Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × author_ss:"Panzer, M."
  1. Panzer, M.: Relationships, spaces, and the two faces of Dewey (2008) 0.02
    0.015325277 = product of:
      0.022987915 = sum of:
        0.009227566 = weight(_text_:m in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227566 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.0824812 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
        0.013760349 = product of:
          0.027520698 = sum of:
            0.027520698 = weight(_text_:de in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027520698 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.14244299 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    What are those "other" relationships that Dewey possesses and that seem so important to surface? Firstly, there is the relationship of concepts to resources. Dewey has been used for a long time, and over 200,000 numbers are assigned to information resources each year and added to WorldCat by the Library of Congress and the German National Library alone. Secondly, we have relationships between concepts in the scheme itself. Dewey provides a rich set of non-hierarchical relations, indicating other relevant and related subjects across disciplinary boundaries. Thirdly, perhaps most importantly, there is the relationship between the same concepts across different languages. Dewey has been translated extensively, and current versions are available in French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Briefer representations of the top-three levels (the DDC Summaries) are available in several languages in the DeweyBrowser. This multilingual nature of the scheme allows searchers to access a broader range of resources or to switch the language of--and thus localize--subject metadata seamlessly. MelvilClass, a Dewey front-end developed by the German National Library for the German translation, could be used as a common interface to the DDC in any language, as it is built upon the standard DDC data format. It is not hard to give an example of the basic terminology of a class pulled together in a multilingual way: <class/794.8> a skos:Concept ; skos:notation "794.8"^^ddc:notation ; skos:prefLabel "Computer games"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Computerspiele"@de ; skos:prefLabel "Jeux sur ordinateur"@fr ; skos:prefLabel "Juegos por computador"@es .
  2. Panzer, M.: Taxonomies as resources identification, location and access of a »Webified« Dewey (2008) 0.01
    0.007176996 = product of:
      0.021530988 = sum of:
        0.021530988 = weight(_text_:m in 5471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021530988 = score(doc=5471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5471)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Baker, T.; Bermès, E.; Coyle, K.; Dunsire, G.; Isaac, A.; Murray, P.; Panzer, M.; Schneider, J.; Singer, R.; Summers, E.; Waites, W.; Young, J.; Zeng, M.: Library Linked Data Incubator Group Final Report (2011) 0.01
    0.005799889 = product of:
      0.017399667 = sum of:
        0.017399667 = weight(_text_:m in 4796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017399667 = score(doc=4796,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.15552804 = fieldWeight in 4796, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4796)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)