Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.04
    0.040705882 = product of:
      0.122117646 = sum of:
        0.122117646 = sum of:
          0.073388524 = weight(_text_:de in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073388524 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044957645 = queryNorm
              0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.04872912 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04872912 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044957645 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
    Editor
    Carroll, J.J. u. J. de Roo
  2. Van de Sompel, H.: Thoughts about repositories, use, and re-use (2008) 0.02
    0.018347133 = product of:
      0.055041395 = sum of:
        0.055041395 = product of:
          0.11008279 = sum of:
            0.11008279 = weight(_text_:de in 4366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11008279 = score(doc=4366,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 4366, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4366)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Panzer, M.: Relationships, spaces, and the two faces of Dewey (2008) 0.02
    0.015325277 = product of:
      0.022987915 = sum of:
        0.009227566 = weight(_text_:m in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227566 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.0824812 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
        0.013760349 = product of:
          0.027520698 = sum of:
            0.027520698 = weight(_text_:de in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027520698 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.14244299 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    What are those "other" relationships that Dewey possesses and that seem so important to surface? Firstly, there is the relationship of concepts to resources. Dewey has been used for a long time, and over 200,000 numbers are assigned to information resources each year and added to WorldCat by the Library of Congress and the German National Library alone. Secondly, we have relationships between concepts in the scheme itself. Dewey provides a rich set of non-hierarchical relations, indicating other relevant and related subjects across disciplinary boundaries. Thirdly, perhaps most importantly, there is the relationship between the same concepts across different languages. Dewey has been translated extensively, and current versions are available in French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Briefer representations of the top-three levels (the DDC Summaries) are available in several languages in the DeweyBrowser. This multilingual nature of the scheme allows searchers to access a broader range of resources or to switch the language of--and thus localize--subject metadata seamlessly. MelvilClass, a Dewey front-end developed by the German National Library for the German translation, could be used as a common interface to the DDC in any language, as it is built upon the standard DDC data format. It is not hard to give an example of the basic terminology of a class pulled together in a multilingual way: <class/794.8> a skos:Concept ; skos:notation "794.8"^^ddc:notation ; skos:prefLabel "Computer games"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Computerspiele"@de ; skos:prefLabel "Jeux sur ordinateur"@fr ; skos:prefLabel "Juegos por computador"@es .
  4. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.01
    0.0142126605 = product of:
      0.04263798 = sum of:
        0.04263798 = product of:
          0.08527596 = sum of:
            0.08527596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08527596 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  5. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01
    0.01218228 = product of:
      0.03654684 = sum of:
        0.03654684 = product of:
          0.07309368 = sum of:
            0.07309368 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07309368 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  6. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.01
    0.01218228 = product of:
      0.03654684 = sum of:
        0.03654684 = product of:
          0.07309368 = sum of:
            0.07309368 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07309368 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  7. Hori, M.; Euzenat, J.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.: OWL Web Ontology Language XML Presentation Syntax (2003) 0.01
    0.008202282 = product of:
      0.024606844 = sum of:
        0.024606844 = weight(_text_:m in 4680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024606844 = score(doc=4680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4680)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (2004) 0.01
    0.0072498615 = product of:
      0.021749584 = sum of:
        0.021749584 = weight(_text_:m in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021749584 = score(doc=3152,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Table of Contents Part I: Accepted Papers Christoph Tempich and Raphael Volz: Towards a benchmark for Semantic Web reasoners - an analysis of the DAML ontology library M. Carmen Suarez-Figueroa and Asuncion Gomez-Perez: Results of Taxonomic Evaluation of RDF(S) and DAML+OIL ontologies using RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Validation Tools and Ontology Platforms import services Volker Haarslev and Ralf Möller: Racer: A Core Inference Engine for the Semantic Web Mikhail Kazakov and Habib Abdulrab: DL-workbench: a metamodeling approach to ontology manipulation Thorsten Liebig and Olaf Noppens: OntoTrack: Fast Browsing and Easy Editing of Large Ontologie Frederic Fürst, Michel Leclere, and Francky Trichet: TooCoM : a Tool to Operationalize an Ontology with the Conceptual Graph Model Naoki Sugiura, Masaki Kurematsu, Naoki Fukuta, Noriaki Izumi, and Takahira Yamaguchi: A domain ontology engineering tool with general ontologies and text corpus Howard Goldberg, Alfredo Morales, David MacMillan, and Matthew Quinlan: An Ontology-Driven Application to Improve the Prescription of Educational Resources to Parents of Premature Infants Part II: Experiment Contributions Domain natural language description for the experiment Raphael Troncy, Antoine Isaac, and Veronique Malaise: Using XSLT for Interoperability: DOE and The Travelling Domain Experiment Christian Fillies: SemTalk EON2003 Semantic Web Export / Import Interface Test Óscar Corcho, Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Danilo José Guerrero-Rodríguez, David Pérez-Rey, Alberto Ruiz-Cristina, Teresa Sastre-Toral, M. Carmen Suárez-Figueroa: Evaluation experiment of ontology tools' interoperability with the WebODE ontology engineering workbench Holger Knublauch: Case Study: Using Protege to Convert the Travel Ontology to UML and OWL Franz Calvo and John Gennari: Interoperability of Protege 2.0 beta and OilEd 3.5 in the Domain Knowledge of Osteoporosis
  9. Brake, M.: ¬Das Semantische Web : Eine Vision in der Halbzeit (2005) 0.01
    0.007176996 = product of:
      0.021530988 = sum of:
        0.021530988 = weight(_text_:m in 4764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021530988 = score(doc=4764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 4764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4764)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004) 0.01
    0.007176996 = product of:
      0.021530988 = sum of:
        0.021530988 = weight(_text_:m in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021530988 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Editor
    Dean, M. u. G. Schreiber
  11. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.01
    0.0071063302 = product of:
      0.02131899 = sum of:
        0.02131899 = product of:
          0.04263798 = sum of:
            0.04263798 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04263798 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15743402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  12. Christophides, V.; Plexousakis, D.; Scholl, M.; Tourtounis, S.: On labeling schemes for the Semantic Web (2003) 0.01
    0.006151711 = product of:
      0.018455133 = sum of:
        0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018455133 = score(doc=3393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004) 0.01
    0.006151711 = product of:
      0.018455133 = sum of:
        0.018455133 = weight(_text_:m in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018455133 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Jacobs, I.: From chaos, order: W3C standard helps organize knowledge : SKOS Connects Diverse Knowledge Organization Systems to Linked Data (2009) 0.01
    0.005351247 = product of:
      0.01605374 = sum of:
        0.01605374 = product of:
          0.03210748 = sum of:
            0.03210748 = weight(_text_:de in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03210748 = score(doc=3062,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.193205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044957645 = queryNorm
                0.16618349 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    SKOS Adapts to the Diversity of Knowledge Organization Systems A useful starting point for understanding the role of SKOS is the set of subject headings published by the US Library of Congress (LOC) for categorizing books, videos, and other library resources. These headings can be used to broaden or narrow queries for discovering resources. For instance, one can narrow a query about books on "Chinese literature" to "Chinese drama," or further still to "Chinese children's plays." Library of Congress subject headings have evolved within a community of practice over a period of decades. By now publishing these subject headings in SKOS, the Library of Congress has made them available to the linked data community, which benefits from a time-tested set of concepts to re-use in their own data. This re-use adds value ("the network effect") to the collection. When people all over the Web re-use the same LOC concept for "Chinese drama," or a concept from some other vocabulary linked to it, this creates many new routes to the discovery of information, and increases the chances that relevant items will be found. As an example of mapping one vocabulary to another, a combined effort from the STITCH, TELplus and MACS Projects provides links between LOC concepts and RAMEAU, a collection of French subject headings used by the Bibliothèque Nationale de France and other institutions. SKOS can be used for subject headings but also many other approaches to organizing knowledge. Because different communities are comfortable with different organization schemes, SKOS is designed to port diverse knowledge organization systems to the Web. "Active participation from the library and information science community in the development of SKOS over the past seven years has been key to ensuring that SKOS meets a variety of needs," said Thomas Baker, co-chair of the Semantic Web Deployment Working Group, which published SKOS. "One goal in creating SKOS was to provide new uses for well-established knowledge organization systems by providing a bridge to the linked data cloud." SKOS is part of the Semantic Web technology stack. Like the Web Ontology Language (OWL), SKOS can be used to define vocabularies. But the two technologies were designed to meet different needs. SKOS is a simple language with just a few features, tuned for sharing and linking knowledge organization systems such as thesauri and classification schemes. OWL offers a general and powerful framework for knowledge representation, where additional "rigor" can afford additional benefits (for instance, business rule processing). To get started with SKOS, see the SKOS Primer.
  15. Miles, A.; Matthews, B.; Beckett, D.; Brickley, D.; Wilson, M.; Rogers, N.: SKOS: A language to describe simple knowledge structures for the web (2005) 0.00
    0.003588498 = product of:
      0.010765494 = sum of:
        0.010765494 = weight(_text_:m in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010765494 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.09622806 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Isaac, A.: Aligning thesauri for an integrated access to Cultural Heritage Resources (2007) 0.00
    0.003588498 = product of:
      0.010765494 = sum of:
        0.010765494 = weight(_text_:m in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010765494 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11187479 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044957645 = queryNorm
            0.09622806 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    References [1] http:// www.theeuropeanlibrary.org [2] http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl [3] http://macs.cenl.org [4] Day, M., Koch, T., Neuroth, H.: Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus service. In Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam , 2005. [5] http://stitch.cs.vu.nl [6] http://mandragore.bnf.fr [7] http://www.iconclass.nl [8] www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ 1 The Semantic Web vision supposes sharing data using different conceptualizations (ontologies), and therefore implies to tackle the semantic interoperability problem