Search (333 results, page 1 of 17)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Solla Price, D. de: Little science, big science (1963) 0.10 
    0.10216852 = product of:
  0.15325278 = sum of:
    0.061517112 = weight(_text_:m in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061517112 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.54987466 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
    0.09173566 = product of:
      0.18347132 = sum of:
        0.18347132 = weight(_text_:de in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18347132 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.94961995 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Type
    m
  2. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.07 
    0.06516872 = product of:
  0.19550617 = sum of:
    0.19550617 = sum of:
      0.14677705 = weight(_text_:de in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14677705 = score(doc=1144,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.75969595 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.04872912 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04872912 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Imprint
    León : Universidad de León, Secretariado de Publicaciones
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  3. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.06 
    0.05713331 = product of:
  0.08569996 = sum of:
    0.043061975 = weight(_text_:m in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043061975 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
    0.04263798 = product of:
      0.08527596 = sum of:
        0.08527596 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08527596 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
    Type
    m
  4. Solla Price, D. de: Little science, big science : Von der Studierstube zur Großforschung (1974) 0.04 
    0.040867403 = product of:
  0.061301105 = sum of:
    0.024606844 = weight(_text_:m in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024606844 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
    0.036694262 = product of:
      0.073388524 = sum of:
        0.073388524 = weight(_text_:de in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073388524 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Type
    m
  5. Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 0.04 
    0.040867403 = product of:
  0.061301105 = sum of:
    0.024606844 = weight(_text_:m in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024606844 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
    0.036694262 = product of:
      0.073388524 = sum of:
        0.073388524 = weight(_text_:de in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073388524 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Using a very small sample of 8 data sets it was recently shown by De Visscher (2011) that the g-index is very close to the square root of the total number of citations. It was argued that there is no bibliometrically meaningful difference. Using another somewhat larger empirical sample of 26 data sets I show that the difference may be larger and I argue in favor of the g-index.
  6. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.04 
    0.040705882 = product of:
  0.122117646 = sum of:
    0.122117646 = sum of:
      0.073388524 = weight(_text_:de in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.073388524 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
      0.04872912 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04872912 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  7. Contreras, E.J.; Moneda, M. De La; Osma, E. Ruiz de; Bailón-Moreno, R.; Ruiz-Baños, R.: ¬A bibliometric model for journal discarding policy at academic libraries (2006) 0.04 
    0.038250186 = product of:
  0.057375275 = sum of:
    0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018455133 = score(doc=4920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
    0.03892014 = product of:
      0.07784028 = sum of:
        0.07784028 = weight(_text_:de in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07784028 = score(doc=4920,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  8. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.03 
    0.032785222 = product of:
  0.049177833 = sum of:
    0.017399667 = weight(_text_:m in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017399667 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.15552804 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
    0.031778164 = product of:
      0.06355633 = sum of:
        0.06355633 = weight(_text_:de in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06355633 = score(doc=3585,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.328958 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
    Type
    m
  9. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.03 
    0.032647606 = product of:
  0.048971407 = sum of:
    0.024606844 = weight(_text_:m in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024606844 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
    0.02436456 = product of:
      0.04872912 = sum of:
        0.04872912 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04872912 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Type
    m
  10. Freitas, J.L.; Gabriel Jr., R.F.; Bufrem, L.S.: Theoretical approximations between Brazilian and Spanish authors' production in the field of knowledge organization in the production of journals on information science in Brazil (2012) 0.03 
    0.03258436 = product of:
  0.097753085 = sum of:
    0.097753085 = sum of:
      0.073388524 = weight(_text_:de in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.073388524 = score(doc=144,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.02436456 = weight(_text_:22 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02436456 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044957645 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This work identifies and analyzes literature about knowledge organization (KO), expressed in scientific journals' communication of information science (IS). It performs an exploratory study on the Base de Dados Referencial de Artigos de Periódicos em Ciência da Informação (BRAPCI, Reference Database of Journal Articles on Information Science) between the years 2000 and 2010. The descriptors relating to "knowledge organization" are used in order to recover and analyze the corresponding articles and to identify descriptors and concepts which integrate the semantic universe related to KO. Through the analysis of content, based on metrical studies, this article gathers and interprets data relating to documents and authors. Through this, it demonstrates the development of this field and its research fronts according to the observed characteristics, as well as noting the transformation indicative in the production of knowledge. The work describes the influences of the Spanish researchers on Brazilian literature in the fields of knowledge and information organization. As a result, it presents the most cited and productive authors, the theoretical currents which support them, and the most significant relationships of the Spanish-Brazilian authors network. Based on the constant key-words analysis in the cited articles, the co-existence of the French conception current and the incipient Spanish influence in Brazil is observed. Through this, it contributes to the comprehension of the thematic range relating to KO, stimulating both criticism and self-criticism, debate and knowledge creation, based on studies that have been developed and institutionalized in academic contexts in Spain and Brazil.
    Content
    Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_g.pdf.
