Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.05
    0.046066653 = product of:
      0.092133306 = sum of:
        0.092133306 = sum of:
          0.055145252 = weight(_text_:p in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055145252 = score(doc=3060,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045500398 = queryNorm
              0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.036988053 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036988053 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045500398 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Alon Friedman und Richard P. Smiraglia kündigen in ihrem aktuellen Artikel "Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization" an, eine "empirical demonstration of how the domain [of knowledge organisation] itself understands the meaning of a concept" durchzuführen. Die Klärung des Konzeptbegriffs ist ein begrüßenswertes Vorhaben, das die Autoren in einer empirischen Untersuchung von concept maps (also Konzeptdiagrammen) aus dem Bereich der Wissensorganisation nachvollziehen wollen. Beschränkte sich Friedman 2011 in seinem Artikel "Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization" [Fn 01] noch ausschließlich auf Sprache als Medium im Zeichenprozess, bezieht er sich nun auf Visualisierungen als Repräsentationsform und scheint somit seinen Ansatz um den Aspekt der Bildlichkeit zu erweitern. Zumindest erwartet man dies nach der Lektüre der Beschreibung des aktuellen Vorhabens von Friedman und Smiraglia, das - wie die Autoren verkünden - auf einer semiotischen Grundlage durchgeführt worden sei.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.libreas.eu/09treude.htm. Bezug zu: Alon Friedman, Richard P. Smiraglia, (2013): Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69/1, S.27-48.
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01
    0.012329352 = product of:
      0.024658704 = sum of:
        0.024658704 = product of:
          0.04931741 = sum of:
            0.04931741 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04931741 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  3. Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015) 0.01
    0.008123662 = product of:
      0.016247325 = sum of:
        0.016247325 = product of:
          0.03249465 = sum of:
            0.03249465 = weight(_text_:p in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03249465 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Much of the literature of information science and knowledge organization has accepted and built upon Elaine Svenonius's (2004) claim that "paradigmatic relationships are those that are context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds" (p. 583). At the same time, the literature demonstrates a common understanding that paradigmatic relations are the kinds of semantic relations used in thesauri and other knowledge organization systems (including equivalence relations, hierarchical relations, and associative relations). This understanding is problematic and harmful because it directs attention away from the empirical and contextual basis for knowledge-organizing systems. Whether A is a kind of X is certainly not context-free and definitional in empirical sciences or in much everyday information. Semantic relations are theory-dependent and, in biology, for example, a scientific revolution has taken place in which many relations have changed following the new taxonomic paradigm named "cladism." This biological example is not an exception, but the norm. Semantic relations including paradigmatic relations are not a priori but are dependent on subject knowledge, scientific findings, and paradigms. As long as information scientists and knowledge organizers isolate themselves from subject knowledge, knowledge organization cannot possibly progress.
  4. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.01
    0.007705845 = product of:
      0.01541169 = sum of:
        0.01541169 = product of:
          0.03082338 = sum of:
            0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03082338 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  5. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.01
    0.007705845 = product of:
      0.01541169 = sum of:
        0.01541169 = product of:
          0.03082338 = sum of:
            0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03082338 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Languages

Types