-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.05
0.05001079 = product of:
0.10002158 = sum of:
0.10002158 = sum of:
0.031305563 = weight(_text_:m in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031305563 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067213746 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.061994642 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061994642 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.04
0.04333186 = product of:
0.08666372 = sum of:
0.08666372 = sum of:
0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02504445 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.012023562 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012023562 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Type
- a
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.04
0.042697184 = product of:
0.08539437 = sum of:
0.08539437 = sum of:
0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02504445 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0107542 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
- Type
- a
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.04
0.042697184 = product of:
0.08539437 = sum of:
0.08539437 = sum of:
0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02504445 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0107542 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
- Type
- a
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.04
0.041976787 = product of:
0.083953574 = sum of:
0.083953574 = sum of:
0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02504445 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.009313411 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009313411 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049595714 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
- Type
- a
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.04
0.038879152 = product of:
0.077758305 = sum of:
0.077758305 = sum of:
0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021913894 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.012448162 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012448162 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339625 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
- Type
- a
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.04
0.03841745 = product of:
0.0768349 = sum of:
0.0768349 = sum of:
0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021913894 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.011524757 = weight(_text_:a in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011524757 = score(doc=3383,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339625 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.04
0.03775802 = product of:
0.07551604 = sum of:
0.07551604 = product of:
0.11327405 = sum of:
0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00806565 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.105208404 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.105208404 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
- Type
- a
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.04
0.03664854 = product of:
0.07329708 = sum of:
0.07329708 = product of:
0.109945625 = sum of:
0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0107542 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.09919143 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09919143 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
- Type
- a
-
Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004)
0.04
0.035981983 = product of:
0.071963966 = sum of:
0.071963966 = sum of:
0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021913894 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066538225 = score(doc=2843,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339625 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
- Type
- a
-
Pfister, E.; Wittwer, B.; Wolff, M.: Metadaten - Manuelle Datenpflege vs. Automatisieren : ein Praxisbericht zu Metadatenmanagement an der ETH-Bibliothek (2017)
0.04
0.03500755 = product of:
0.0700151 = sum of:
0.0700151 = sum of:
0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021913894 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
0.0047049625 = weight(_text_:a in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047049625 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04339625 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.1, S.22-25
- Type
- a
-
Margaritopoulos, T.; Margaritopoulos, M.; Mavridis, I.; Manitsaris, A.: ¬A conceptual framework for metadata quality assessment (2008)
0.03
0.033693336 = product of:
0.06738667 = sum of:
0.06738667 = sum of:
0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018783338 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.011406552 = weight(_text_:a in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011406552 = score(doc=2643,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037196785 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata quality of digital resources in a repository is an issue directly associated with the repository's efficiency and value. In this paper, the subject of metadata quality is approached by introducing a new conceptual framework that defines it in terms of its fundamental components. Additionally, a method for assessing these components by exploiting structural and semantic relations among the resources is presented. These relations can be used to generate implied logic rules, which include, impose or prohibit certain values in the fields of a metadata record. The use of such rules can serve as a tool for conducting quality control in the records, in order to diagnose deficiencies and errors.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
- Type
- a
-
Zavalina, O.; Palmer, C.L.; Jackson, A.S.; Han, M.-J.: Assessing descriptive substance in free-text collection-level metadata (2008)
0.03
0.03292924 = product of:
0.06585848 = sum of:
0.06585848 = sum of:
0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018783338 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.009878363 = weight(_text_:a in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009878363 = score(doc=2647,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037196785 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collection-level metadata has the potential to provide important information about the features and purpose of individual collections. This paper reports on a content analysis of collection records in an aggregation of cultural heritage collections. The findings show that the free-text Description field often provides more accurate and complete representation of subjects and object types than the specified fields. Properties such as importance, uniqueness, comprehensiveness, provenance, and creator are articulated, as well as other vital contextual information about the intentions of a collector and the value of a collection, as a whole, for scholarly users. The results demonstrate that the semantically rich free-text Description field is essential to understanding the context of collections in large aggregations and can serve as a source of data for enhancing and customizing controlled vocabularies.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
- Type
- a
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.03
0.032498896 = product of:
0.06499779 = sum of:
0.06499779 = sum of:
0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018783338 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.009017671 = weight(_text_:a in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009017671 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037196785 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
- Type
- a
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.03
0.032067478 = product of:
0.064134955 = sum of:
0.064134955 = product of:
0.096202426 = sum of:
0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009409925 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.0867925 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0867925 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
- Type
- a
-
Keßler, M.: KIM - Kompetenzzentrum Interoperable Metadaten : Gemeinsamer Workshop der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und des Arbeitskreises Elektronisches Publizieren (AKEP) (2007)
0.03
0.030006474 = product of:
0.060012948 = sum of:
0.060012948 = sum of:
0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018783338 = score(doc=2406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
0.004032825 = weight(_text_:a in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004032825 = score(doc=2406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037196785 = score(doc=2406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 20(2008) H.1, S.22-24
- Type
- a
-
Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005)
0.03
0.027770823 = product of:
0.055541646 = sum of:
0.055541646 = sum of:
0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015652781 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.008891543 = weight(_text_:a in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008891543 = score(doc=124,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030997321 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- a
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.03
0.027770028 = product of:
0.055540055 = sum of:
0.055540055 = product of:
0.08331008 = sum of:
0.013171151 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013171151 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.07013893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07013893 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
- Type
- a
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.03
0.02517201 = product of:
0.05034402 = sum of:
0.05034402 = product of:
0.07551603 = sum of:
0.0053771 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053771 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.07013893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07013893 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
- Type
- a
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.02
0.024545468 = product of:
0.049090937 = sum of:
0.049090937 = product of:
0.073636405 = sum of:
0.011641764 = weight(_text_:a in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011641764 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.061994642 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061994642 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045757167 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
