-
Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016)
0.08
0.0771009 = product of:
0.1542018 = sum of:
0.1542018 = sum of:
0.09291325 = weight(_text_:n in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09291325 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.061288558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061288558 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Lindstrom, N.; Malmsten, M.: Building interfaces on a networked graph (2015)
0.03
0.027873974 = product of:
0.05574795 = sum of:
0.05574795 = product of:
0.1114959 = sum of:
0.1114959 = weight(_text_:n in 2557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1114959 = score(doc=2557,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.57165027 = fieldWeight in 2557, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2557)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Aletras, N.; Baldwin, T.; Lau, J.H.; Stevenson, M.: Evaluating topic representations for exploring document collections (2017)
0.02
0.016424898 = product of:
0.032849796 = sum of:
0.032849796 = product of:
0.06569959 = sum of:
0.06569959 = weight(_text_:n in 3325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06569959 = score(doc=3325,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 3325, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3325)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Topic models have been shown to be a useful way of representing the content of large document collections, for example, via visualization interfaces (topic browsers). These systems enable users to explore collections by way of latent topics. A standard way to represent a topic is using a term list; that is the top-n words with highest conditional probability within the topic. Other topic representations such as textual and image labels also have been proposed. However, there has been no comparison of these alternative representations. In this article, we compare 3 different topic representations in a document retrieval task. Participants were asked to retrieve relevant documents based on predefined queries within a fixed time limit, presenting topics in one of the following modalities: (a) lists of terms, (b) textual phrase labels, and (c) image labels. Results show that textual labels are easier for users to interpret than are term lists and image labels. Moreover, the precision of retrieved documents for textual and image labels is comparable to the precision achieved by representing topics using term lists, demonstrating that labeling methods are an effective alternative topic representation.
-
Maaten, L. van den: Accelerating t-SNE using Tree-Based Algorithms (2014)
0.02
0.016259817 = product of:
0.032519635 = sum of:
0.032519635 = product of:
0.06503927 = sum of:
0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 3886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06503927 = score(doc=3886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 3886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper investigates the acceleration of t-SNE-an embedding technique that is commonly used for the visualization of high-dimensional data in scatter plots-using two tree-based algorithms. In particular, the paper develops variants of the Barnes-Hut algorithm and of the dual-tree algorithm that approximate the gradient used for learning t-SNE embeddings in O(N*logN). Our experiments show that the resulting algorithms substantially accelerate t-SNE, and that they make it possible to learn embeddings of data sets with millions of objects. Somewhat counterintuitively, the Barnes-Hut variant of t-SNE appears to outperform the dual-tree variant.
-
Nehmadi, L.; Meyer, J.; Parmet, Y.; Ben-Asher, N.: Predicting a screen area's perceived importance from spatial and physical attributes (2011)
0.01
0.013936987 = product of:
0.027873974 = sum of:
0.027873974 = product of:
0.05574795 = sum of:
0.05574795 = weight(_text_:n in 4757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05574795 = score(doc=4757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 4757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Su, H.-N.: Visualization of global science and technology policy research structure (2012)
0.01
0.013936987 = product of:
0.027873974 = sum of:
0.027873974 = product of:
0.05574795 = sum of:
0.05574795 = weight(_text_:n in 4969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05574795 = score(doc=4969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 4969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4969)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wu, Y.; Bai, R.: ¬An event relationship model for knowledge organization and visualization (2017)
0.01
0.013936987 = product of:
0.027873974 = sum of:
0.027873974 = product of:
0.05574795 = sum of:
0.05574795 = weight(_text_:n in 3867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05574795 = score(doc=3867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An event is a specific occurrence involving participants, which is a typed, n-ary association of entities or other events, each identified as a participant in a specific semantic role in the event (Pyysalo et al. 2012; Linguistic Data Consortium 2005). Event types may vary across domains. Representing relationships between events can facilitate the understanding of knowledge in complex systems (such as economic systems, human body, social systems). In the simplest form, an event can be represented as Entity A <Relation> Entity B. This paper evaluates several knowledge organization and visualization models and tools, such as concept maps (Cmap), topic maps (Ontopia), network analysis models (Gephi), and ontology (Protégé), then proposes an event relationship model that aims to integrate the strengths of these models, and can represent complex knowledge expressed in events and their relationships.
-
Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015)
0.01
0.013001267 = product of:
0.026002534 = sum of:
0.026002534 = product of:
0.052005067 = sum of:
0.052005067 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052005067 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56
-
Cao, N.; Sun, J.; Lin, Y.-R.; Gotz, D.; Liu, S.; Qu, H.: FacetAtlas : Multifaceted visualization for rich text corpora (2010)
0.01
0.011614156 = product of:
0.023228312 = sum of:
0.023228312 = product of:
0.046456624 = sum of:
0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456624 = score(doc=3366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hiniker, A.; Hong, S.R.; Kim, Y.-S.; Chen, N.-C.; West, J.D.; Aragon, C.: Toward the operationalization of visual metaphor (2017)
0.01
0.011614156 = product of:
0.023228312 = sum of:
0.023228312 = product of:
0.046456624 = sum of:
0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 3917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456624 = score(doc=3917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 3917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010)
0.01
0.0091932835 = product of:
0.018386567 = sum of:
0.018386567 = product of:
0.036773134 = sum of:
0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036773134 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:36:46
-
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013)
0.01
0.0091932835 = product of:
0.018386567 = sum of:
0.018386567 = product of:
0.036773134 = sum of:
0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036773134 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 2.2015 9:22:39
-
Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2018 16:22:25
-
Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018)
0.01
0.0076610697 = product of:
0.0153221395 = sum of:
0.0153221395 = product of:
0.030644279 = sum of:
0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030644279 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21.12.2018 17:22:13
-
Batorowska, H.; Kaminska-Czubala, B.: Information retrieval support : visualisation of the information space of a document (2014)
0.01
0.0061288555 = product of:
0.012257711 = sum of:
0.012257711 = product of:
0.024515422 = sum of:
0.024515422 = weight(_text_:22 in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024515422 = score(doc=1444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016)
0.00
0.0045966418 = product of:
0.0091932835 = sum of:
0.0091932835 = product of:
0.018386567 = sum of:
0.018386567 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018386567 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045236014 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
