Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.020433702 = product of:
  0.030650552 = sum of:
    0.012303422 = weight(_text_:m in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012303422 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
    0.018347131 = product of:
      0.036694262 = sum of:
        0.036694262 = weight(_text_:de in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036694262 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.18992399 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.ibi.hu-berlin.de/de/archiv/forschung/prom_habil/dissertationen/Tavakolizadeh-Ravari2007. Vgl. auch: http://mravari.blogfa.com/post-20.aspxgl.

0.014356956 = product of:
  0.043070868 = sum of:
    0.043070868 = product of:
      0.086141735 = sum of:
        0.086141735 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086141735 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 7.2006 15:22:28

0.008202282 = product of:
  0.024606844 = sum of:
    0.024606844 = weight(_text_:m in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024606844 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.0076446384 = product of:
  0.022933915 = sum of:
    0.022933915 = product of:
      0.04586783 = sum of:
        0.04586783 = weight(_text_:de in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04586783 = score(doc=3106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this paper we analyze a major part of the research output of the Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) community in the period 2000 to 2015 from a network analytical perspective. We fo- cus on the paper output presented at the European NKOS workshops in the last 15 years. Our open dataset, the "NKOS bibliography", includes 14 workshop agendas (ECDL 2000-2010, TPDL 2011-2015) and 4 special issues on NKOS (2001, 2004, 2006 and 2015) which cover 171 papers with 218 distinct authors in total. A focus of the analysis is the visualization of co-authorship networks in this interdisciplinary eld. We used standard network analytic measures like degree and betweenness centrality to de- scribe the co-authorship distribution in our NKOS dataset. We can see in our dataset that 15% (with degree=0) of authors had no co-authorship with others and 53% of them had a maximum of 3 cooperations with other authors. 32% had at least 4 co-authors for all of their papers. The NKOS co-author network in the "NKOS bibliography" is a typical co- authorship network with one relatively large component, many smaller components and many isolated co-authorships or triples.

0.0076446384 = product of:
  0.022933915 = sum of:
    0.022933915 = product of:
      0.04586783 = sum of:
        0.04586783 = weight(_text_:de in 3863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04586783 = score(doc=3863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 3863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.006151711 = product of:
  0.018455133 = sum of:
    0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 5057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018455133 = score(doc=5057,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044957645 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 5057, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5057)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)