Search (114 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.05
    0.05001079 = product of:
      0.10002158 = sum of:
        0.10002158 = sum of:
          0.031305563 = weight(_text_:m in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031305563 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0067213746 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.061994642 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061994642 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
    Type
    m
  2. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.03
    0.028077781 = product of:
      0.056155562 = sum of:
        0.056155562 = sum of:
          0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015652781 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.00950546 = weight(_text_:a in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00950546 = score(doc=3739,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030997321 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045757167 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is experimenting with a knowledge organization system based on phenomena rather than disciplines. Each phenomenon has a constant notation, which can be combined with that of any other phenomenon in a freely faceted structure. Citation order can express differential focality of the facets. Very specific subjects can have long classmarks, although their complexity is reduced by various devices. Freely faceted classification is being tested by indexing a corpus of about 3300 papers in the interdisciplinary domain of bioacoustics. The subjects of these papers often include phenomena from a wide variety of integrative levels (mechanical waves, animals, behaviour, vessels, fishing, law, ...) as well as information about the methods of study, as predicted in the León Manifesto. The archive is recorded in a MySQL database, and can be fed and searched through PHP Web interfaces. Indexer's work is made easier by mechanisms that suggest possible classes on the basis of matching title words with terms in the ILC schedules, and synthesize automatically the verbal caption corresponding to the classmark being edited. Users can search the archive by selecting and combining values in each facet. Search refinement should be improved, especially for the cases where no record, or too many records, match the faceted query. However, experience is being gained progressively, showing that freely faceted classification by phenomena, theories, and methods is feasible and successfully working.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  3. Satija, M. P.: Use of Colon Classification (1986) 0.02
    0.020281035 = product of:
      0.04056207 = sum of:
        0.04056207 = product of:
          0.060843103 = sum of:
            0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0500889 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
            0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0107542 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Grolier, E. de: ¬A study of general categories applicable to classification and coding in documentation (1962) 0.02
    0.020281035 = product of:
      0.04056207 = sum of:
        0.04056207 = product of:
          0.060843103 = sum of:
            0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 3388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0500889 = score(doc=3388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3388)
            0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 3388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0107542 = score(doc=3388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3388)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  5. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.02
    0.019066695 = product of:
      0.03813339 = sum of:
        0.03813339 = product of:
          0.05720008 = sum of:
            0.007604368 = weight(_text_:a in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604368 = score(doc=826,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
            0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049595714 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  6. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.02
    0.01832427 = product of:
      0.03664854 = sum of:
        0.03664854 = product of:
          0.054972813 = sum of:
            0.0053771 = weight(_text_:a in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053771 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
            0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049595714 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
    Type
    a
  7. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.02
    0.017972289 = product of:
      0.035944577 = sum of:
        0.035944577 = product of:
          0.053916864 = sum of:
            0.010520617 = weight(_text_:a in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010520617 = score(doc=632,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
            0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339625 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
    Content
    This paper is an adaptation and augmented version of a paper presented at the NASKO 2011 conference: Charles van den Heuvel. 2011. Multidimensional classifications: Past and future conceptualizations and visualizations. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 105-21. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_6_e.pdf.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
    Type
    a
  8. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.02
    0.017181829 = product of:
      0.034363657 = sum of:
        0.034363657 = product of:
          0.051545486 = sum of:
            0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149235 = score(doc=4227,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
            0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339625 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present three fundamental, interrelated approaches to support multiple access paths to each terminal object in information hierarchies: faceted classification, faceted search, and web directories with embedded symbolic links. This survey aims to demonstrate how each approach supports users who seek information from multiple perspectives. We achieve this by exploring each approach, the relationships between these approaches, including tradeoffs, and how they can be used in concert, while focusing on a core set of hypermedia elements common to all. This approach provides a foundation from which to study, understand, and synthesize applications which employ these techniques. This survey does not aim to be comprehensive, but rather focuses on thematic issues.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
    Type
    a
  9. Foskett, D.J.: Classification for a general index language: a review of recent research by the Classification Research Group (1970) 0.02
    0.01632441 = product of:
      0.03264882 = sum of:
        0.03264882 = product of:
          0.04897323 = sum of:
            0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037566677 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
