-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.06
0.05575342 = product of:
0.08363013 = sum of:
0.07175817 = product of:
0.2870327 = sum of:
0.2870327 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2870327 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38303843 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01187196 = weight(_text_:a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01187196 = score(doc=230,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
- Type
- a
-
Panzer, M.: Designing identifiers for the DDC (2007)
0.05
0.051749222 = product of:
0.07762383 = sum of:
0.00890397 = weight(_text_:a in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00890397 = score(doc=1752,freq=40.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
0.06871986 = sum of:
0.027656946 = weight(_text_:de in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027656946 = score(doc=1752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.14244299 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
0.04106291 = weight(_text_:22 in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04106291 = score(doc=1752,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2595412 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- "Although the Dewey Decimal Classification is currently available on the web to subscribers as WebDewey and Abridged WebDewey in the OCLC Connexion service and in an XML version to licensees, OCLC does not provide any "web services" based on the DDC. By web services, we mean presentation of the DDC to other machines (not humans) for uses such as searching, browsing, classifying, mapping, harvesting, and alerting. In order to build web-accessible services based on the DDC, several elements have to be considered. One of these elements is the design of an appropriate Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) structure for Dewey. The design goals of mapping the entity model of the DDC into an identifier space can be summarized as follows: * Common locator for Dewey concepts and associated resources for use in web services and web applications * Use-case-driven, but not directly related to and outlasting a specific use case (persistency) * Retraceable path to a concept rather than an abstract identification, reusing a means of identification that is already present in the DDC and available in existing metadata. We have been working closely with our colleagues in the OCLC Office of Research (especially Andy Houghton as well as Eric Childress, Diane Vizine-Goetz, and Stu Weibel) on a preliminary identifier syntax. The basic identifier format we are currently exploring is: http://dewey.info/{aspect}/{object}/{locale}/{type}/{version}/{resource} where * {aspect} is the aspect associated with an {object}-the current value set of aspect contains "concept", "scheme", and "index"; additional ones are under exploration * {object} is a type of {aspect} * {locale} identifies a Dewey translation * {type} identifies a Dewey edition type and contains, at a minimum, the values "edn" for the full edition or "abr" for the abridged edition * {version} identifies a Dewey edition version * {resource} identifies a resource associated with an {object} in the context of {locale}, {type}, and {version}
Some examples of identifiers for concepts follow: <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/en/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the English-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/de/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the German-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 333.7-333.9 concept across all editions and language versions. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/about.skos> This identifier is used to retrieve a SKOS representation of the 333.7-333.9 concept (using the "resource" element). There are several open issues at this preliminary stage of development: Use cases: URIs need to represent the range of statements or questions that could be submitted to a Dewey web service. Therefore, it seems that some general questions have to be answered first: What information does an agent have when coming to a Dewey web service? What kind of questions will such an agent ask? Placement of the {locale} component: It is still an open question if the {locale} component should be placed after the {version} component instead (<http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/edn/22/en>) to emphasize that the most important instantiation of a Dewey class is its edition, not its language version. From a services point of view, however, it could make more sense to keep the current arrangement, because users are more likely to come to the service with a present understanding of the language version they are seeking without knowing the specifics of a certain edition in which they are trying to find topics. Identification of other Dewey entities: The goal is to create a locator that does not answer all, but a lot of questions that could be asked about the DDC. Which entities are missing but should be surfaced for services or user agents? How will those services or agents interact with them? Should some entities be rendered in a different way as presented? For example, (how) should the DDC Summaries be retrievable? Would it be necessary to make the DDC Manual accessible through this identifier structure?"
-
Mas, S.; Zaher, L'H.; Zacklad, M.: Design & evaluation of multi-viewed knowledge system for administrative electronic document organization (2008)
0.05
0.04965973 = product of:
0.07448959 = sum of:
0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010618603 = score(doc=2480,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
0.06387099 = product of:
0.12774198 = sum of:
0.12774198 = weight(_text_:de in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12774198 = score(doc=2480,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.657916 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This communication describes part of a current research carried out at the Université de Technologie de Troyes and funded by a postdoctoral grant from the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture. Under the title "Design and evaluation of a faceted classification for uniform and personal organization of administrative electronic documents", our research investigates the feasibility of creating a faceted and multi-points-of-view classification scheme for administrative document organization and retrieval in online environments.
