-
Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05)
0.01
0.007705845 = product of:
0.01541169 = sum of:
0.01541169 = product of:
0.03082338 = sum of:
0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03082338 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2.12.2007 19:39:22
-
Rädler, K.: Kataloganreicherung mit digitalen Inhaltsverzeichnissen eröffnet neue Geschäftsfelder : Erfahrungen aus der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2008)
0.01
0.007705845 = product of:
0.01541169 = sum of:
0.01541169 = product of:
0.03082338 = sum of:
0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03082338 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 17:14:24
-
Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021)
0.01
0.007705845 = product of:
0.01541169 = sum of:
0.01541169 = product of:
0.03082338 = sum of:
0.03082338 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03082338 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 9.2021 12:22:02
-
Tennant, R.: Library catalogs : the wrong solution (2003)
0.01
0.0068931566 = product of:
0.013786313 = sum of:
0.013786313 = product of:
0.027572626 = sum of:
0.027572626 = weight(_text_:p in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027572626 = score(doc=1558,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.16853966 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "MOST INTEGRATED library systems, as they are currently configured and used, should be removed from public view. Before I say why, let me be clean that I think the integrated library system serves a very important, albeit limited, role. An integrated library system should serve as a key piece of the infrastructure of a library, handling such tasks as ma terials acquisition, cataloging (including holdings, of course), and circulation. The integrated library system should be a complete and accurate recording of a local library's holdings. It should not be presented to users as the primary system for locating information. It fails badly at that important job. - Lack of content- The central problem of almost any library catalog system is that it typically includes only information about the books and journals held by a parficular library. Most do not provide access to joumal article indexes, web search engines, or even selective web directories like the Librarians' Index to the Internet. If they do offen such access, it is only via links to these services. The library catalog is far from onestop shopping for information. Although we acknowledge that fact to each other, we still treat it as if it were the best place in the universe to begin a search. Most of us give the catalog a place of great prominente an our web pages. But Information for each book is limited to the author, title, and a few subject headings. Seldom can book reviews, jacket summaries, recommendations, or tables of contents be found-or anything at all to help users determine if they want the material. - Lack of coverage - Most catalogs do not allow patrons to discover even all the books that are available to them. If you're lucky, your catalog may cover the collections of those libraries with which you have close ties-such as a regional network. But that leaves out all those items that could be requested via interlibrary loan. As Steve Coffman pointed out in his "Building Earth's Largest Library" article, we must show our users the universe that is open to them, highlight the items most accessible, and provide an estimate of how long it would take to obtain other items. - Inability to increase coverage - Despite some well-meaning attempts to smash everything of interest into the library catalog, the fact remains that most integrated library systems expect MARC records and MARC records only. This means that whatever we want to put into the catalog must be described using MARC and AACR2 (see "Marc Must Die," LJ 10/15/02, p. 26ff.). This is a barrier to dramatically increasing the scope of a catalog system, even if we decided to do it. How would you, for example, use the Open Archives Initiative Harvesting Protocol to crawl the bibliographic records of remote repositories and make them searchable within your library catalog? It can't be dope, and it shouldn't. The library catalog should be a record of a given library's holdings. Period.
- User Interface hostility - Recently I used the Library catalogs of two public libraries, new products from two major library vendors. A link an one catalog said "Knowledge Portal," whatever that was supposed to mean. Clicking an it brought you to two choices: Z39.50 Bibliographic Sites and the World Wide Web. No public library user will have the faintest clue what Z39.50 is. The other catalog launched a Java applet that before long froze my web browser so badly I was forced to shut the program down. Pick a popular book and pretend you are a library patron. Choose three to five libraries at random from the lib web-cats site (pick catalogs that are not using your system) and attempt to find your book. Try as much as possible to see the system through the eyes of your patrons-a teenager, a retiree, or an older faculty member. You may not always like what you see. Now go back to your own system and try the same thing. - What should the public see? - Our users deserve an information system that helps them find all different kinds of resources-books, articles, web pages, working papers in institutional repositories-and gives them the tools to focus in an what they want. This is not, and should not be, the library catalog. It must communicate with the catalog, but it will also need to interface with other information systems, such as vendor databases and web search engines. What will such a tool look like? We are seeing the beginnings of such a tool in the current offerings of cross-database search tools from a few vendors (see "Cross-Database Search," LJ 10/15/01, p. 29ff). We are in the early stages of developing the kind of robust, userfriendly tool that will be required before we can pull our catalogs from public view. Meanwhile, we can begin by making what we have easier to understand and use."
-
Kostädt, P.: Innovative Recherchemöglichkeiten in Katalogen und Bibliotheksportalen (2008)
0.01
0.00649893 = product of:
0.01299786 = sum of:
0.01299786 = product of:
0.02599572 = sum of:
0.02599572 = weight(_text_:p in 2295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02599572 = score(doc=2295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 2295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Subject access : preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future" (2011)
0.01
0.00649893 = product of:
0.01299786 = sum of:
0.01299786 = product of:
0.02599572 = sum of:
0.02599572 = weight(_text_:p in 1799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02599572 = score(doc=1799,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 1799, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1799)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Landry, P. et al.
-
Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001)
0.01
0.006164676 = product of:
0.012329352 = sum of:
0.012329352 = product of:
0.024658704 = sum of:
0.024658704 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024658704 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991)
0.01
0.006164676 = product of:
0.012329352 = sum of:
0.012329352 = product of:
0.024658704 = sum of:
0.024658704 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024658704 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 17:22:25
-
Ikas, W.-V.; Litten, F.: World Wide Web und Catalogue Enrichment : Möglichkeiten des verbesserten Nachweises von mikroverfilmten Handschriften und Inkunabeln (2007)
0.01
0.006164676 = product of:
0.012329352 = sum of:
0.012329352 = product of:
0.024658704 = sum of:
0.024658704 = weight(_text_:22 in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024658704 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2007 11:19:21
-
Greifeneder, E.: Hilfe auf allen Ebenen : ein Beitrag zur Forschung über Online-Hilfen in OPACs (2008)
0.01
0.006164676 = product of:
0.012329352 = sum of:
0.012329352 = product of:
0.024658704 = sum of:
0.024658704 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024658704 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 13:29:15
-
Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009)
0.01
0.006164676 = product of:
0.012329352 = sum of:
0.012329352 = product of:
0.024658704 = sum of:
0.024658704 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024658704 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:40:38
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.01
0.0056865634 = product of:
0.011373127 = sum of:
0.011373127 = product of:
0.022746254 = sum of:
0.022746254 = weight(_text_:p in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022746254 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
-
Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000)
0.01
0.0053940914 = product of:
0.010788183 = sum of:
0.010788183 = product of:
0.021576365 = sum of:
0.021576365 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021576365 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004)
0.01
0.0053940914 = product of:
0.010788183 = sum of:
0.010788183 = product of:
0.021576365 = sum of:
0.021576365 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021576365 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
-
Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005)
0.01
0.0053940914 = product of:
0.010788183 = sum of:
0.010788183 = product of:
0.021576365 = sum of:
0.021576365 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021576365 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37
-
Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010)
0.00
0.0046235067 = product of:
0.009247013 = sum of:
0.009247013 = product of:
0.018494027 = sum of:
0.018494027 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018494027 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
