-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.02
0.023402527 = product of:
0.03510379 = sum of:
0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010618603 = score(doc=5830,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.024485188 = product of:
0.048970375 = sum of:
0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048970375 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examnines various isues that arise in establishing a theoretical basis for an experimental fiction analysis system. It analyzes the warrants of fiction and of works about fiction. From this analysis, it derives classificatory requirements for a fiction system. Classificatory techniques that may contribute to the specification of data elements in fiction are suggested
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: Within, among, between : three faces of interdisciplinarity (1996)
0.00
0.0030970925 = product of:
0.009291277 = sum of:
0.009291277 = weight(_text_:a in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009291277 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: Within, among, between : three faces of interdisciplinarity (1995)
0.00
0.002682161 = product of:
0.008046483 = sum of:
0.008046483 = weight(_text_:a in 1297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008046483 = score(doc=1297,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1297, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1297)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Interdisciplinarity is a means by which the unit of information and the separateness of disciplines can work together harmoniously. Characterizes disciplinarity and the role of information science in serving other disciplines as well as its own discipline. Interdisciplinarity relationships occur among all knowledge seeking disciplines, (including LIS), and those between LIS and every other filed of knowledge production, utilization and practical action. Considers how LIS can promote interdisciplinarity relationships and research
- Source
- Connectedness: information, systems, people, organizations. Proceedings of CAIS/ACSI 95, the proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science. Ed. by Hope A. Olson and Denis B. Ward
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: Professional values and ethics in knowledge organization and cataloguing : observations on standards and implementation (1998)
0.00
0.002654651 = product of:
0.007963953 = sum of:
0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007963953 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: ¬L'¬efficacia del recupero (1993)
0.00
0.0025028288 = product of:
0.0075084865 = sum of:
0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 4018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075084865 = score(doc=4018,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4018, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4018)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Proposes a new experimental methodology for evaluating the results of library research from the user's viewpoint. Illustrates the theory by comparing the efficacy of information retrieved from 2 document catalogues, identical except that one is alphabetical and the other numerical/verbal. The methodology utilises the concept of 3 dependent variables: 'promising references retrieved' by the researcher; 'documents read'; and 'documents cited'. Claims that the retrieval effectiveness of the techniques outlined compares favourably with that of W.S. Cooper's methodology
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus : the case of fiction studies (1995)
0.00
0.0022989952 = product of:
0.006896985 = sum of:
0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 7728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006896985 = score(doc=7728,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 7728, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7728)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article reports research that used descriptor subfields in MLA Bibliography online to quantify literary warrant in the domain of scholarly work about fiction (i.e., 'fiction studies'). The research used Hulme's concept of literary warrant and Kernan's description of the interactive processes of literature and literary scholarship to justify quantifying existing subject indexing in existing bibliographic records as a first step in the domain analysis of a field. It was found that certain of the MLA Bibliography onle's descriptor subfields and certain of the descriptor terms within those subfields occured more often than would occur by chance. The techniques used in the research might be extended to domain analysis of other fields. Use of the methodology might improve the ability to evaluate existing and to design future subject access systems
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: 'Facets' as interdisciplinary undiscovered public knowledge : S.R. Ranganathan in India and L. Guttman in Israel (1995)
0.00
0.0022989952 = product of:
0.006896985 = sum of:
0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 2217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006896985 = score(doc=2217,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2217, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2217)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Undiscovered public knowledge is a relatively unstudied phenomenon, and the few extended examples that have been published are intradisciplinary. This paper presents the concept of 'facet' as an example of interdisciplinary undiscovered public knowledge. 'Facets' were central to the bibliographic classification theory of S.R. Ranganathan in India and to the behavioural research of L. Guttman in Israel. The term had the same meaning in both fields, and the concept was developed and exploited at about the same time in both, but two separate, unconnected literatures grew up around the term and its associated concepts. This paper examines the origins and parallel uses of the concept and the term in both fields as a case study of interdisciplinary knowledge that could have been, but was apparantly not, doscovered any time between the aerly 1950s and the present using simple, readily available information retrieval techniques
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994)
0.00
0.0021899752 = product of:
0.0065699257 = sum of:
0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065699257 = score(doc=3413,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The work is an adaptation of the author's dissertation and has the following chapters: (1) background and introduction; (2) a problem in classification theory; (3) previous fiction analysis theories and systems and 'The left hand of darkness'; (4) fiction warrant and critical warrant; (5) experimental fiction analysis system (EFAS); (6) application and evaluation of EFAS. Appendix 1 gives references to fiction analysis systems and appendix 2 lists EFAS coding sheets
-
Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998)
0.00
0.0018771215 = product of:
0.0056313644 = sum of:
0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0056313644 = score(doc=2028,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic classification systems purport to organize the world of knowledge for information storage and retrieval purposes in libraries and bibliographies, both manual and online. The major systems that have predominated during the 20th century were originally predicated on the academic disciplines. This structural principle is no longer adequate because multidisciplinray knowledge production has overtaken more traditional disciplinary perspectives and produced communities of cooperation whose documents cannot be accomodated in a disciplinary structure. This paper addresses the problems the major classifications face, reports some attempts to revise these systems to accomodate multidisciplinary works more appropriately, and describes some theoretical research perspectives that attempt to reorient classification research toward the pluralistic needs of multidisciplinary knowledge creation and the perspectives of different discourse communities. Traditionally, the primary desiderata of classification systems were mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity. The need to respond to multidisciplinary research may mean that hospitality will replace mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity as the most needed and useful characteristics of classification systems in both theory and practice
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: General classification systems : structural principles for multidisciplinary specification (1998)
0.00
0.0018771215 = product of:
0.0056313644 = sum of:
0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0056313644 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this century, knowledge creation, production, dissemination and use have changed profoundly. Intellectual and physical barriers have been substantially reduced by the rise of multidisciplinarity and by the influence of computerization, particularly by the spread of the World Wide Web (WWW). Bibliographic classification systems need to respond to this situation. Three possible strategic responses are described: 1) adopting an existing system; 2) adapting an existing system; and 3) finding new structural principles for classification systems. Examples of these three responses are given. An extended example of the third option uses the knowledge outline in the Spectrum of Britannica Online to suggest a theory of "viewpoint warrant" that could be used to incorporate differing perspectives into general classification systems
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: 'Itself an education' classification systems, theory, and research in the information studies curriculum (1997)
0.00
0.0015485462 = product of:
0.0046456386 = sum of:
0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046456386 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: Stories : applications of narrative discourse analysis to issues in information storage and retrieval (1997)
0.00
0.0015485462 = product of:
0.0046456386 = sum of:
0.0046456386 = weight(_text_:a in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046456386 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045180224 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Type
- a
