Search (60 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  1. Egghe, L.: Mathematical theories of citation (1998) 0.02
    0.015836604 = product of:
      0.031673208 = sum of:
        0.031673208 = product of:
          0.063346416 = sum of:
            0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 5125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063346416 = score(doc=5125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 5125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Egghe, L.: Dynamic h-index : the Hirsch index in function of time (2007) 0.02
    0.015836604 = product of:
      0.031673208 = sum of:
        0.031673208 = product of:
          0.063346416 = sum of:
            0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063346416 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008) 0.02
    0.015836604 = product of:
      0.031673208 = sum of:
        0.031673208 = product of:
          0.063346416 = sum of:
            0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063346416 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Egghe, L.: On the relation between the association strength and other similarity measures (2010) 0.02
    0.015836604 = product of:
      0.031673208 = sum of:
        0.031673208 = product of:
          0.063346416 = sum of:
            0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063346416 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Egghe, L.: Informetric explanation of some Leiden Ranking graphs (2014) 0.02
    0.015836604 = product of:
      0.031673208 = sum of:
        0.031673208 = product of:
          0.063346416 = sum of:
            0.063346416 = weight(_text_:l in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063346416 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Egghe, L.: Mathematical study of h-index sequences (2009) 0.01
    0.013997713 = product of:
      0.027995426 = sum of:
        0.027995426 = product of:
          0.055990852 = sum of:
            0.055990852 = weight(_text_:l in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055990852 = score(doc=4217,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper studies mathematical properties of h-index sequences as developed by Liang [Liang, L. (2006). h-Index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1), 153-159]. For practical reasons, Liming studies such sequences where the time goes backwards while it is more logical to use the time going forward (real career periods). Both type of h-index sequences are studied here and their interrelations are revealed. We show cases where these sequences are convex, linear and concave. We also show that, when one of the sequences is convex then the other one is concave, showing that the reverse-time sequence, in general, cannot be used to derive similar properties of the (difficult to obtain) forward time sequence. We show that both sequences are the same if and only if the author produces the same number of papers per year. If the author produces an increasing number of papers per year, then Liang's h-sequences are above the "normal" ones. All these results are also valid for g- and R-sequences. The results are confirmed by the h-, g- and R-sequences (forward and reverse time) of the author.
  7. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Topological aspects of information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=2157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Let (DS, DQ, sim) be a retrieval system consisting of a document space DS, a query space QS, and a function sim, expressing the similarity between a document and a query. Following D.M. Everett and S.C. Cater (1992), we introduce topologies on the document space. These topologies are generated by the similarity function sim and the query space QS. 3 topologies will be studied: the retrieval topology, the similarity topology and the (pseudo-)metric one. It is shown that the retrieval topology is the coarsest of the three, while the (pseudo-)metric is the strongest. These 3 topologies are generally different, reflecting distinct topological aspects of information retrieval. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for these topological aspects to be equal
  8. Egghe, L.: Sampling and concentration values of incomplete bibliographies (2002) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Egghe, L.: Vector retrieval, fuzzy retrieval and the universal fuzzy IR surface for IR evaluation (2004) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 2531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=2531,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 2531, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2531)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Egghe, L.: ¬The influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index (2008) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Egghe, L.: ¬A rationale for the Hirsch-index rank-order distribution and a comparison with the impact factor rank-order distribution (2009) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 3124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=3124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 3124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Egghe, L.: ¬A new short proof of Naranan's theorem, explaining Lotka's law and Zipf's law (2010) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 3432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=3432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 3432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Egghe, L.: Theory of the topical coverage of multiple databases (2013) 0.01
    0.013857029 = product of:
      0.027714059 = sum of:
        0.027714059 = product of:
          0.055428118 = sum of:
            0.055428118 = weight(_text_:l in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055428118 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.01
    0.011877453 = product of:
      0.023754906 = sum of:
        0.023754906 = product of:
          0.04750981 = sum of:
            0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750981 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization : definitions and relations (2000) 0.01
    0.011877453 = product of:
      0.023754906 = sum of:
        0.023754906 = product of:
          0.04750981 = sum of:
            0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750981 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Egghe, L.: ¬A noninformetric analysis of the relationship between citation age and journal productivity (2001) 0.01
    0.011877453 = product of:
      0.023754906 = sum of:
        0.023754906 = product of:
          0.04750981 = sum of:
            0.04750981 = weight(_text_:l in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04750981 = score(doc=5685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045365814 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)