-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.04
0.03894684 = product of:
0.05842026 = sum of:
0.009442515 = weight(_text_:s in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009442515 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.048977744 = product of:
0.09795549 = sum of:
0.09795549 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09795549 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
- Source
- Mathematical intelligencer. 14(1992), no.4, S.4-5
-
Castro, R. de; Grossmann, J.W.: Famous trails to Paul Erdös (1999)
0.03
0.027735163 = product of:
0.041602742 = sum of:
0.0047212574 = weight(_text_:s in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047212574 = score(doc=3991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.036881484 = product of:
0.07376297 = sum of:
0.07376297 = weight(_text_:de in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07376297 = score(doc=3991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Mathematical intelligencer. 21(1999) no.3, S.51-63
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.024341775 = product of:
0.03651266 = sum of:
0.0059015723 = weight(_text_:s in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0059015723 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.03061109 = product of:
0.06122218 = sum of:
0.06122218 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06122218 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.02
0.024019353 = product of:
0.03602903 = sum of:
0.0040887296 = weight(_text_:s in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0040887296 = score(doc=3585,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.0319403 = product of:
0.0638806 = sum of:
0.0638806 = weight(_text_:de in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0638806 = score(doc=3585,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.328958 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
- Pages
- xxxi, 417 S
-
Araújo, P.C. de; Gutierres Castanha, R.C.; Hjoerland, B.: Citation indexing and indexes (2021)
0.02
0.02080137 = product of:
0.031202054 = sum of:
0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035409431 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.027661111 = product of:
0.055322222 = sum of:
0.055322222 = weight(_text_:de in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055322222 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 48(2021) no.1, S.72-101
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.02
0.019676877 = product of:
0.029515315 = sum of:
0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035409431 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.025974372 = product of:
0.051948745 = sum of:
0.051948745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051948745 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.02
0.017039243 = product of:
0.025558863 = sum of:
0.0041311 = weight(_text_:s in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041311 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.021427764 = product of:
0.042855527 = sum of:
0.042855527 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042855527 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.02
0.017039243 = product of:
0.025558863 = sum of:
0.0041311 = weight(_text_:s in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041311 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.021427764 = product of:
0.042855527 = sum of:
0.042855527 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042855527 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.330-341
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.016325915 = product of:
0.048977744 = sum of:
0.048977744 = product of:
0.09795549 = sum of:
0.09795549 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09795549 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.02
0.01558287 = product of:
0.023374304 = sum of:
0.0050076502 = weight(_text_:s in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050076502 = score(doc=3692,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.431-435
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.02
0.01558287 = product of:
0.023374304 = sum of:
0.0050076502 = weight(_text_:s in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050076502 = score(doc=590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.014605064 = product of:
0.021907596 = sum of:
0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035409431 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.302-310
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.014605064 = product of:
0.021907596 = sum of:
0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035409431 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
- Source
- c't. 2003, H.1, S.38
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.014605064 = product of:
0.021907596 = sum of:
0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035409431 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.014605064 = product of:
0.021907596 = sum of:
0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035409431 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.014605064 = product of:
0.021907596 = sum of:
0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035409431 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.01
0.014605064 = product of:
0.021907596 = sum of:
0.0035409431 = weight(_text_:s in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035409431 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.018366653 = product of:
0.036733307 = sum of:
0.036733307 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036733307 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1820-1833
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.014430206 = product of:
0.04329062 = sum of:
0.04329062 = product of:
0.08658124 = sum of:
0.08658124 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08658124 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15823726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004)
0.01
0.013867581 = product of:
0.020801371 = sum of:
0.0023606287 = weight(_text_:s in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0023606287 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
0.018440742 = product of:
0.036881484 = sum of:
0.036881484 = weight(_text_:de in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036881484 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.18992399 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Die Szientometrie beschäftigt sich mit der Messbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Leistungen anhand bibliothekarisch nachweisbarer Publikationsergebnisse. Bei genauer Betrachtung ist es ihr Ziel, die Wissenszunahme der Wissenschaft zu messen. Die wissenschaftliche Produktion in Form von Publikationen wächst seit über dreihundert Jahren konstant mit ca. 3,5% pro Jahr. Das entspricht einerVerdopplungsrate von 20 Jahren, die zuerst dem Bibliothekar Fremont Rider 1948 bei Büchern auffiel und die 1963 von Derek J. de Solla Price auch für das Wachstum von Zeitschriften und Bibliografien bestätigt wurde. Die Konstanz dieser Evolution, unabhängig aller sich ereignenden Katastrophen, ist nur zum Teil verstanden, macht aber den unaufhaltsamen Fortschritt der Wissenschaft deutlich. Alle 20 Jahre wird so viel publiziert wie in allen Jahrhunderten davor. Eine etwa gleiche Zunahme verzeichnen die Wissenschaftler, die damit etwa gleich produktiv bleiben. Von ihnen allen sind damit ca. 87% unsere heutigen Zeitgenossen. Aus diesem Wachstum heraus können wir abschätzen, dass in 100.000 laufenden Zeitschriften heute etwa 10 Mio. Publikationen jährlich erscheinen, die von 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern verfasst werden. Dabei definieren sich nur die als Wissenschaftler, die durchschnittlich eine Publikation jährlich verfassen. Die gesamte Produktion an Buchtiteln, die bisher erschien, dürfte bei etwa 100 Mio. liegen. Davon sind etwa 20 Mio. als wissenschaftlich einzustufen. Wenn folglich 87% aller Wissenschaftler noch heute leben, so betrug die Gesamtzahl der Wissenschaftler in der Welt bisher 11,5 Mio., die in ihrem Leben durchschnittlich 1,5 Bücher pro Kopf verfassten, und etwa das 10-20fache an Zeitschriftenbeiträgen leisteten. Ein Teil dieser Bücher sind allerdings Neuauflagen und Übersetzungen. Nach Lotka, A. J. ist die Produktivität der Wissenschaftler eine schiefe Verteilung von der Form A/n**2, wobei A die Zahl der Autoren mit nur einer Publikation ist und n die Publikationen pro Autor. Während Price in seinen "Networks of Scientific Papers" Vergleichswerte von n**2,5 bis n**3 angab, zeigten Untersuchungen am Science Citation Index (SCI), die auf die gesamte naturwissenschaftliche Literatur hochgerechnet wurden, eher einen Wert von n**1,7. Auf die Tatsache, dass eine Verdopplungsrate der Wissenschaftler von 20 Jahren und eine solche der Menschheit von etwa 50 Jahren dazu führt, dass eines Tages alle Menschen Wissenschaftler werden, hat Price bereits 1963 hingewiesen. Dieser Zustand müsste bei 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern und 6 Mrd. Menschen in etwa 300 Jahren eintreten, ein nur scheinbar absurder Gedanke, wenn man bedenkt, dass man sich vor 300 Jahren auch kaum vorstellen konnte, dass alle Menschen Lesen, Schreiben und Rechnen lernen können, und dass wir uns ungebildete Menschen immer weniger leisten können.
- Pages
- S.237-243
-
Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004)
0.01
0.013867581 = product of:
0.020801371 = sum of:
0.0023606287 = weight(_text_:s in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0023606287 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049129035 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
0.018440742 = product of:
0.036881484 = sum of:
0.036881484 = weight(_text_:de in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036881484 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19419076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.045187026 = queryNorm
0.18992399 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.14, S.1250-1260
