12. Brito, M. de; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.; Bastos Vieira, S.: Indexing with images : the imagetic conceptual methodology (2016) 0.01
    0.014910538 = product of:
      0.029821075 = sum of:
        0.029821075 = product of:
          0.044731613 = sum of:
            0.0354182 = weight(_text_:m in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0354182 = score(doc=4919,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.31105608 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
            0.009313411 = weight(_text_:a in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313411 = score(doc=4919,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
    Type
    a
  13. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: ¬The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and knowledge organization (2003) 0.01
    0.0134669505 = product of:
      0.026933901 = sum of:
        0.026933901 = product of:
          0.04040085 = sum of:
            0.030990927 = weight(_text_:m in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030990927 = score(doc=2699,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
            0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009409925 = score(doc=2699,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR, 1998), the study commissioned by IFLA, brings revolutionary changes in the way we see modern computer catalogues. The catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a copy of a card catalogue, but as an interconnected network of related information. Implications of the new model for the future development of catalogues are discussed. Special attention is given to access points and relationships between entities and the changes those will bring into both the formal and subject cataloguing, and authority files.
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
    Type
    a
  14. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 1 : conceptual design (2021) 0.01
    0.013046721 = product of:
      0.026093442 = sum of:
        0.026093442 = product of:
          0.03914016 = sum of:
            0.030990927 = weight(_text_:m in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030990927 = score(doc=700,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
            0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149235 = score(doc=700,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to present a prototype cataloging interface, which provides easier data entry, follows the cataloger's thought process and is based on the advantages of the IFLA LRM model. The paper summarizes all stages of the conceptual design and shows how the LRM was implemented. The main purpose of the cataloging interface design is to show how a LRM-based cataloging module might look like and how it could improve the existing cataloging process.
    Type
    a
  15. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 2 : usability evaluation (2021) 0.01
    0.012548249 = product of:
      0.025096498 = sum of:
        0.025096498 = product of:
          0.037644748 = sum of:
            0.030990927 = weight(_text_:m in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030990927 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
            0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066538225 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on usability evaluation that was carried out to evaluate the LRM-based prototype interface, presented in Part 1. A combination of focus group, Wizard of Oz method, and think-aloud protocol was used. The study was conducted in May 2019 with seven Slovenian catalogers from Maribor Public Library. Although participants had some difficulties understanding the LRM model, the user interface proved to be quite easy to use, quick to understand, and transparent. The functionality of the proposed prototype proved to be adequate, since the catalogers successfully and independently completed all the tasks without major problems and errors.
    Type
    a
  16. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Salaba, A.: FRSAD: conceptual modeling of aboutness (2012) 0.01
    0.011898629 = product of:
      0.023797259 = sum of:
        0.023797259 = product of:
          0.035695888 = sum of:
            0.030990927 = weight(_text_:m in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030990927 = score(doc=1960,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
            0.0047049625 = weight(_text_:a in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047049625 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  17. Zumer, M.; Zeng, L.: Comparison and evaluation of OPAC end-user interfaces (1994) 0.01
    0.011452621 = product of:
      0.022905242 = sum of:
        0.022905242 = product of:
          0.03435786 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
            0.009313411 = weight(_text_:a in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313411 = score(doc=3568,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Compares and evaluates the functional capabilities and interface characteristics of OPACs from the user oriented perspective, using a systematic framework. OPACs of OhioLINK and its 16 member libraries are the object of the investigation. The interfaces used 6 system software but showed a variety of features in access to OPACs, operational control, access points, search formulation control, and user assistance. Interface design alternatives are identified and qualitatively analyzed
    Type
    a
  18. Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013) 0.01
    0.011452621 = product of:
      0.022905242 = sum of:
        0.022905242 = product of:
          0.03435786 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
            0.009313411 = weight(_text_:a in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313411 = score(doc=1955,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD models propose user tasks as a way to address and categorize functions that a catalog should support. The user tasks are not harmonized among these models, but to do that, they should first be fully understood and analyzed, especially "select" and "identify." We decided to look at the FRBR user tasks from the perspective of interactive information retrieval (IIR). Several IIR models were reviewed and Ellis' and Belkin's models were chosen for further analysis and interpretation of FRBR "select" and "identify" tasks.
    Type
    a
  19. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬The new FRBR-LRM model : some accents (2016) 0.01
    0.011452621 = product of:
      0.022905242 = sum of:
        0.022905242 = product of:
          0.03435786 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
            0.009313411 = weight(_text_:a in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313411 = score(doc=4940,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
    Type
    a
  20. Riva, P.; Doerr, M.; Zumer, M.: FRBRoo: enabling a common view of information from memory institutions (2008) 0.01
    0.010921269 = product of:
      0.021842537 = sum of:
        0.021842537 = product of:
          0.032763805 = sum of:
            0.022136377 = weight(_text_:m in 3743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022136377 = score(doc=3743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 3743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3743)
            0.010627427 = weight(_text_:a in 3743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010627427 = score(doc=3743,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 3743, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3743)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 2008 the FRBR/CRM Harmonisation Working Group has achieved a major milestone: a complete version of the object-oriented definition of FRBR (FRBRoo) was released for comment. After a brief overview of the history and context of the Working Group, this paper focuses on the primary contributions resulting from this work. - FRBRoo is a self-contained document which expresses the concepts of FRBR using the objectoriented methodology and framework of CIDOC CRM. It is an alternative view on library conceptualisation for a different purpose, not a replacement for FRBR. - This 'translation' process presented an opportunity to verify and confirm FRBR's internal consistency. - FRBRoo offers a common view of library and museum documentation as two kinds of information from memory institutions. Such a common view is necessary to provide interoperable information systems for all users interested in accessing common or related content. - The analysis provided an opportunity for mutual enrichment of FRBR and CIDOC CRM. Examples include: - - Addition of the modelling of time and events to FRBR, which can be seen in its application to the publishing process - - Clarification of the manifestation entity - - Explicit modelling of performances and recordings in FRBR - - Adding the work entity to CRM - - Adding the identifier assignment process to CRM. - Producing a formalisation which is more suited for implementation with object-oriented tools, and which facilitates the testing and adoption of FRBR concepts in implementations with different functional specifications and in different environments.