-
Lambotte, A.-C.: Dewey en France (2007)
0.04
0.042185232 = product of:
0.06327785 = sum of:
0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007963953 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.055313893 = product of:
0.110627785 = sum of:
0.110627785 = weight(_text_:de in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110627785 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.56977195 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- http://www.nb.admin.ch/slb/slb_professionnel/projektarbeit/00729/01615/01675/index.html?lang=de
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.04
0.040907413 = product of:
0.12272224 = sum of:
0.12272224 = sum of:
0.07375186 = weight(_text_:de in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07375186 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
- Editor
- Carroll, J.J. u. J. de Roo
-
Chernobyl : ten years after (1996)
0.04
0.03977262 = product of:
0.059658926 = sum of:
0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 7857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075084865 = score(doc=7857,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7857, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7857)
0.05215044 = product of:
0.10430088 = sum of:
0.10430088 = weight(_text_:de in 7857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10430088 = score(doc=7857,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 7857, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The 3 institutes have summarised the current knowledge about the course of the accident of Chernobyl, its causes and consequences. The CD contains a survey of the situation at the Chernobyl site and explains the functioning and the safety features of the RBMK-type reactors that are still being operated there. The CD also contains a set of hitherto unpublished photographic material of the RRC KI, most of it taken at the Chernobyl site shortly after the accident
- Editor
- Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit; Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire; Russian Research Centre 'Kurchatov Institute' (RRC KI)
-
Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999)
0.04
0.037325956 = product of:
0.05598893 = sum of:
0.013139851 = weight(_text_:a in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013139851 = score(doc=6021,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.04284908 = product of:
0.08569816 = sum of:
0.08569816 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08569816 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Ariadne. 1999, no.22
- Type
- a
-
Lavoie, B.; Connaway, L.S.; Dempsey, L.: Anatomy of aggregate collections : the example of Google print for libraries (2005)
0.04
0.035821266 = product of:
0.0537319 = sum of:
0.007711064 = weight(_text_:a in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007711064 = score(doc=1184,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.1480195 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.046020836 = sum of:
0.027656946 = weight(_text_:de in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027656946 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.14244299 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.01836389 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01836389 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Google's December 2004 announcement of its intention to collaborate with five major research libraries - Harvard University, the University of Michigan, Stanford University, the University of Oxford, and the New York Public Library - to digitize and surface their print book collections in the Google searching universe has, predictably, stirred conflicting opinion, with some viewing the project as a welcome opportunity to enhance the visibility of library collections in new environments, and others wary of Google's prospective role as gateway to these collections. The project has been vigorously debated on discussion lists and blogs, with the participating libraries commonly referred to as "the Google 5". One point most observers seem to concede is that the questions raised by this initiative are both timely and significant. The Google Print Library Project (GPLP) has galvanized a long overdue, multi-faceted discussion about library print book collections. The print book is core to library identity and practice, but in an era of zero-sum budgeting, it is almost inevitable that print book budgets will decline as budgets for serials, digital resources, and other materials expand. As libraries re-allocate resources to accommodate changing patterns of user needs, print book budgets may be adversely impacted. Of course, the degree of impact will depend on a library's perceived mission. A public library may expect books to justify their shelf-space, with de-accession the consequence of minimal use. A national library, on the other hand, has a responsibility to the scholarly and cultural record and may seek to collect comprehensively within particular areas, with the attendant obligation to secure the long-term retention of its print book collections. The combination of limited budgets, changing user needs, and differences in library collection strategies underscores the need to think about a collective, or system-wide, print book collection - in particular, how can an inter-institutional system be organized to achieve goals that would be difficult, and/or prohibitively expensive, for any one library to undertake individually [4]? Mass digitization programs like GPLP cast new light on these and other issues surrounding the future of library print book collections, but at this early stage, it is light that illuminates only dimly. It will be some time before GPLP's implications for libraries and library print book collections can be fully appreciated and evaluated. But the strong interest and lively debate generated by this initiative suggest that some preliminary analysis - premature though it may be - would be useful, if only to undertake a rough mapping of the terrain over which GPLP potentially will extend. At the least, some early perspective helps shape interesting questions for the future, when the boundaries of GPLP become settled, workflows for producing and managing the digitized materials become systematized, and usage patterns within the GPLP framework begin to emerge.
This article offers some perspectives on GPLP in light of what is known about library print book collections in general, and those of the Google 5 in particular, from information in OCLC's WorldCat bibliographic database and holdings file. Questions addressed include: * Coverage: What proportion of the system-wide print book collection will GPLP potentially cover? What is the degree of holdings overlap across the print book collections of the five participating libraries? * Language: What is the distribution of languages associated with the print books held by the GPLP libraries? Which languages are predominant? * Copyright: What proportion of the GPLP libraries' print book holdings are out of copyright? * Works: How many distinct works are represented in the holdings of the GPLP libraries? How does a focus on works impact coverage and holdings overlap? * Convergence: What are the effects on coverage of using a different set of five libraries? What are the effects of adding the holdings of additional libraries to those of the GPLP libraries, and how do these effects vary by library type? These questions certainly do not exhaust the analytical possibilities presented by GPLP. More in-depth analysis might look at Google 5 coverage in particular subject areas; it also would be interesting to see how many books covered by the GPLP have already been digitized in other contexts. However, these questions are left to future studies. The purpose here is to explore a few basic questions raised by GPLP, and in doing so, provide an empirical context for the debate that is sure to continue for some time to come. A secondary objective is to lay some groundwork for a general set of questions that could be used to explore the implications of any mass digitization initiative. A suggested list of questions is provided in the conclusion of the article.
- Date
- 26.12.2011 14:08:22
- Type
- a
-
XFML Core - eXchangeable Faceted Metadata Language (2003)
0.04
0.03515436 = product of:
0.05273154 = sum of:
0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066366266 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
0.046094913 = product of:
0.092189826 = sum of:
0.092189826 = weight(_text_:de in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092189826 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.47480997 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The specification for XFML, a markup language designed to handle faceted classifications. Browsing the site (http://www.xfml.org/) will reveal news about XFML and links to related software and web sites. XFML is not an officially recognized Internet standard, but is the de facto standard.
-
Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003)
0.04
0.03503491 = product of:
0.052552365 = sum of:
0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046456386 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.047906727 = product of:
0.09581345 = sum of:
0.09581345 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09581345 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
- Object
- DDC-22
-
Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007)
0.03
0.034801044 = product of:
0.05220156 = sum of:
0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065699257 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
0.045631636 = product of:
0.09126327 = sum of:
0.09126327 = weight(_text_:de in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09126327 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- KoT (Kinds of Tags) is an ongoing joint collaborative research effort with many participants worldwide, including the University of Minho, UKOLN, the University of Bologna, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and La Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. It is focused on the analysis of tags that are in common use in the practice of social tagging, with the aim of discovering how easily tags can be 'normalised' for interoperability with standard metadata environments such as the DC Metadata Terms.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.03
0.033280488 = product of:
0.04992073 = sum of:
0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066366266 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.043284103 = product of:
0.08656821 = sum of:
0.08656821 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08656821 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Type
- a
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.03
0.031993672 = product of:
0.04799051 = sum of:
0.011262729 = weight(_text_:a in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011262729 = score(doc=3895,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.03672778 = product of:
0.07345556 = sum of:
0.07345556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07345556 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
- Type
- a
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.03
0.02989924 = product of:
0.08969772 = sum of:
0.08969772 = product of:
0.35879087 = sum of:
0.35879087 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35879087 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38303843 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Networked Knowledge Organisation Systems and Services - TPDL 2011 : The 10th European Networked Knowledge Organisation Systems (NKOS) Workshop (2011)
0.03
0.029829463 = product of:
0.044744194 = sum of:
0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 6033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0056313644 = score(doc=6033,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 6033, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6033)
0.03911283 = product of:
0.07822566 = sum of:
0.07822566 = weight(_text_:de in 6033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07822566 = score(doc=6033,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 6033, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Programm mit Links auf die Präsentationen: Armando Stellato, Ahsan Morshed, Gudrun Johannsen, Yves Jacques, Caterina Caracciolo, Sachit Rajbhandari, Imma Subirats, Johannes Keizer: A Collaborative Framework for Managing and Publishing KOS - Christian Mader, Bernhard Haslhofer: Quality Criteria for Controlled Web Vocabularies - Ahsan Morshed, Benjamin Zapilko, Gudrun Johannsen, Philipp Mayr, Johannes Keizer: Evaluating approaches to automatically match thesauri from different domains for Linked Open Data - Johan De Smedt: SKOS extensions to cover mapping requirements - Mark Tomko: Translating biological data sets Into Linked Data - Daniel Kless: Ontologies and thesauri - similarities and differences - Antoine Isaac, Jacco van Ossenbruggen: Europeana and semantic alignment of vocabularies - Douglas Tudhope: Complementary use of ontologies and (other) KOS - Wilko van Hoek, Brigitte Mathiak, Philipp Mayr, Sascha Schüller: Comparing the accuracy of the semantic similarity provided by the Normalized Google Distance (NGD) and the Search Term Recommender (STR) - Denise Bedford: Selecting and Weighting Semantically Discovered Concepts as Social Tags - Stella Dextre Clarke, Johan De Smedt. ISO 25964-1: a new standard for development of thesauri and exchange of thesaurus data
-
Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996)
0.03
0.029794488 = product of:
0.04469173 = sum of:
0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007963953 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.03672778 = product of:
0.07345556 = sum of:
0.07345556 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07345556 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
- Date
- 10.11.1996 16:36:22
-
Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009)
0.03
0.029794488 = product of:
0.04469173 = sum of:
0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007963953 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.03672778 = product of:
0.07345556 = sum of:
0.07345556 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07345556 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 1. 3.2013 14:56:22
-
Isaac, A.: After EDLproject : controlled Vocabularies in TELPlus (2007)
0.03
0.029794488 = product of:
0.04469173 = sum of:
0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007963953 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.03672778 = product of:
0.07345556 = sum of:
0.07345556 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07345556 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Schreiber, G.; Amin, A.; Assem, M. van; Boer, V. de; Hardman, L.; Hildebrand, M.; Hollink, L.; Huang, Z.; Kersen, J. van; Niet, M. de; Omelayenko, B.; Ossenbruggen, J. van; Siebes, R.; Taekema, J.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: MultimediaN E-Culture demonstrator (2006)
0.03
0.02872987 = product of:
0.043094806 = sum of:
0.0039819763 = weight(_text_:a in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039819763 = score(doc=4648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
0.03911283 = product of:
0.07822566 = sum of:
0.07822566 = weight(_text_:de in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07822566 = score(doc=4648,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.4028896 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Collard, J.; Paiva, V. de; Fong, B.; Subrahmanian, E.: Extracting mathematical concepts from text (2022)
0.03
0.02843627 = product of:
0.042654403 = sum of:
0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010387965 = score(doc=668,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.032266438 = product of:
0.064532876 = sum of:
0.064532876 = weight(_text_:de in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064532876 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- We investigate different systems for extracting mathematical entities from English texts in the mathematical field of category theory as a first step for constructing a mathematical knowledge graph. We consider four different term extractors and compare their results. This small experiment showcases some of the issues with the construction and evaluation of terms extracted from noisy domain text. We also make available two open corpora in research mathematics, in particular in category theory: a small corpus of 755 abstracts from the journal TAC (3188 sentences), and a larger corpus from the nLab community wiki (15,000 sentences).
- Type
- a