            0.011406552 = weight(_text_:a in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406552 = score(doc=3403,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  10. Scheele, M.: ¬Die universelle Facetten-Classifikation (UFC) und ihre mögliche Bedeutung für Allgemeinbildung, Terminologieforschung und Informationswesen (1978) 0.02
    0.015210776 = product of:
      0.030421551 = sum of:
        0.030421551 = product of:
          0.045632325 = sum of:
            0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037566677 = score(doc=66,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
            0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00806565 = score(doc=66,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Aschero, B.; Negrini, G.; Zanola, R.; Zozi, P.: Systematifier : a guide for the systematization of Italian literature (1995) 0.01
    0.013603675 = product of:
      0.02720735 = sum of:
        0.02720735 = product of:
          0.040811025 = sum of:
            0.031305563 = weight(_text_:m in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031305563 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
            0.00950546 = weight(_text_:a in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00950546 = score(doc=4128,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt /M. : Indeks
    Type
    a
  12. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.01
    0.0125728985 = product of:
      0.025145797 = sum of:
        0.025145797 = product of:
          0.037718695 = sum of:
            0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067213746 = score(doc=1418,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
            0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997321 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Categories, or concepts of high generality representing the most basic kinds of entities in the world, have long been understood to be a fundamental element in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), particularly faceted ones. Commentators on facet analysis have tended to foreground the role of categories in the structuring of controlled vocabularies and the construction of compound index terms, and the implications of this for subject representation and information retrieval. Less attention has been paid to the variety of ways in which categories can shape the overall architectonic framework of a KOS. This case study explores the range of functions that categories took in structuring various aspects of an early analytico-synthetic KOS, Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI). Within SI, categories not only functioned as mechanisms to partition an index vocabulary into smaller groupings of terms and as elements in the construction of compound index terms but also served as means of defining the units of indexing, or index items, incorporated into an index; determining the organization of card index files and the articulation of the guide card system serving as a navigational aids thereto; and setting structural constraints to the establishment of cross-references between terms. In all these ways, Kaiser's system of categories contributed to the general systematicity of SI.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  13. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.01
    0.012272734 = product of:
      0.024545468 = sum of:
        0.024545468 = product of:
          0.036818203 = sum of:
            0.005820882 = weight(_text_:a in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005820882 = score(doc=1417,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
            0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997321 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, Hjørland has developed a typology of basic epistemological approaches to KO that identifies four basic positions - empiricism, rationalism, historicism/hermeneutics, and pragmatism -with which to characterize the epistemological bases and methodological orientation of KOSs. Although scholars of KO have noted that the design of a single KOS may incorporate epistemological-methodological features from more than one of these approaches, studies of concrete examples of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism have been rare. In this paper, we consider the phenomenon of epistemologico-methodological eclecticism in one theoretically significant family of KOSs - namely analytico-synthetic, or faceted, KOSs - by examining two cases - Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI) and Brian Vickery's method of facet analysis (FA) for document classification. We show that both of these systems combined classical features of rationalism with elements of empiricism and pragmatism and argue that such eclecticism is the norm, rather than the exception, for such KOSs in general.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  14. Hudon, M.; Fortier, A.: Facet : itself a multifaceted concept (2018) 0.01
    0.011452621 = product of:
      0.022905242 = sum of:
        0.022905242 = product of:
          0.03435786 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 4741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=4741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4741)
            0.009313411 = weight(_text_:a in 4741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313411 = score(doc=4741,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4741, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4741)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  15. Barité, M.; Rauch, M.: Systematifier : in rescue of a useful tool in domain analysis (2017) 0.01
    0.010739481 = product of:
      0.021478962 = sum of:
        0.021478962 = product of:
          0.03221844 = sum of:
            0.022136377 = weight(_text_:m in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022136377 = score(doc=4142,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
            0.010082063 = weight(_text_:a in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010082063 = score(doc=4142,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Literature on the systematifier is remarkably limited in knowledge organization. Dahlberg created the procedure in the seventies as a guide for the construction of classification systems and showed its applicability in systems she developed. According to her initial conception, all disciplines should be structured in the following sequence: Foundations and theories-Subjects of study-Methods-Influences-Applications-Environment. The nature of the procedure is determined in this study and the concept is situated in relation with the domain analysis methodologies. As a tool for the organization of the map of a certain domain, it is associated with a rationalist perspective and the top-down design of systems construction. It would require a reassessment of its scope in order to ensure its applicability to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary domains. Among other conclusions, it is highlighted that the greatest potential of the systematifier is given by the fact that-as a methodological device-it can act as: i)an analyzer of a subject area; ii)an organizer of its main terms; and, iii)an identifier of links, bridges and intersection points with other knowledge areas.