  11. Weeber, M.; Klein, H.; Jong-van den Berg, L.T.W. de; Vos, R.: Using concepts in literature-based discovery : simulating Swanson's Raynaud-Fish Oil and Migraine-Manesium discoveries (2001) 0.03 
    0.030650554 = product of:
  0.04597583 = sum of:
    0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 5910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018455133 = score(doc=5910,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 5910, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5910)
    0.027520698 = product of:
      0.055041395 = sum of:
        0.055041395 = weight(_text_:de in 5910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055041395 = score(doc=5910,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 5910, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5910)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  12. Hernandez-Garcia, Y.I.; Chamizo, J.A.; Kleiche-Dray, M.; Russell, J.M.: ¬The scientific impact of mexican steroid research 1935-1965 : a bibliometric and historiographic analysis (2016) 0.03 
    0.030650554 = product of:
  0.04597583 = sum of:
    0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 2901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018455133 = score(doc=2901,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2901, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2901)
    0.027520698 = product of:
      0.055041395 = sum of:
        0.055041395 = weight(_text_:de in 2901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055041395 = score(doc=2901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 2901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    We studied steroid research from 1935 to 1965 that led to the discovery of the contraceptive pill and cortisone. Bibliometric and patent file searches indicate that the Syntex industrial laboratory located in Mexico and the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) produced about 54% of the relevant papers published in mainstream journals, which in turn generated over 80% of the citations and in the case of Syntex, all industrial patents in the field between 1950 and 1965. This course of events, which was unprecedented at that time in a developing country, was interrupted when Syntex moved its research division to the US, leaving Mexico with a small but productive research group in the chemistry of natural products.
  13. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.03 
    0.029581947 = product of:
  0.04437292 = sum of:
    0.0260995 = weight(_text_:m in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0260995 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
    0.01827342 = product of:
      0.03654684 = sum of:
        0.03654684 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03654684 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
  14. Dobrota, M.; Dobrota, M.: ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity : what if the award factor was Excluded? (2016) 0.03 
    0.029581947 = product of:
  0.04437292 = sum of:
    0.0260995 = weight(_text_:m in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0260995 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
    0.01827342 = product of:
      0.03654684 = sum of:
        0.03654684 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03654684 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:40:53
  15. Nicholas, D.; Ritchie, M.: Literature and bibliometrics (1978) 0.03 
    0.028999446 = product of:
  0.086998336 = sum of:
    0.086998336 = weight(_text_:m in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.086998336 = score(doc=1081,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.7776402 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    m
  16. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.03 
    0.028566655 = product of:
  0.04284998 = sum of:
    0.021530988 = weight(_text_:m in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021530988 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.02131899 = product of:
      0.04263798 = sum of:
        0.04263798 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04263798 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  17. Zitt, M.; Lelu, A.; Bassecoulard, E.: Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping : Portolan charts of research fields? (2011) 0.03 
    0.027910363 = product of:
  0.041865543 = sum of:
    0.02663769 = weight(_text_:m in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02663769 = score(doc=4130,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
    0.015227851 = product of:
      0.030455703 = sum of:
        0.030455703 = weight(_text_:22 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030455703 = score(doc=4130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The mapping of scientific fields, based on principles established in the seventies, has recently shown a remarkable development and applications are now booming with progress in computing efficiency. We examine here the convergence of two thematic mapping approaches, citation-based and word-based, which rely on quite different sociological backgrounds. A corpus in the nanoscience field was broken down into research themes, using the same clustering technique on the 2 networks separately. The tool for comparison is the table of intersections of the M clusters (here M=50) built on either side. A classical visual exploitation of such contingency tables is based on correspondence analysis. We investigate a rearrangement of the intersection table (block modeling), resulting in pseudo-map. The interest of this representation for confronting the two breakdowns is discussed. The amount of convergence found is, in our view, a strong argument in favor of the reliability of bibliometric mapping. However, the outcomes are not convergent at the degree where they can be substituted for each other. Differences highlight the complementarity between approaches based on different networks. In contrast with the strong informetric posture found in recent literature, where lexical and citation markers are considered as miscible tokens, the framework proposed here does not mix the two elements at an early stage, in compliance with their contrasted logic.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 18:22:50
  18. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.03 
    0.027910363 = product of:
  0.041865543 = sum of:
    0.02663769 = weight(_text_:m in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02663769 = score(doc=995,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
    0.015227851 = product of:
      0.030455703 = sum of:
        0.030455703 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030455703 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50
  19. Abad-García, M.-F.; González-Teruel, A.; González-Llinares, J.: Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at finding spanish articles in repositories (2018) 0.03 
    0.02554213 = product of:
  0.038313195 = sum of:
    0.015379278 = weight(_text_:m in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015379278 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
    0.022933915 = product of:
      0.04586783 = sum of:
        0.04586783 = weight(_text_:de in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04586783 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper explores the usefulness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar (GS) for evaluating open access (OA) policies that demand a deposit in a repository. A case study was designed focusing on 762 financed articles with a project of FIS-2012 of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Spanish national health service's main management body for health research. Its finance is therefore subject to the Spanish Government OA mandate. A search was carried out for full-text OA copies of the 762 articles using the four tools being evaluated and with identification of the repository housing these items. Of the 762 articles concerned, 510 OA copies were found of 353 unique articles (46.3%) in 68 repositories. OA copies were found of 81.9% of the articles in PubMed Central and copies of 49.5% of the articles in an institutional repository (IR). BASE and GS identified 93.5% of the articles and OpenAIRE 86.7%. Recolecta identified just 62.2% of the articles deposited in a Spanish IR. BASE achieved the greatest success, by locating copies deposited in IR, while GS found those deposited in disciplinary repositories. None of the tools identified copies of all the articles, so they need to be used in a complementary way when evaluating OA policies.
  20. Gingras, Y.: Bibliometrics and research evaluation : uses and abuses (2016) 0.03 
    0.025500124 = product of:
  0.038250186 = sum of:
    0.012303422 = weight(_text_:m in 3805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012303422 = score(doc=3805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 3805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3805)
    0.025946762 = product of:
      0.051893525 = sum of:
        0.051893525 = weight(_text_:de in 3805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051893525 = score(doc=3805,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.26859307 = fieldWeight in 3805, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3805)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 68(2017) no.9, S.2290-2292 (Judit Bar-Ilan). Originaltitel: Dérives de l'évaluation de la recherche.
    Type
    m

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 312
  • m 20
  • el 6
  • s 3
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications