Search (201 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Keyser, P. de: Conversions to and from CDS/ISIS : an overview of the possibilities, problems and programs (2000) 0.04
    0.042185232 = product of:
      0.06327785 = sum of:
        0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007963953 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
        0.055313893 = product of:
          0.110627785 = sum of:
            0.110627785 = weight(_text_:de in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110627785 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Moore, D.: ¬La choix d'un logiciel de formatage bibliographique à la Bibliothèque de l'Assemblée Nationale de Quebec (1994) 0.04
    0.041638024 = product of:
      0.062457036 = sum of:
        0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065699257 = score(doc=857,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
        0.05588711 = product of:
          0.11177422 = sum of:
            0.11177422 = weight(_text_:de in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11177422 = score(doc=857,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.5756765 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the methodology used to evaluate 5 examples of bibliographic management software currently available. Provides a profile of the Library of the National Assemply of Quebec and the services it offers: reference, research, and reconstruction of debates. Identifies the problems it faces and presents an evaluation of its technical needs, needs relating to data control and bibliographies, and staff needs. Analyzes specialist information and the preliminary list of chosen programmes and compares the software using the following criteria: ease of use; assistance; customization; research; networking capabilities; transferabiblity; and price. Considers reasons for the ultimate choice of library master and discusses the question of staff training
    Type
    a
  3. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.04
    0.039725985 = product of:
      0.059588976 = sum of:
        0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010618603 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
        0.048970375 = product of:
          0.09794075 = sum of:
            0.09794075 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09794075 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
    Type
    a
  4. Bourgault, J.-D.: Usage des ressources de L'Internet comme outils de support pour les logiciels bibliographiques (1995) 0.03
    0.033518184 = product of:
      0.050277274 = sum of:
        0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046456386 = score(doc=5747,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
        0.045631636 = product of:
          0.09126327 = sum of:
            0.09126327 = weight(_text_:de in 5747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09126327 = score(doc=5747,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 5747, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5747)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Laan, H.v.d.: Endnote Plus voor de eindgebruiker (1997) 0.03
    0.031663023 = product of:
      0.04749453 = sum of:
        0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010618603 = score(doc=360,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
        0.03687593 = product of:
          0.07375186 = sum of:
            0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07375186 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A review of EndNote Plus which enables users to create and export lists of references for use in wordprocessing packages. The system has been available for some time, but a new version (2.3) has improved the links between database and wordprocessing packages. Creation of reference lists is a simple task and searching is rapid, although indexing is rather slow. Documentation and online help screens are more that adequate and an active discussion group is maintained by the supplier. It is particular suitable in conjunction with Windows
    Type
    a
  6. Sieverts, E.: ProCite voor de eingebruiker (1997) 0.03
    0.029589612 = product of:
      0.044384416 = sum of:
        0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 90) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075084865 = score(doc=90,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 90, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=90)
        0.03687593 = product of:
          0.07375186 = sum of:
            0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 90) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07375186 = score(doc=90,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 90, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=90)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Contribution to a thematic issue on the networked library
    Type
    a
  7. Heller, L.: Ergebnisse der Benutzerumfrage "Literaturverwaltung - Was ich benutze und was ich brauche", TIB/UB Hannover 2011 (2011) 0.03
    0.028123489 = product of:
      0.042185232 = sum of:
        0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053093014 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
        0.03687593 = product of:
          0.07375186 = sum of:
            0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07375186 = score(doc=4884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Raw data set (in CSV format) of a user survey about usage and needs regarding reference management software (like Endnote, Zotero, Citavi) in germany 2011. Participants were mainly college students, librarians, and other users of reference management software.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: http://www.tib.uni-hannover.de/de/aktuelles/aktuell/newsdetail/article/citavi-endnote-zotero-und-co/62.html.
