Search (235 results, page 2 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.02158475 = product of:
      0.0431695 = sum of:
        0.0431695 = product of:
          0.086339 = sum of:
            0.086339 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086339 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  2. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.02158475 = product of:
      0.0431695 = sum of:
        0.0431695 = product of:
          0.086339 = sum of:
            0.086339 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086339 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  3. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.02158475 = product of:
      0.0431695 = sum of:
        0.0431695 = product of:
          0.086339 = sum of:
            0.086339 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086339 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  4. Informetrics '91 : selected papers from the 3rd International Conference on Bibliometrics, 9-12 Aug. 1991, Bangalore (1993) 0.02
    0.018938396 = product of:
      0.037876792 = sum of:
        0.037876792 = product of:
          0.075753585 = sum of:
            0.075753585 = weight(_text_:b in 5063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075753585 = score(doc=5063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 5063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of librarianship and information science 25(1993) no.4, S.216 (B. Cronin)
  5. Larsen, B.: Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers (2002) 0.02
    0.018938396 = product of:
      0.037876792 = sum of:
        0.037876792 = product of:
          0.075753585 = sum of:
            0.075753585 = weight(_text_:b in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075753585 = score(doc=4175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Does informetrics need a theory? : a rejoinder to professor anthony van raan (2017) 0.02
    0.018938396 = product of:
      0.037876792 = sum of:
        0.037876792 = product of:
          0.075753585 = sum of:
            0.075753585 = weight(_text_:b in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075753585 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02
    0.018501213 = product of:
      0.037002426 = sum of:
        0.037002426 = product of:
          0.07400485 = sum of:
            0.07400485 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07400485 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  8. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.018501213 = product of:
      0.037002426 = sum of:
        0.037002426 = product of:
          0.07400485 = sum of:
            0.07400485 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07400485 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  9. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.02
    0.015781997 = product of:
      0.031563994 = sum of:
        0.031563994 = product of:
          0.06312799 = sum of:
            0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06312799 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
  10. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.02
    0.015781997 = product of:
      0.031563994 = sum of:
        0.031563994 = product of:
          0.06312799 = sum of:
            0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06312799 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    b
  11. Cronin, B.: On the epistemic significance of place (2008) 0.02
    0.015781997 = product of:
      0.031563994 = sum of:
        0.031563994 = product of:
          0.06312799 = sum of:
            0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 4853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06312799 = score(doc=4853,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 4853, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4853)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000) 0.02
    0.015781997 = product of:
      0.031563994 = sum of:
        0.031563994 = product of:
          0.06312799 = sum of:
            0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06312799 = score(doc=4542,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015) 0.02
    0.015781997 = product of:
      0.031563994 = sum of:
        0.031563994 = product of:
          0.06312799 = sum of:
            0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06312799 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Dederke, J.; Hirschmann, B.; Johann, D.: ¬Der Data Citation Index von Clarivate : Eine wertvolle Ressource für die Forschung und für Bibliotheken? (2022) 0.02
    0.015781997 = product of:
      0.031563994 = sum of:
        0.031563994 = product of:
          0.06312799 = sum of:
            0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06312799 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Macaluso, B.; Milojevi´c, S.; Cronin, B.; Thelwall, M.: arXiv E-prints and the journal of record : an analysis of roles and relationships (2014) 0.01
    0.013667612 = product of:
      0.027335225 = sum of:
        0.027335225 = product of:
          0.05467045 = sum of:
            0.05467045 = weight(_text_:b in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05467045 = score(doc=1285,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since its creation in 1991, arXiv has become central to the diffusion of research in a number of fields. Combining data from the entirety of arXiv and the Web of Science (WoS), this article investigates (a) the proportion of papers across all disciplines that are on arXiv and the proportion of arXiv papers that are in the WoS, (b) the elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication, and (c) the aging characteristics and scientific impact of arXiv e-prints and their published version. It shows that the proportion of WoS papers found on arXiv varies across the specialties of physics and mathematics, and that only a few specialties make extensive use of the repository. Elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication has shortened but remains longer in mathematics than in physics. In physics, mathematics, as well as in astronomy and astrophysics, arXiv versions are cited more promptly and decay faster than WoS papers. The arXiv versions of papers-both published and unpublished-have lower citation rates than published papers, although there is almost no difference in the impact of the arXiv versions of published and unpublished papers.
