Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.09
    0.09018719 = product of:
      0.18037438 = sum of:
        0.18037438 = sum of:
          0.08144922 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08144922 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.098925166 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098925166 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.03
    0.033820197 = product of:
      0.067640394 = sum of:
        0.067640394 = sum of:
          0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030543458 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037096936 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  3. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.03
    0.033820197 = product of:
      0.067640394 = sum of:
        0.067640394 = sum of:
          0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030543458 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037096936 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02
    0.024731291 = product of:
      0.049462583 = sum of:
        0.049462583 = product of:
          0.098925166 = sum of:
            0.098925166 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098925166 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.021859579 = product of:
      0.043719158 = sum of:
        0.043719158 = product of:
          0.087438315 = sum of:
            0.087438315 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087438315 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  6. Gorraiz, J.: ¬Die unerträgliche Bedeutung der Zitate (1992) 0.02
    0.020362305 = product of:
      0.04072461 = sum of:
        0.04072461 = product of:
          0.08144922 = sum of:
            0.08144922 = weight(_text_:j in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08144922 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.02
    0.017634273 = product of:
      0.035268545 = sum of:
        0.035268545 = product of:
          0.07053709 = sum of:
            0.07053709 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07053709 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
  8. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02
    0.015457057 = product of:
      0.030914115 = sum of:
        0.030914115 = product of:
          0.06182823 = sum of:
            0.06182823 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06182823 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  9. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.013115749 = product of:
      0.026231498 = sum of:
        0.026231498 = product of:
          0.052462995 = sum of:
            0.052462995 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052462995 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  10. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.01
    0.01272644 = product of:
      0.02545288 = sum of:
        0.02545288 = product of:
          0.05090576 = sum of:
            0.05090576 = weight(_text_:j in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05090576 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.13, S.1259-1261 (J. Andersen)
  11. Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999) 0.01
    0.01272644 = product of:
      0.02545288 = sum of:
        0.02545288 = product of:
          0.05090576 = sum of:
            0.05090576 = weight(_text_:j in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05090576 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
  12. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.012365646 = product of:
      0.024731291 = sum of:
        0.024731291 = product of:
          0.049462583 = sum of:
            0.049462583 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049462583 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  13. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.01
    0.01102142 = product of:
      0.02204284 = sum of:
        0.02204284 = product of:
          0.04408568 = sum of:
            0.04408568 = weight(_text_:j in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04408568 = score(doc=5220,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.304033 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
  14. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  15. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  16. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.01081994 = product of:
      0.02163988 = sum of:
        0.02163988 = product of:
          0.04327976 = sum of:
            0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04327976 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  17. Howard, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicitng a document's pertinence from its citation (1991) 0.01
    0.010181152 = product of:
      0.020362305 = sum of:
        0.020362305 = product of:
          0.04072461 = sum of:
            0.04072461 = weight(_text_:j in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04072461 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ASIS '91: systems understanding people. proc. of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ASIS, vol.28, Washington, DC, 27.-31.10.1991. Ed.: J.-M. Griffiths
  18. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01
    0.009274234 = product of:
      0.018548468 = sum of:
        0.018548468 = product of:
          0.037096936 = sum of:
            0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037096936 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  19. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01
    0.009274234 = product of:
      0.018548468 = sum of:
        0.018548468 = product of:
          0.037096936 = sum of:
            0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037096936 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  20. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01
    0.009274234 = product of:
      0.018548468 = sum of:
        0.018548468 = product of:
          0.037096936 = sum of:
            0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037096936 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 11

Types

  • a 45
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Classifications