Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.05
    0.053772107 = product of:
      0.10754421 = sum of:
        0.10754421 = sum of:
          0.058308005 = weight(_text_:w in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058308005 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.049236204 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049236204 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  2. Mettrop, W.; Nieuwenhuysen, P.: Internet search engines : fluctuations in document accessibility (2001) 0.01
    0.009110626 = product of:
      0.018221252 = sum of:
        0.018221252 = product of:
          0.036442503 = sum of:
            0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 4481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036442503 = score(doc=4481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 4481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4481)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Radev, D.R.; Libner, K.; Fan, W.: Getting answers to natural language questions on the Web (2002) 0.01
    0.009110626 = product of:
      0.018221252 = sum of:
        0.018221252 = product of:
          0.036442503 = sum of:
            0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036442503 = score(doc=5204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)