  16. Sugimoto, C.R.; Pratt , J.A.; Hauser, K.: Using field cocitation analysis to assess reciprocal and shared impact of LIS/MIS fields (2008) 0.01
    0.013391469 = product of:
      0.026782937 = sum of:
        0.026782937 = product of:
          0.053565875 = sum of:
            0.053565875 = weight(_text_:b in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053565875 = score(doc=1959,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study utilized bibliometric tools to analyze the relationship between two separate, but related, fields: Library and Information Science (LIS) and Management Information Systems (MIS). The top-ranked 48 journals in each field were used as the unit of analysis. Using these journals, field cocitation was introduced as a method for evaluating the relationships between the two fields. The three-phased study evaluated (a) the knowledge imported/exported between LIS and MIS, (b) the body of knowledge influenced by both fields, and (c) the overlap in fields as demonstrated by multidimensional scaling. Data collection and analysis were performed using DIALOG and SPSS programs. The primary findings from this study indicate that (a) the MIS impact on LIS is greater than the reverse, (b) there is a growing trend for shared impact between the two disciplines, and (c) the area of overlap between the two fields is predominately those journals focusing on technology systems and digital information. Additionally, this study validated field cocitation as a method by which to evaluate relationships between fields.
  17. Aris, A.; Shneiderman, B.; Qazvinian, V.; Radev, D.: Visual overviews for discovering key papers and influences across research fronts (2009) 0.01
    0.013391469 = product of:
      0.026782937 = sum of:
        0.026782937 = product of:
          0.053565875 = sum of:
            0.053565875 = weight(_text_:b in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053565875 = score(doc=3156,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gaining a rapid overview of an emerging scientific topic, sometimes called research fronts, is an increasingly common task due to the growing amount of interdisciplinary collaboration. Visual overviews that show temporal patterns of paper publication and citation links among papers can help researchers and analysts to see the rate of growth of topics, identify key papers, and understand influences across subdisciplines. This article applies a novel network-visualization tool based on meaningful layouts of nodes to present research fronts and show citation links that indicate influences across research fronts. To demonstrate the value of two-dimensional layouts with multiple regions and user control of link visibility, we conducted a design-oriented, preliminary case study with 6 domain experts over a 4-month period. The main benefits were being able (a) to easily identify key papers and see the increasing number of papers within a research front, and (b) to quickly see the strength and direction of influence across related research fronts.
  18. Milard, B.; Tanguy, L.: Citations in scientific texts : do social relations matter? (2018) 0.01
    0.013391469 = product of:
      0.026782937 = sum of:
        0.026782937 = product of:
          0.053565875 = sum of:
            0.053565875 = weight(_text_:b in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053565875 = score(doc=4547,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an investigation of the role of social relations in the writing of scientific articles through the study of in-text citations. Does the fact that the author of an article knows the author whose work he or she cites have an impact on the context of the citation? Because citations are commonly used as criteria for research evaluation, it is important to question their social background to better understand how it impacts textual features. We studied a collection of science articles (N?=?123) from 5 disciplines and interviewed their authors (N?=?84) to: (a) identify the social relations between citing and cited authors; and (b) measure the correlation between a set of features related to in-text citations (N?=?6,956) and the identified social relations. Our pioneering work, mixing sociological and linguistic results, shows that social relations between authors can partly explain the variations of citations in terms of frequency, position and textual context.
  19. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01
    0.013082335 = product of:
      0.02616467 = sum of:
        0.02616467 = product of:
          0.05232934 = sum of:
            0.05232934 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05232934 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  20. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.013082335 = product of:
      0.02616467 = sum of:
        0.02616467 = product of:
          0.05232934 = sum of:
            0.05232934 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05232934 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35

Years

Languages

  • e 215
  • d 18
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 225
  • m 7
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…