    Type
    a
  16. Milonas, E.: ¬The use of facets in Web search engines 0.01
    0.010441273 = product of:
      0.020882547 = sum of:
        0.020882547 = product of:
          0.03132382 = sum of:
            0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 3545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021913894 = score(doc=3545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 3545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3545)
            0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 3545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009409925 = score(doc=3545,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3545, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3545)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web consists of a plethora of information that a Web searcher can retrieve via Web search engines such as Google. These Web search engines display an insurmountable amount of information in a seemingly unorganized linear format. Recently, some Web search engines have incorporated facets or terms alongside the linear display allowing the searcher the ability to narrow search results. The goal of this study is to examine the use of facets in these Web search engines.
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
    Type
    a
  17. Kaiser, J.: Systematic indexing (1911) 0.01
    0.010435188 = product of:
      0.020870376 = sum of:
        0.020870376 = product of:
          0.062611125 = sum of:
            0.062611125 = weight(_text_:m in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062611125 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.54987466 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  18. Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017) 0.01
    0.010122783 = product of:
      0.020245565 = sum of:
        0.020245565 = product of:
          0.030368347 = sum of:
            0.022136377 = weight(_text_:m in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022136377 = score(doc=4154,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
            0.00823197 = weight(_text_:a in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00823197 = score(doc=4154,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The identification and contextual definition of concepts is the core of knowledge organization. The full expression of comprehension is accomplished through the use of an extension device called the facet. A facet is a category of dimensional characteristics that cross the hierarchical array of concepts to provide extension, or breadth, to the contexts in which they are discovered or expressed in knowledge organization systems. The use of the facet in knowledge organization has a rich history arising in the mid-nineteenth century. As it has matured through more than a century of application, the notion of the facet in knowledge organization has taken on a variety of meanings, from that of simple categories used in web search engines to the more sophisticated idea of intersecting dimensions of knowledge. This book describes the state of the art of the understanding of facets in knowledge organization today.
    Content
    Inhalt: Richard P. Smiraglia: A Brief Introduction to Facets in Knowledge Organization / Kathryn La Barre: Interrogating Facet Theory: Decolonizing Knowledge Organization / Joseph T. Tennis: Never Facets Alone: The Evolving Thought and Persistent Problems in Ranganathan's Theories of Classification / M. P. Satija and Dong-Guen Oh: The DDC and the Knowledge Categories: Dewey did Faceting without Knowing It / Claudio Gnoli: Classifying Phenomena Part 3: Facets / Rick Szostak: Facet Analysis Without Facet Indicators / Elizabeth Milonas: An Examination of Facets within Search Engine Result Pages / Richard P. Smiraglia: Facets for Clustering and Disambiguation: The Domain Discourse of Facets in Knowledge Organization
    Type
    m
  19. Hudon, M.: Facet (2020) 0.01
    0.010021043 = product of:
      0.020042086 = sum of:
        0.020042086 = product of:
          0.030063128 = sum of:
            0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021913894 = score(doc=5899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
            0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149235 = score(doc=5899,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    S.R. Ranganathan is credited with the introduction of the term "facet" in the field of knowledge organization towards the middle of the twentieth century. Facets have traditionally been used to organize document collections and to express complex subjects. In the digital world, they act as filters to facilitate navigation and improve retrieval. But the popularity of the term does not mean that a definitive characterization of the concept has been established. Indeed, several conceptualizations of the facet co-exist. This article provides an overview of formal and informal definitions found in the literature of knowledge organization, followed by a discussion of four common conceptualizations of the facet: process vs product, nature vs function, object vs subject and organization vs navigation.
    Type
    a
  20. Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments 0.01
    0.009553901 = product of:
      0.019107802 = sum of:
        0.019107802 = product of:
          0.028661702 = sum of:
            0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018783338 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
            0.009878363 = weight(_text_:a in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009878363 = score(doc=3532,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Bliss Bibliographic Classification is the only example of a fully faceted general classification scheme in the Western world. Although it is the object of much interest as a model for other tools it suffers from the lack of a web presence, and remedying this is an immediate objective for its editors. Understanding how this might be done presents some challenges, as the scheme is semantically very rich and complex in the range and nature of the relationships it contains. The automatic management of these is already in place using local software, but exporting this to a common data format needs careful thought and planning. Various encoding schemes, both for traditional classifications, and for digital materials, represent variously: the concepts; their functional roles; and the relationships between them. Integrating these aspects in a coherent and interchangeable manner appears to be achievable, but the most appropriate format is as yet unclear.
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 107
  • d 6
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 93
  • m 13
  • el 9
  • s 4
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…