Search (462 results, page 1 of 24)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.09
    0.08535436 = product of:
      0.12803154 = sum of:
        0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053093014 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
        0.12272224 = sum of:
          0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07375186 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045180224 = queryNorm
              0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048970375 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045180224 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Type
    a
  2. Chevallet, J.-P.; Bruandet, M.F.: Impact de l'utilisation de multi terms sur la qualité des résponses dùn système de recherche d'information a indexation automatique (1999) 0.07
    0.07004869 = product of:
      0.10507303 = sum of:
        0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 6253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075084865 = score(doc=6253,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6253, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6253)
        0.09756454 = product of:
          0.19512908 = sum of:
            0.19512908 = weight(_text_:de in 6253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19512908 = score(doc=6253,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                1.0049833 = fieldWeight in 6253, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6253)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Imprint
    Lille : Université Charles-de-Gaulle
    Source
    Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al
    Type
    a
  3. Hofstede, M.: Literatuur over onderwerpen zoeken in de OPC (1994) 0.06
    0.056246977 = product of:
      0.084370464 = sum of:
        0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010618603 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
        0.07375186 = product of:
          0.14750372 = sum of:
            0.14750372 = weight(_text_:de in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14750372 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.75969595 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Donkersloot, H.B.: Zoeken op titelwoorden : een oderzoek met de on-line publiekscatalogus (1985) 0.06
    0.056246977 = product of:
      0.084370464 = sum of:
        0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 6204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010618603 = score(doc=6204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6204)
        0.07375186 = product of:
          0.14750372 = sum of:
            0.14750372 = weight(_text_:de in 6204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14750372 = score(doc=6204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.75969595 = fieldWeight in 6204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Ongering, H.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: ¬De ontsluiting in het ADION-systeem : precision en recall (1989) 0.06
    0.056246977 = product of:
      0.084370464 = sum of:
        0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010618603 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
        0.07375186 = product of:
          0.14750372 = sum of:
            0.14750372 = weight(_text_:de in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14750372 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.75969595 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Munoz, A.M.; Munoz, F.A.: Nuevas areas de conocimiento y la problematica documental : la prospectiva de la paz en la Universidad de Granada (1997) 0.06
    0.05502528 = product of:
      0.08253792 = sum of:
        0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010387965 = score(doc=340,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
        0.072149955 = product of:
          0.14429991 = sum of:
            0.14429991 = weight(_text_:de in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14429991 = score(doc=340,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.7431952 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Report of a study from the user's point of view, investigating the facility with which bibliographical material can be identified in a multidisciplinary field, the prospective for peace, from the University's resources. Searches (uniterm and relational) were effected using all available tools - OPACs, CD-ROM collections, online databases, manual catalogues, the Internet - both on the University's system and on national research institutions. Overall results returned a low rate of pertinence (1,86%). This is due not to lack of user search expertise but the lack of subject specific indexing coupled with using a MARC format
    Source
    Boletin de la Asociacion Andaluza de Bibliotecarios. 13(1997) no.50, S.9-21
    Type
    a
  7. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.04
    0.037325956 = product of:
      0.05598893 = sum of:
        0.013139851 = weight(_text_:a in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013139851 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.04284908 = product of:
          0.08569816 = sum of:
            0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08569816 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
    Type
    a
  8. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.03
    0.034760237 = product of:
      0.052140355 = sum of:
        0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009291277 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
        0.04284908 = product of:
          0.08569816 = sum of:
            0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08569816 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
    Type
    a
  9. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.03
    0.034760237 = product of:
      0.052140355 = sum of:
        0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009291277 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
        0.04284908 = product of:
          0.08569816 = sum of:
            0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08569816 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
    Type
    a
  10. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.03
    0.034760237 = product of:
      0.052140355 = sum of:
        0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009291277 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
        0.04284908 = product of:
          0.08569816 = sum of:
            0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08569816 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
    Type
    a
  11. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.03
    0.026661396 = product of:
      0.039992094 = sum of:
        0.009385608 = weight(_text_:a in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009385608 = score(doc=2417,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
        0.030606484 = product of:
          0.061212968 = sum of:
            0.061212968 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061212968 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
    Type
    a
  12. Colace, F.; Santo, M. de; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Improving relevance feedback-based query expansion by the use of a weighted word pairs approach (2015) 0.03
    0.02546151 = product of:
      0.038192265 = sum of:
        0.010535319 = weight(_text_:a in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010535319 = score(doc=2263,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
        0.027656946 = product of:
          0.055313893 = sum of:
            0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055313893 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the use of a new term extraction method for query expansion (QE) in text retrieval is investigated. The new method expands the initial query with a structured representation made of weighted word pairs (WWP) extracted from a set of training documents (relevance feedback). Standard text retrieval systems can handle a WWP structure through custom Boolean weighted models. We experimented with both the explicit and pseudorelevance feedback schemas and compared the proposed term extraction method with others in the literature, such as KLD and RM3. Evaluations have been conducted on a number of test collections (Text REtrivel Conference [TREC]-6, -7, -8, -9, and -10). Results demonstrated that the QE method based on this new structure outperforms the baseline.
    Type
    a
  13. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.02
    0.024993513 = product of:
      0.037490267 = sum of:
        0.01300508 = weight(_text_:a in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01300508 = score(doc=5002,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Many retrievalexperiments are intended to discover ways of improving performance, taking the results obtained with some particular technique as a baseline. The fact that substantial alterations to a system often have little or no effect on particular collections is puzzling. This may be due to the initially poor seperation of relevant and non-relevant documents. The paper presents a procedure for characterizing this seperation for a collection, which can be used to show whether proposed modifications of the base system are likely to be useful.
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
    Type
    a
  14. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.02482874 = product of:
      0.03724311 = sum of:
        0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066366266 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
        0.030606484 = product of:
          0.061212968 = sum of:
            0.061212968 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061212968 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
    Type
    a
  15. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.02482874 = product of:
      0.03724311 = sum of:
        0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066366266 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
        0.030606484 = product of:
          0.061212968 = sum of:
            0.061212968 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061212968 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
    Type
    a
  16. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.02
    0.022477165 = product of:
      0.033715747 = sum of:
        0.012291206 = weight(_text_:a in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012291206 = score(doc=2718,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
        0.02142454 = product of:
          0.04284908 = sum of:
            0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04284908 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A study of the number of irrelevant documents retrieved in a co-ordinate indexing system that does not employ eitherr roles or links. These tests were based on one hundred actual inquiries received in the library and therefore an evaluation of recall efficiency is not included. Over half the enquiries produced no noise, but the mean average percentage niose figure was approximately 33 per cent based on a total average retireval figure of eighteen documents per search. Details of the size of the indexed collection, methods of indexing, and an analysis of the reasons for the retrieval of irrelevant documents are discussed, thereby providing information officers who are thinking of installing such a system with some evidence on which to base a decision as to whether or not to utilize these devices
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
    Type
    a
  17. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.02
    0.022454113 = product of:
      0.03368117 = sum of:
        0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009195981 = score(doc=3572,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes of 3 searches on the topic of virtual communities done on the WWW using HotBot and traditional databases using LEXIS-NEXIS and ABI/Inform. Concludes that the WWW is a good starting place for a broad concept search but the traditional services are better for more precise topics
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
    Type
    a
  18. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.02
    0.022454113 = product of:
      0.03368117 = sum of:
        0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009195981 = score(doc=261,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
        0.024485188 = product of:
          0.048970375 = sum of:
            0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048970375 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Type
    a
  19. López-Pujalte, C.; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya-Anegón, F. de: Order-based fitness functions for genetic algorithms applied to relevance feedback (2003) 0.02
    0.0220016 = product of:
      0.0330024 = sum of:
        0.0099549405 = weight(_text_:a in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0099549405 = score(doc=5154,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
        0.023047457 = product of:
          0.046094913 = sum of:
            0.046094913 = weight(_text_:de in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046094913 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Lopez-Pujalte and Guerrero-Bote test a relevance feedback genetic algorithm while varying its order based fitness functions and generating a function based upon the Ide dec-hi method as a base line. Using the non-zero weighted term types assigned to the query, and to the initially retrieved set of documents, as genes, a chromosome of equal length is created for each. The algorithm is provided with the chromosomes for judged relevant documents, for judged irrelevant documents, and for the irrelevant documents with their terms negated. The algorithm uses random selection of all possible genes, but gives greater likelihood to those with higher fitness values. When the fittest chromosome of a previous population is eliminated it is restored while the least fittest of the new population is eliminated in its stead. A crossover probability of .8 and a mutation probability of .2 were used with 20 generations. Three fitness functions were utilized; the Horng and Yeh function which takes into account the position of relevant documents, and two new functions, one based on accumulating the cosine similarity for retrieved documents, the other on stored fixed-recall-interval precessions. The Cranfield collection was used with the first 15 documents retrieved from 33 queries chosen to have at least 3 relevant documents in the first 15 and at least 5 relevant documents not initially retrieved. Precision was calculated at fixed recall levels using the residual collection method which removes viewed documents. One of the three functions improved the original retrieval by127 percent, while the Ide dec-hi method provided a 120 percent improvement.
    Type
    a
  20. Wildemuth, B.M.; Jacob, E.K.; Fullington, A.;; Bliek, R. de; Friedman, C.P.: ¬A detailed analysis of end-user search behaviours (1991) 0.02
    0.021217927 = product of:
      0.03182689 = sum of:
        0.008779433 = weight(_text_:a in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008779433 = score(doc=2423,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
        0.023047457 = product of:
          0.046094913 = sum of:
            0.046094913 = weight(_text_:de in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046094913 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045180224 = queryNorm
                0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Search statements in this revision process can be viewed as a 'move' in the overall search strategy. Very little is known about how end users develop and revise their search strategies. A study was conducted to analyse the moves made in 244 data base searches conducted by 26 medical students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Students search INQUIRER, a data base of facts and concepts in microbiology. The searches were conducted during a 3-week period in spring 1990 and were recorded by the INQUIRER system. Each search statement was categorised, using Fidel's online searching moves (S. Online review 9(1985) S.61-74) and Bates' search tactics (s. JASIS 30(1979) S.205-214). Further analyses indicated that the most common moves were Browse/Specity, Select Exhaust, Intersect, and Vary, and that selection of moves varied by student and by problem. Analysis of search tactics (combinations of moves) identified 5 common search approaches. The results of this study have implcations for future research on search behaviours, for thedesign of system interfaces and data base structures, and for the training of end users
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 443
  • el 9
  • s 9
  • r 5
  • m 4
  • p 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…