Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.03
    0.02953177 = product of:
      0.044297654 = sum of:
        0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018455133 = score(doc=1967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
        0.025842521 = product of:
          0.051685043 = sum of:
            0.051685043 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051685043 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  2. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.02
    0.024485704 = product of:
      0.036728553 = sum of:
        0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018455133 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
        0.01827342 = product of:
          0.03654684 = sum of:
            0.03654684 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03654684 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  3. Bastos Vieira, S.; DeBrito, M.; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.: Developing imaged KOS with the FRSAD Model : a conceptual methodology (2016) 0.02
    0.0238312 = product of:
      0.035746798 = sum of:
        0.017399667 = weight(_text_:m in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017399667 = score(doc=3109,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.15552804 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
        0.018347131 = product of:
          0.036694262 = sum of:
            0.036694262 = weight(_text_:de in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036694262 = score(doc=3109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.18992399 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This proposal presents the methodology of indexing with images suggested by De Brito and Caribé (2015). The imagetic model is used as a compatible mechanism with FRSAD for a global information share and use of subject data, both within the library sector and beyond. The conceptual model of imagetic indexing shows how images are related to topics and 'key-images' are interpreted as nomens to implement the FRSAD model. Indexing with images consists of using images instead of key-words or descriptors, to represent and organize information. Implementing the imaged navigation in OPACs denotes multiple advantages derived from this rethinking the OPAC anew, since we are looking forward to sharing concepts within the subject authority data. Images, carrying linguistic objects, permeate inter-social and cultural concepts. In practice it includes translated metadata, symmetrical multilingual thesaurus, or any traditional indexing tools. iOPAC embodies efforts focused on conceptual levels as expected from librarians. Imaged interfaces are more intuitive since users do not need specific training for information retrieval, offering easier comprehension of indexing codes, larger conceptual portability of descriptors (as images), and a better interoperability between discourse codes and indexing competences affecting positively social and cultural interoperability. The imagetic methodology deploys R&D fields for more suitable interfaces taking into consideration users with specific needs such as deafness and illiteracy. This methodology arouse questions about the paradigms of the primacy of orality in information systems and pave the way to a legitimacy of multiple perspectives in document indexing by suggesting a more universal communication system based on images. Interdisciplinarity in neurosciences, linguistics and information sciences would be desirable competencies for further investigations about he nature of cognitive processes in information organization and classification while developing assistive KOS for individuals with communication problems, such autism and deafness.
  4. Panzer, M.: Relationships, spaces, and the two faces of Dewey (2008) 0.02
    0.015325277 = product of:
      0.022987915 = sum of:
        0.009227566 = weight(_text_:m in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227566 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.0824812 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
        0.013760349 = product of:
          0.027520698 = sum of:
            0.027520698 = weight(_text_:de in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027520698 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.14244299 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    What are those "other" relationships that Dewey possesses and that seem so important to surface? Firstly, there is the relationship of concepts to resources. Dewey has been used for a long time, and over 200,000 numbers are assigned to information resources each year and added to WorldCat by the Library of Congress and the German National Library alone. Secondly, we have relationships between concepts in the scheme itself. Dewey provides a rich set of non-hierarchical relations, indicating other relevant and related subjects across disciplinary boundaries. Thirdly, perhaps most importantly, there is the relationship between the same concepts across different languages. Dewey has been translated extensively, and current versions are available in French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Briefer representations of the top-three levels (the DDC Summaries) are available in several languages in the DeweyBrowser. This multilingual nature of the scheme allows searchers to access a broader range of resources or to switch the language of--and thus localize--subject metadata seamlessly. MelvilClass, a Dewey front-end developed by the German National Library for the German translation, could be used as a common interface to the DDC in any language, as it is built upon the standard DDC data format. It is not hard to give an example of the basic terminology of a class pulled together in a multilingual way: <class/794.8> a skos:Concept ; skos:notation "794.8"^^ddc:notation ; skos:prefLabel "Computer games"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Computerspiele"@de ; skos:prefLabel "Jeux sur ordinateur"@fr ; skos:prefLabel "Juegos por computador"@es .
  5. Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007) 0.02
    0.015135611 = product of:
      0.045406833 = sum of:
        0.045406833 = product of:
          0.09081367 = sum of:
            0.09081367 = weight(_text_:de in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09081367 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    KoT (Kinds of Tags) is an ongoing joint collaborative research effort with many participants worldwide, including the University of Minho, UKOLN, the University of Bologna, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and La Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. It is focused on the analysis of tags that are in common use in the practice of social tagging, with the aim of discovering how easily tags can be 'normalised' for interoperability with standard metadata environments such as the DC Metadata Terms.
  6. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.01
    0.0142126605 = product of:
      0.04263798 = sum of:
        0.04263798 = product of:
          0.08527596 = sum of:
            0.08527596 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08527596 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  7. Landry, P.: Multilingual Access to Subjects (MACS) (2007) 0.01
    0.012303422 = product of:
      0.036910266 = sum of:
        0.036910266 = weight(_text_:m in 725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036910266 = score(doc=725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=725)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des M-CAST Seminar, Prague 24th November 2006.
  8. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.01
    0.01218228 = product of:
      0.03654684 = sum of:
        0.03654684 = product of:
          0.07309368 = sum of:
            0.07309368 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07309368 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  9. Fayen, E.; Hlava, M.: Crosswalks and the USA perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.010252852 = product of:
      0.030758556 = sum of:
        0.030758556 = weight(_text_:m in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030758556 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.01
    0.010151901 = product of:
      0.030455703 = sum of:
        0.030455703 = product of:
          0.060911406 = sum of:
            0.060911406 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060911406 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  11. Isaac, A.; Raemy, J.A.; Meijers, E.; Valk, S. De; Freire, N.: Metadata aggregation via linked data : results of the Europeana Common Culture project (2020) 0.01
    0.0091735665 = product of:
      0.027520698 = sum of:
        0.027520698 = product of:
          0.055041395 = sum of:
            0.055041395 = weight(_text_:de in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055041395 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Manguinhas, H.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.; Miles, T.; Lima, A.; Neroulidis, A.; Ginouves, V.; Atsidis, D.; Hildebrand, M.; Brinkerink, M.; Gordea, S.: Linking subject labels in cultural heritage metadata to MIMO vocabulary using CultuurLink (2016) 0.01
    0.008699833 = product of:
      0.0260995 = sum of:
        0.0260995 = weight(_text_:m in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0260995 = score(doc=3107,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Krötzsch, M.; Hitzler, P.; Ehrig, M.; Sure, Y.: Category theory in ontology research : concrete gain from an abstract approach (2004 (?)) 0.01
    0.008699833 = product of:
      0.0260995 = sum of:
        0.0260995 = weight(_text_:m in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0260995 = score(doc=4538,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Schubert, C.; Kinkeldey, C.; Reich, H.: Handbuch Datenbankanwendung zur Wissensrepräsentation im Verbundprojekt DeCOVER (2006) 0.01
    0.008202282 = product of:
      0.024606844 = sum of:
        0.024606844 = weight(_text_:m in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024606844 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Datenbank basierte Objektartenbeschreibung dient zur eigenschaftsbasierten Aufnahme aller Objektarten der Kataloge BNTK, CLC; GMES M 2.1, ATKIS und des DeCOVER Vorschlags. Das Ziel der Datenbankanwendung besteht in der 'manuellen' Beziehungsauswertung und Darstellung der gesamten Objektarten bezogen auf die erstellte Wissensrepräsentation. Anhand einer hierarchisch strukturierten Wissensrepräsentation lassen sich mit Ontologien Überführungen von Objektarten verwirklichen, die im Sinne der semantischen Interoperabilität als Zielstellung in dem Verbundprojekt DeCOVER besteht.
  15. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.01
    0.00812152 = product of:
      0.02436456 = sum of:
        0.02436456 = product of:
          0.04872912 = sum of:
            0.04872912 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04872912 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  16. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.01
    0.00812152 = product of:
      0.02436456 = sum of:
        0.02436456 = product of:
          0.04872912 = sum of:
            0.04872912 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04872912 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  17. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Thesauri KOS analysis and selected thesaurus mapping methodology on the project case-study (2007) 0.01
    0.00812152 = product of:
      0.02436456 = sum of:
        0.02436456 = product of:
          0.04872912 = sum of:
            0.04872912 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04872912 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  18. Vocht, L. De: Exploring semantic relationships in the Web of Data : Semantische relaties verkennen in data op het web (2017) 0.01
    0.0076446384 = product of:
      0.022933915 = sum of:
        0.022933915 = product of:
          0.04586783 = sum of:
            0.04586783 = weight(_text_:de in 4232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04586783 = score(doc=4232,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 4232, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    When we speak about finding relationships between resources, it is necessary to dive deeper in the structure. The graph structure of linked data where the semantics give meaning to the relationships between resources enable the execution of pathfinding algorithms. The assigned weights and heuristics are base components of such algorithms and ultimately define (the order) which resources are included in a path. These paths explain indirect connections between resources. Our third technique proposes an algorithm that optimizes the choice of resources in terms of serendipity. Some optimizations guard the consistence of candidate-paths where the coherence of consecutive connections is maximized to avoid trivial and too arbitrary paths. The implementation uses the A* algorithm, the de-facto reference when it comes to heuristically optimized minimal cost paths. The effectiveness of paths was measured based on common automatic metrics and surveys where the users could indicate their preference for paths, generated each time in a different way. Finally, all our techniques are applied to a use case about publications in digital libraries where they are aligned with information about scientific conferences and researchers. The application to this use case is a practical example because the different aspects of exploratory search come together. In fact, the techniques also evolved from the experiences when implementing the use case. Practical details about the semantic model are explained and the implementation of the search system is clarified module by module. The evaluation positions the result, a prototype of a tool to explore scientific publications, researchers and conferences next to some important alternatives.
    Content
    Proefschrift ingediend tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de ingenieurswetenschappen: computerwetenschappen. Vgl. unter: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319667837_Exploring_semantic_relationships_in_the_web_of_data.
  19. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (2004) 0.01
    0.0072498615 = product of:
      0.021749584 = sum of:
        0.021749584 = weight(_text_:m in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021749584 = score(doc=3152,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Table of Contents Part I: Accepted Papers Christoph Tempich and Raphael Volz: Towards a benchmark for Semantic Web reasoners - an analysis of the DAML ontology library M. Carmen Suarez-Figueroa and Asuncion Gomez-Perez: Results of Taxonomic Evaluation of RDF(S) and DAML+OIL ontologies using RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Validation Tools and Ontology Platforms import services Volker Haarslev and Ralf Möller: Racer: A Core Inference Engine for the Semantic Web Mikhail Kazakov and Habib Abdulrab: DL-workbench: a metamodeling approach to ontology manipulation Thorsten Liebig and Olaf Noppens: OntoTrack: Fast Browsing and Easy Editing of Large Ontologie Frederic Fürst, Michel Leclere, and Francky Trichet: TooCoM : a Tool to Operationalize an Ontology with the Conceptual Graph Model Naoki Sugiura, Masaki Kurematsu, Naoki Fukuta, Noriaki Izumi, and Takahira Yamaguchi: A domain ontology engineering tool with general ontologies and text corpus Howard Goldberg, Alfredo Morales, David MacMillan, and Matthew Quinlan: An Ontology-Driven Application to Improve the Prescription of Educational Resources to Parents of Premature Infants Part II: Experiment Contributions Domain natural language description for the experiment Raphael Troncy, Antoine Isaac, and Veronique Malaise: Using XSLT for Interoperability: DOE and The Travelling Domain Experiment Christian Fillies: SemTalk EON2003 Semantic Web Export / Import Interface Test Óscar Corcho, Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Danilo José Guerrero-Rodríguez, David Pérez-Rey, Alberto Ruiz-Cristina, Teresa Sastre-Toral, M. Carmen Suárez-Figueroa: Evaluation experiment of ontology tools' interoperability with the WebODE ontology engineering workbench Holger Knublauch: Case Study: Using Protege to Convert the Travel Ontology to UML and OWL Franz Calvo and John Gennari: Interoperability of Protege 2.0 beta and OilEd 3.5 in the Domain Knowledge of Osteoporosis
  20. Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007) 0.01
    0.0071063302 = product of:
      0.02131899 = sum of:
        0.02131899 = product of:
          0.04263798 = sum of:
            0.04263798 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04263798 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:27

Languages

  • e 31
  • d 3

Types