Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996)
0.04
0.04413169 = product of:
0.06619753 = sum of:
0.014047092 = weight(_text_:a in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014047092 = score(doc=740,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.05215044 = product of:
0.10430088 = sum of:
0.10430088 = weight(_text_:de in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10430088 = score(doc=740,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports an experiment, conducted in Mar 95 in the context of a course at the School of Library and Information Science at the University of Montreal, which evaluates the information retrieval capabilities of a manual index and a semi automated index developed according to the Bennion method. The application of a formula developed by Bennion shows that the indexes are almost identical
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Manual and automated indexing: a comparison of the performance of 2 indexes of a monograph
- Type
- a