Marchese, C.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Boundary objects: CWA, an HR Firm, and emergent vocabulary (2013)
0.00
0.0023678814 = product of:
0.0047357627 = sum of:
0.0047357627 = product of:
0.009471525 = sum of:
0.009471525 = weight(_text_:a in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009471525 = score(doc=1066,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization structures are dependent upon domain-analytical processes for determining ontological imperatives. Boundary objects-terms used in multiple domains but understood differently in each-are ontological clash points. Cognitive Work Analysis is an effective qualitative methodology for domain analysis of a group of people who work together. CWA was used recently to understand the ontology of a human resources firm. Boundary objects from the taxonomy that emerged from narrative analysis are presented here for individual analysis.
- Footnote
- Part of a section: "Papers from the Fourth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, sponsored by ISKO-Canada, United States, 13-14 June, 2013, Milwaukee, Wisconsin"
- Type
- a
