Search (371 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Dreyer, B.; Hagemann-Wilholt, S.; Vierkant, P.; Strecker, D.; Glagla-Dietz, S.; Summann, F.; Pampel, H.; Burger, M.: ¬Die Rolle der ORCID iD in der Wissenschaftskommunikation : der Beitrag des ORCID-Deutschland-Konsortiums und das ORCID-DE-Projekt (2019) 0.03 
    0.033518184 = product of:
  0.050277274 = sum of:
    0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 5349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046456386 = score(doc=5349,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5349, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5349)
    0.045631636 = product of:
      0.09126327 = sum of:
        0.09126327 = weight(_text_:de in 5349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09126327 = score(doc=5349,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 5349, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5349)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    ORCID schafft mit Services wie der eindeutigen Verknüpfung von Forschenden und ihren Publikationen die Basis moderner Wissenschaftskommunikation. Das ORCID-Deutschland-Konsortium bietet eine kostenreduzierte ORCID-Premiummitgliedschaft an und unterstützt die Mitglieder bei der erfolgreichen ORCID-Integration. Diese umfasst neben einer Dialogplattform mit deutschsprachigen Informationsmaterialien weitere Supportleistungen. Ein wichtiger Erfolgsfaktor ist außerdem eine umfassende Kommunikationsstrategie der ORCID-Implementierung. Hier können die Mitglieder auf etablierte Kommunikationskanäle innerhalb ihrer Einrichtungen zurückgreifen. Gemeinsam leisten sie mit der Unterstützung des ORCID-DE-Projekts einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur erfolgreichen Verbreitung von ORCID in Deutschland.
    Type
    a
  2. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬The new FRBR-LRM model : some accents (2016) 0.03 
    0.030714607 = product of:
  0.04607191 = sum of:
    0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009195981 = score(doc=4940,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
    0.03687593 = product of:
      0.07375186 = sum of:
        0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07375186 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
    Type
    a
  3. Franca, A.S.; Silveira, N.C.: ¬The bibliographic representation of authorship of autochthonous communities (2016) 0.03 
    0.030714607 = product of:
  0.04607191 = sum of:
    0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 4948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009195981 = score(doc=4948,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4948, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4948)
    0.03687593 = product of:
      0.07375186 = sum of:
        0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 4948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07375186 = score(doc=4948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4948)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
    Type
    a
  4. Groat, G. de: ¬A history of video game cataloging in U.S. libraries (2015) 0.03 
    0.029589612 = product of:
  0.044384416 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 2014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=2014,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2014, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2014)
    0.03687593 = product of:
      0.07375186 = sum of:
        0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 2014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07375186 = score(doc=2014,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 2014, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2014)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Type
    a
  5. MacEwan, A.; Angjeli, A.; Gatenby, J.: ¬The International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) : the evolving future of name authority control (2013) 0.03 
    0.029097255 = product of:
  0.04364588 = sum of:
    0.011379444 = weight(_text_:a in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011379444 = score(doc=1939,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
    0.032266438 = product of:
      0.064532876 = sum of:
        0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064532876 = score(doc=1939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article describes the project to build the initial International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) database by deploying the techniques used to develop the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF). It focuses particularly on the work of the OCLC team in transforming the VIAF "resource file" model of matched data into a robust, operational, and authoritative file of uniquely assigned ISNIs as a base for an ongoing ISNI assignment system, and on the quality assurance validation of the database provided by the British Library and the Bibliothèque nationale de France. The need for future interaction between ongoing ISNI assignment and name authority control in libraries is also explored.
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue "Cataloging collaborations and partnerships"
    Type
    a
  6. Hartmann, S.; Pampel, H.: GND und ORCID : Brückenschlag zwischen zwei Systemen zur Autorenidentifikation (2017) 0.03 
    0.02872987 = product of:
  0.043094806 = sum of:
    0.0039819763 = weight(_text_:a in 5115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039819763 = score(doc=5115,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 5115, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5115)
    0.03911283 = product of:
      0.07822566 = sum of:
        0.07822566 = weight(_text_:de in 5115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07822566 = score(doc=5115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 5115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Die Uneindeutigkeit von Personennamen erschwert im Rahmen der bibliothekarischen Erschließung die eindeutige Zuordnung von Autorinnen und Autoren zu ihren Werken. Bibliotheken im deutschsprachigen Raum adressieren das Problem der Mehrdeutigkeit von Namen durch den Einsatz der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND). Die internationale Initiative ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) verfolgt das gleiche Ziel. Akteur ist hier jedoch die einzelne Wissenschaftlerin oder der einzelne Wissenschaftler. Das Projekt "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" hat sich, dank der Förderung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), unter anderem zum Ziel gesetzt, einen Brückenschlag zwischen den beiden Systemen - GND und ORCID - zu schaffen, um damit die Datenqualität beider Systeme wechselseitig zu erhöhen. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über ORCID und das Projekt ORCID DE. Dabei wird insbesondere auf die angestrebte Verlinkung von GND und ORCID eingegangen.
    Type
    a
  7. Mejía, J.A.; García, C.; Ramos, A.; Hernández, O.: Implementation of RDA to bibliographic and authority records from the LIBRUNAM catalog at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (2014) 0.03 
    0.02556101 = product of:
  0.038341515 = sum of:
    0.005747488 = weight(_text_:a in 1992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005747488 = score(doc=1992,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1992, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1992)
    0.032594025 = product of:
      0.06518805 = sum of:
        0.06518805 = weight(_text_:de in 1992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06518805 = score(doc=1992,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.33574134 = fieldWeight in 1992, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the implementation of the new cataloging code, Resource Description and Access (RDA), to the bibliographic and authority records of the LIBRUNAM catalog. In 2010, the Dirección General de Bibliotecas started analyzing this new cataloging code through the use of the RDA Toolkit and other documentation related to RDA. During this process, the core elements for bibliographic and authority records were identified and retrospective changes were automatically carried out using the Aleph Library Management System. For those records that needed modifications, manual updates were made, while RDA instructions were applied to new records. The updating of each element is described, including carrier and content types, preferred titles in the original language, and conventional and collective titles for religious works. Elements defined in Chapter 9 and Chapter 11, and relationship designators defined in Appendix K were added to authority records for personal names. These retrospective updates were made to 1,500,000 bibliographic records and 73,000 authority records. The adoption of the RDA code in LIBRUNAM accomplishes support for the main user tasks: Find, identify, select, and obtain.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "RDA around the world"
    Type
    a
  8. Santana Silva, A.C.; Duarte Ferreira, T.; Azevedo Martins, L. de: Development and challenges in old manuscripts cataloging : the experience of the National Library of Portugal (2016) 0.02 
    0.024608051 = product of:
  0.036912076 = sum of:
    0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 5124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046456386 = score(doc=5124,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5124, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5124)
    0.032266438 = product of:
      0.064532876 = sum of:
        0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 5124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064532876 = score(doc=5124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 5124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5124)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Type
    a
  9. Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012) 0.02 
    0.023402527 = product of:
  0.03510379 = sum of:
    0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010618603 = score(doc=4564,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships are one of the most active research areas in knowledge organization, especially in cataloguing. This study attempts to examine and map the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) bibliographic relationships with Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships, and to a ssess the congruence between them. The FRBR conceptual model provides a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships in chapter 5, illustrating them in 11 tables. This study shows that there is considerable congruence between these two taxonomies.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:13:52
    Type
    a
  10. Pampel, H.; Fenner, M.: ORCID - Offener Standard zur Vernetzung von Forschenden (2016) 0.02 
    0.023060096 = product of:
  0.034590144 = sum of:
    0.0026546507 = weight(_text_:a in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026546507 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
    0.031935494 = product of:
      0.06387099 = sum of:
        0.06387099 = weight(_text_:de in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387099 = score(doc=2839,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.328958 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Das internationale ORCID-Konsortium vernetzt Publizierende mit ihren Aufsätzen und Forschungsdaten über eine eindeutige ID. Weltweit besitzen bereits über 2 Millionen Forschende eine solche Kennung. Um ORCID in Deutschland zu fördern, wurde das Projektvorhaben "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" gebildet. Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) hat die Förderung des auf drei Jahre angelegten Projekts im Februar 2016 bewilligt. Durch die Integration in über 230 digitale Informationsinfrastrukturen erleichtert die Open Researcher and Contributor ID, kurz ORCID, die Pflege der Publikationsliste für Forscherinnen und Forscher. Die Idee dahinter ist folgende: Jede Person, die im wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsprozess einen Beitrag leistet, kann sich über die eindeutige ORCID-Kennung mit ihren Publikationen, Forschungsdaten und anderen Produkten des Forschungsprozesses (zum Beispiel Software) eindeutig vernetzen. Damit werden diese Objekte sichtbar und technisch verlässlich mit ihren Erschafferinnen und Erschaffern verbunden. ORCID bietet das Potenzial, bisher verteilte Informationen standardisiert zusammenzuführen und damit einen Überblick auf die Forschungsleistung von Forschenden zu ermöglichen. Durch die Offenheit des Systems und des großen internationalen Konsortiums ist ORCID auf dem Weg, ein langfristig gültiger Identifikator im wissenschaftlichen Alltag zu werden.
    Ziel des DFG-Projekts ORCID DE ist es, die vielerorts erwogene Implementierung der ORCID an Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen durch einen übergreifenden Ansatz nachhaltig zu unterstützen. Dabei stehen organisatorische, technische und rechtliche Fragen gleichermaßen im Fokus. Neben der Schaffung einer zentralen Anlaufstelle für Hochschulen und außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen sind die Vernetzung und Verbreitung der ORCID im Bereich von Open-Access-Repositorien und -Publikationdiensten sowie die Verzahnung mit der Gemeinsame Normdatei (GND) wesentliche Aspekte des Projekts. Projektpartner von ORCID DE sind das Helmholtz Open Science Koordinationsbüro am Deutschen GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek und die Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld. Das Projekt wurde durch die Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation (DINI) initiiert.
    Type
    a
  11. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.02 
    0.023042928 = product of:
  0.03456439 = sum of:
    0.013139851 = weight(_text_:a in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013139851 = score(doc=2609,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  12. RDA Toolkit (2) : August 2017 (2017) 0.02 
    0.023035955 = product of:
  0.03455393 = sum of:
    0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006896985 = score(doc=3995,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
    0.027656946 = product of:
      0.055313893 = sum of:
        0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055313893 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Am 8. August 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/august2017release> erschienen. Mit diesem Release ist die deutsche Übersetzung auf demselben Stand wie die englische Originalausgabe vom April 2017. Alle Änderungen aus dem Proposalverfahren 2016 und auch aus den Fast Tracks (für kleinere Änderungen) sind eingearbeitet und übersetzt. Ebenfalls aktualisiert wurden Glossar und RDA Registry<http://www.rdaregistry.info/>. Die deutsche Übersetzung ist im Zeitplan des 3R-Projekts (RDA Toolkit Restructure and Redesign Projekt). Alle anderen Übersetzungen des RDA Toolkits werden später im Jahr folgen. Die Änderungsdokumentation für das August-Release des RDA Toolkit finden Sie im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/3xLSBg>. Aktualisiert wurden auch die von der Fachgruppe Erschließung (FG E) kooperativ erarbeiteten Anwendungsrichtlinien für den deutschsprachigen Raum (D-A-CH). Diese sind auch in Französisch abrufbar. Eine Gesamtübersicht der D-A-CH AWR pro Kapitel ist im RDA Toolkit unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen". Die Änderungsdokumentation der D-A-CH AWR finden Sie ebenfalls im RDA-Info-Wiki.<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg>. [Inetbib vom 09.08.2017].
    Content
    Vgl. auch: http://www.aspb.de/de/rda/.
  13. Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.02 
    0.021869322 = product of:
  0.032803982 = sum of:
    0.011379444 = weight(_text_:a in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011379444 = score(doc=2546,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  14. Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011) 0.02 
    0.021208337 = product of:
  0.031812504 = sum of:
    0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010387965 = score(doc=1899,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:36:22
    Type
    a
  15. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.02 
    0.021208337 = product of:
  0.031812504 = sum of:
    0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010387965 = score(doc=1934,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
    Type
    a
  16. Fuchs, C.; Pampel, H.; Vierkant, P.: ORCID in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer Bestandsaufnahme im Jahr 2016 (2017) 0.02 
    0.021092616 = product of:
  0.031638924 = sum of:
    0.0039819763 = weight(_text_:a in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039819763 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
    0.027656946 = product of:
      0.055313893 = sum of:
        0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055313893 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Die Open Researcher and Contributor ID, kurz ORCID, ist eine eindeutige Kennung für Forscherinnen und Forscher und ermöglicht die Verbindung zwischen Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern mit ihren Aufsätzen, Forschungsdaten und weiteren Produkten des wissenschaftlichen Schaffens. Im Rahmen des dreijährigen DFG-Projektes "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" wird die vielerorts erwogene Implementierung der ORCID an Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen gefördert. Der vorliegende Beitrag bietet einen umfassenden Überblick über die Ergebnisse der im Rahmen des Projekts durchgeführten Umfrage zum Stand der Implementierung von ORCID an wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen in Deutschland. Die Umfrage wurde im Zeitraum vom 13.07.2016 bis 03.08.2016 durchgeführt und bietet zahlreiche Erkenntnisse sowohl über den Stand der Implementierung von ORCID an wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen in Deutschland als auch über bestehende technische, rechtliche und organisatorische Hürden bei der Implementierung des Dienstes.
    Type
    a
  17. Hamm, S.; Schneider, K.: Automatische Erschließung von Universitätsdissertationen (2015) 0.02 
    0.019862993 = product of:
  0.029794488 = sum of:
    0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053093014 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22
    Type
    a
  18. RDA Toolkit (3) : Oktober 2017 (2017) 0.02 
    0.01978939 = product of:
  0.029684084 = sum of:
    0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 3994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066366266 = score(doc=3994,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3994, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3994)
    0.023047457 = product of:
      0.046094913 = sum of:
        0.046094913 = weight(_text_:de in 3994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046094913 = score(doc=3994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 3994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Am 10. Oktober 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits erschienen. Aufgrund des 3R-Projekts (RDA Toolkit Restruction and Redesign Project) gab es keine inhaltlichen Änderungen am Regelwerkstext. Es wurden ausschließlich Änderungen an den D-A-CH vorgenommen, die in der Änderungsdokumentation im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg> aufgelistet sind. Die Gesamtübersicht der D-A-CH nach Kapiteln finden Sie im RDA Toolkit unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen". Wir möchten daran erinnern, dass für die Anwendung von RDA im deutschsprachigen Raum jeweils der deutsche Text maßgeblich ist. Im Juni 2018 wird das RDA Toolkit einen Relaunch erfahren und mit einer neuen Oberfläche erscheinen. Dieser beinhaltet ein Redesign der Toolkit-Oberfläche und die inhaltliche Anpassung des Standards RDA an das Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM) sowie die künftige stärkere Ausrichtung auf die aktuellen technischen Möglichkeiten durch den sogenannten 4-Fold-Path. Zunächst wird im Juni 2018 die englische Originalausgabe der RDA in der neuen Form erscheinen. Alle Übersetzungen werden in einer Übergangszeit angepasst. Hierfür wird die alte Version des RDA Toolkit für ein weiteres Jahr zur Verfügung gestellt. Der Stand Oktober 2017 der deutschen Ausgabe und die D-A-CH-Anwendungsrichtlinien bleiben bis zur Anpassung eingefroren. Im geplanten Dezember-Release des RDA Toolkit wird es keine Änderungen für die deutsche Ausgabe und die D-A-CH-Anwendungsrichtlinien geben. [Inetbib vom 11.10.2017]
    Content
    Vgl. auch: http://www.aspb.de/de/rda/.
  19. Parka, A.L.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: ¬The path to an RDA hybridized catalog : lessons from the Kent State University Libraries' RDA enrichment project (2016) 0.02 
    0.019647349 = product of:
  0.029471021 = sum of:
    0.008046483 = weight(_text_:a in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008046483 = score(doc=2632,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article describes in detail the library implementation of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) Enrichment project. The library "hybridized," or enriched legacy data from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules bibliographic records by the addition of specific RDA elements. The project also cleaned up various other elements in the bibliographic data that were not directly RDA-related. There were over 28 million changes and edits made to these records, changes that would never have been made otherwise because the library lacked the resources to do them independently. The enrichment project made the bibliographic data consistent, and helped prepared the data for its eventual transition to a linked data environment.
    Date
    21. 1.2016 19:08:22
    Type
    a
  20. Bourdenet, P.: ¬The catalog resisting the Web : an historical perspective (2012) 0.02 
    0.01919663 = product of:
  0.028794944 = sum of:
    0.005747488 = weight(_text_:a in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005747488 = score(doc=324,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
    0.023047457 = product of:
      0.046094913 = sum of:
        0.046094913 = weight(_text_:de in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046094913 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Libraries are currently seeking to restructure their services and develop new cataloguing standards to position themselves on the web, which has become the main source of information and documents. The current upheaval within the profession is accompanied by the belief that libraries have a major role to play in identifying and supplying content due to their extensive high quality databases, which remain untapped despite efforts to increase catalog performance. They continue to rely on a strategy that has been proven successful since the mid-nineteenth century while seeking other models for their data. Today, they aim to exploit changes brought about by the web to improve content identification. The current intense debate on RDA implementation mirrors this desire for change. The debate is rooted in past efforts and yet tries to incite radical changes as it provides for interoperability from the creation of records through an object modeling in line with web standards and innovations. These innovations are presented through an historical perspective inspired by writings by librarians who are entrusted with helping in the development of bibliographic description standards.
    Content
    Beitrag aus: Selected Papers from the 8th ISKO-France Conference, 27-28 June 2011, Lille, Université Charles-De-Gaulle Lille 3. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_4_e.pdf.
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 294
  • d 65
  • i 5
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 331
  • el 67
  • m 20
  • n 8
  • b 4
  • ag 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications