Search (294 results, page 15 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 1: mental models of descriptions (2010) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 4145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=4145,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4145, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 2: comparison task and conclusions (2010) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 4146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=4146,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4146, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4146)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: User verification of the FRBR conceptual model (2012) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=395,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Greenberg, J.; Mayer-Patel, K.; Trujillo, S.: YouTube: applying FRBR and exploring the multiple description coding compression model (2012) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Jett, J.; Sacchi, S.; Lee, J.H.; Clarke, R.I.: ¬A conceptual model for video games and interactive media (2016) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 2767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=2767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Pooja, K.M.; Mondal, S.; Chandra, J.: ¬A graph combination with edge pruning-based approach for author name disambiguation (2020) 0.01
    0.00636322 = product of:
      0.01272644 = sum of:
        0.01272644 = product of:
          0.02545288 = sum of:
            0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02545288 = score(doc=59,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000) 0.01
    0.00540997 = product of:
      0.01081994 = sum of:
        0.01081994 = product of:
          0.02163988 = sum of:
            0.02163988 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02163988 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
  9. Viswanathan, C.G.: Cataloguing:theory & practice (2007) 0.01
    0.00540997 = product of:
      0.01081994 = sum of:
        0.01081994 = product of:
          0.02163988 = sum of:
            0.02163988 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02163988 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Library Catalogue : Its Nature, Factions, and Importance in a Library System 2. History of Modern Library Catalogues 3. Catalogue Codes: Origin, Growth and Development 4. Principles of Planning and Provision of the Library Catalogue 5.Catalogue Entries and their Functions in Achieving the Objectives of the Library Catalogue 6.Descriptive Cataloguing 7. Physical Forms of the Catalogue-I Manual Catalogues 8. Physical Forms of the Catalogues-II Computerised Cataloges 9. Varieties of Catalogues, their Scope and Functions 10. Subject Cataloguing 11. Cataloguing Department: Organization and Administration. 12. Cost Analysis of Cataloguing Procedures and Suggested Economies 13. Co-operation and Centralization in Cataloguing 14. Union Catalogues and Subject Specialisation 15. Cataloguing of Special Material 16. Arrangement, Filing, Guiding of catalogue and Instructions for its Use 17. Education and Training of Cataloguers 18.Documentation : An Extension of Cataloguing and Classification Applied to Isolates 19.Catalogue Cards, Their Style and Reproduction Methods 20. Work of Personal Authors 21. Choice and Entry of Personal Names 22. Works of Corporate Authors 23. Legal Publications 24. Choice of Headings for Corporate Bodies 25. Works of Unknown Authorship : Entry under Uniform Titles 26. Acces Points to Books and Meta- Books by A-ACR2 27. AACR2 1988 revision : Choice of Access Points to Name Headings and Uniform Titles 28. Added Entries Other Than Subject Entries 29. Subject Entries 30. Analytiacal Entries 31. Series Note and Series Entry 32. Contents, Notes and Annotation 33. References 34. Display of Entries Appendix-I Select Aids and Guides for the Cataloguer Appendix-II Definitions of Terms Commonly used in Cataloguing Appendix-III Cataloguing Examination: Select Questions Appendix-IV Implications of the adoption of A-ACR2
  10. Read, J.: Cataloguing without tears : managing knowledge in the information society (2003) 0.01
    0.005090576 = product of:
      0.010181152 = sum of:
        0.010181152 = product of:
          0.020362305 = sum of:
            0.020362305 = weight(_text_:j in 4509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020362305 = score(doc=4509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 4509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Riva, P.; Oliver, C.: Evaluation of RDA as an implementation of FRBR and FRAD (2012) 0.01
    0.005090576 = product of:
      0.010181152 = sum of:
        0.010181152 = product of:
          0.020362305 = sum of:
            0.020362305 = weight(_text_:j in 1918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020362305 = score(doc=1918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 1918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDA, Resource Description and Access, is based on the foundation of the original entity-relationship statements of the conceptual models FRBR and FRAD. RDA not only uses the vocabulary of entities, attributes and relationships, as well as the user tasks, described in the models, these concepts also form an integral feature of its structure at both the macro level (the organisation of the sections and chapters of RDA reflects the models) and at a more detailed level within chapters. This paper reviews the degree of alignment of RDA with FRBR and FRAD, covering the areas of user tasks, entities, attributes, and relationships, and discusses the divergences of greater or lesser significance which exist. The FRBR user tasks are almost identical to the corresponding RDA tasks, but in RDA the wording and naming of tasks corresponding to the FRAD user tasks is reoriented towards the point of view of the end user. RDA adopts the bibliographic entities, but does not treat the FRAD entities name, identifier, or controlled access point as entities in their own right, even though the essence of the FRAD model of authority control is integrated into RDA. RDA's data elements can generally be traced back to attributes defined in either FRBR or FRAD, although at times at a greater level of granularity. The FRBR primary relationships are all included in RDA, but a direct link between work and manifestation is also defined in RDA with the work manifested relationship. RDA takes steps towards the harmonisation of the separate models, some obvious, such as adding the entity family to group 2 and using the FRAD definition of the entities person and corporate body, others less so, for instance in harmonising the different treatment of relationships among group 1 entities in the organisation of the relationship designators in appendix J. The ways in which RDA implements both FRBR and FRAD into a single content standard, as well as the ways in which RDA diverges from the models, may provide valuable insights for the consolidation of the FRBR family of conceptual models.
  12. ¬The library's guide to graphic novels (2020) 0.00
    0.004454254 = product of:
      0.008908508 = sum of:
        0.008908508 = product of:
          0.017817017 = sum of:
            0.017817017 = weight(_text_:j in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017817017 = score(doc=717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.12287348 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Ballestro, J.
  13. Boeuf, P. le: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) : hype or cure-all (2005) 0.00
    0.002545288 = product of:
      0.005090576 = sum of:
        0.005090576 = product of:
          0.010181152 = sum of:
            0.010181152 = weight(_text_:j in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010181152 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.070213415 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Zumer, M.: Dedication [to Zlata Dimec]; P. Le Boeuf: FRBR: Hype or Cure-All? Introduction; O.M.A. Madison: The origins of the IFLA study an functional requirements for bibliographic records; G.E. Patton: Extending FRBR to authorities; T. Delsey: Modeling subject access: extending the FRBR and FRANAR conceptual models; S. Gradmann: rdfs:frbr - Towards an implementation model for library catalogs using semantic web technology; G. Johsson: Cataloguing of hand press materials and the concept of expression in FRBR; K. Kilner: The AustLit Gateway and scholarly bibliography: a specialist implementation of the FRBR; P. Le Boeuf: Musical works in the FRBR model or "Quasi la Stessa Cosa": variations an a theme by Umberto Eco; K. Albertsen, C. van Nuys: Paradigma: FRBR and digital documents; D. Miller, P Le Boeuf: "Such stuff as dreams are made on": How does FRBR fit performing arts?; Y. Nicolas: Folklore requirements for bibliographic records: oral traditions and FRBR; B.B. Tillett: FRBR and cataloging for the future; Z. Dimec, M. Zumer, G.J.A. Riesthuis: Slovenian cataloguing practice and Functional Requirements for Bibliography Records: a comparative analysis; M. Zumer: Implementation of FRBR: European research initiative; T.B. Hicley, E.T. O'Neill: FRBRizing OCLC's WorldCat; R. Sturman: Implementing the FRBR conceptual approach in the ISIS software environment: IFPA (ISIS FRBR prototype application); J. Radebaugh, C. Keith: FRBR display tool; D.R. Miller: XOBIS - an experimental schema for unifying bibliographic and authority records
  14. Intner, S.S.; Lazinger, S.S.; Weihs, J.: Metadata and its impact on libraries (2005) 0.00
    0.002545288 = product of:
      0.005090576 = sum of:
        0.005090576 = product of:
          0.010181152 = sum of:
            0.010181152 = weight(_text_:j in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010181152 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045634337 = queryNorm
                0.070213415 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Types

  • a 272
  • m 18
  • b 15
  • el 7
  • s 7
  • More… Less…