  8. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.03
    0.026942063 = product of:
      0.040413093 = sum of:
        0.015927905 = weight(_text_:a in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015927905 = score(doc=561,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30574775 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
    Type
    a
  9. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Nieuwland, A.; Groeneveld, C.; Zwart, B. de: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.6: various additional programs (1993) 0.03
    0.02546151 = product of:
      0.038192265 = sum of:
        0.010535319 = weight(_text_:a in 5051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010535319 = score(doc=5051,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 5051, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5051)
        0.027656946 = product of:
          0.055313893 = sum of:
            0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 5051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055313893 = score(doc=5051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 5051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the sixth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of nine programs are presented and various properties and qualities of these programs are discussed. We discuss additional programs for information storage and retrieval and for text retrieval from several of the various categories which have been looked at in previous instalments. On new (secondary) type of ISR software is defined as administrative software. The program review in this issue are BRS-Search, dtSearch, InfoBank, Micro-OPC, Q&A, STN-PFS, Strix, TINman and ZYIndex. All but dtSearch and ZYIndex can be regarded as primarily classical retrieval packages; Q&A boasts comprehensive administrative features as well; dtSearch and ZYIndex are indexing programs. For ZYIndex a new Windows version has been tested. All other programs run under MS-DOS. For each of the nine programs about 100 facts and test results are tabulated. All the programs are individually discussed as well
    Object
    Q&A
    Type
    a
  10. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.02
    0.0242381 = product of:
      0.03635715 = sum of:
        0.01187196 = weight(_text_:a in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01187196 = score(doc=340,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Overviews database applications in libraries. Explains the 2 basic types of databases, flat-file and relational, outlines the uses and advantages of relationship systems. Librarians can utilise a number of software packages for database management and design a database in cooperation with a programmer. The librarian needs to be involved in the conceptual and external level of database design. Offers advice on finding a database designer. Outlines ideas for library related applications of database software
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
    Type
    a
  11. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.02
    0.0242381 = product of:
      0.03635715 = sum of:
        0.01187196 = weight(_text_:a in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01187196 = score(doc=2878,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Type
    a
  12. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.02
    0.023402527 = product of:
      0.03510379 = sum of:
        0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010618603 = score(doc=7701,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
    Type
    a
  13. Brandt, D.S.: Ovid searching software (1996) 0.02
    0.023402527 = product of:
      0.03510379 = sum of:
        0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010618603 = score(doc=6754,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews Ovid searching software, a system for searching and manipulating output from bibliographic databases. It allows fields of indexes to be searched, or for terms of a controlled vocabulary to be mapped, provides a variety of display options and permits customisation of system features. Output may be directed to e-mail. Ovid interface with over 80 commercial databases to exploit the features of each. Covers vendor and user profiles; operating environment; user interface, search strategies; display and manipulation of documents; and documentation
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Type
    a
  14. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.02
    0.022454113 = product of:
      0.03368117 = sum of:
        0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009195981 = score(doc=5055,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the work of the E. Del Webb Memorial Library, Loma Linda Univ., in using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer and Pro-Cite software to produce a bibliography listing the latest books added to the library collection. Describes the use of the macro facility of WordPerfect for Windows to process records downloaded using the recent PRISM version of the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
    Type
    a
  15. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.02
    0.022454113 = product of:
      0.03368117 = sum of:
        0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009195981 = score(doc=1974,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A comparison was made between CDS/ISIS, ist Windows version WINISIS, and InMagic's INMAGIC and DB/TextWorks software. Packages were evaluated for their database creation, information retrieval and report production capabilities. Windows versions were found to provide significant enhancements over DOS versions of software. The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages to a developing country of creating bibliographic databases using commercial software
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
    Type
    a
  16. Rothera, H.: Framing the subject : a subject indexing model for electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities (1998) 0.02
    0.022454113 = product of:
      0.03368117 = sum of:
        0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009195981 = score(doc=3904,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews in detail an MA dissertation to assess the scope and value of electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities. Develops and demonstrates a model to determine essential and desirable indexing terms and to highlight some inherent complexities. Assesses features of commercially available databases against this model. Presents personal observations on the dissertation experience and on prospects for further research in this area
    Source
    Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.24-33
    Type
    a
  17. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.02
    0.021329116 = product of:
      0.031993672 = sum of:
        0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075084865 = score(doc=2830,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
    Type
    a
  18. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.02
    0.01975108 = product of:
      0.02962662 = sum of:
        0.011262729 = weight(_text_:a in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011262729 = score(doc=2810,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
        0.01836389 = product of:
          0.03672778 = sum of:
            0.03672778 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03672778 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    On Nov 26, 1997, Research Information Systems released its newest version of the ProCite bibliographic management software. The most notable change to the programme is the retooling for compatibility with Windows 95 and NT. In addition to the Windows 95 upgrade, ProCite added 2 new workforms. These forms allow users to capture information about Web pages and e-mail messages. This latest release builds on the Cite While You Write feature that allows users to link citations in a single manuscript to records in multiple databases. The program simplifies the generation of bibliographies and endnotes while allowing users to create bibliographic databases using 28 distinct workforms. Workforms cover a wide range of materials to patents. While there are a few idiosyncrasies users should be aware of, this product is a solid addition to the librarian's toolkit and should be considered by those libraries that have a need for a small but powerful programme to catalogue resources and create bibliographies
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Type
    a
  19. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.02
    0.01975108 = product of:
      0.02962662 = sum of:
        0.011262729 = weight(_text_:a in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011262729 = score(doc=5583,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.01836389 = product of:
          0.03672778 = sum of:
            0.03672778 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03672778 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
    Type
    a
  20. Mahmood, K.: ¬The best library software for developing countries : more than 30 plus points of Micro CDS/ISIS (1997) 0.02
    0.019647349 = product of:
      0.029471021 = sum of:
        0.008046483 = weight(_text_:a in 7890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008046483 = score(doc=7890,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 7890, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7890)
        0.02142454 = product of:
          0.04284908 = sum of:
            0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 7890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04284908 = score(doc=7890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the features of a library automation application called Micro CDS/ISIS. The software produced by UNESCO is used by more than 15.000 instituions all over the world. It is cost free and readily available. Its technical features include minimum hardware requirements, large database capacity, variable length fields, repeatable fields, subfields, powerful indexing, and rapid searching. It follows international data exchange standards. Support features include extensive documentation and a worldwide user group. Training courses in CDS/ISIS are conducted worldwide. These features ensure that CDS/ISIS library software is ideal for developing countries
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 146
  • d 38
  • i 5
  • f 3
  • nl 3
  • ru 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 184
  • m 9
  • el 5
  • s 4
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications