Search (968 results, page 1 of 49)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.09 
    0.089794174 = product of:
  0.17958835 = sum of:
    0.17958835 = sum of:
      0.09291325 = weight(_text_:n in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09291325 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.08667511 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08667511 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  2. Paul-Hus, A.; Desrochers, N.; Rijcke, S.de; Rushforth, A.D.: ¬The reward system of science (2017) 0.08 
    0.0771009 = product of:
  0.1542018 = sum of:
    0.1542018 = sum of:
      0.09291325 = weight(_text_:n in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09291325 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.061288558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061288558 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.08 
    0.0771009 = product of:
  0.1542018 = sum of:
    0.1542018 = sum of:
      0.09291325 = weight(_text_:n in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09291325 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.061288558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061288558 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  4. Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016) 0.08 
    0.0771009 = product of:
  0.1542018 = sum of:
    0.1542018 = sum of:
      0.09291325 = weight(_text_:n in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09291325 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.061288558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061288558 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  5. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.08 
    0.0771009 = product of:
  0.1542018 = sum of:
    0.1542018 = sum of:
      0.09291325 = weight(_text_:n in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09291325 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.061288558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061288558 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
  6. Häring, N.; Hensinger, P.: "Digitale Bildung" : Der abschüssige Weg zur Konditionierungsanstalt (2019) 0.08 
    0.0771009 = product of:
  0.1542018 = sum of:
    0.1542018 = sum of:
      0.09291325 = weight(_text_:n in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09291325 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
      0.061288558 = weight(_text_:22 in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061288558 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2019 11:45:19
  7. Kaiser, R.; Ockenfeld, M.; Skurcz, N.: Wann versteht mich mein Computer endlich? : 1. DGI-Konfernz: Semantic Web & Linked Data - Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen (2011) 0.06 
    0.06168072 = product of:
  0.12336144 = sum of:
    0.12336144 = sum of:
      0.0743306 = weight(_text_:n in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0743306 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.38110018 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
      0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049030844 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    BuB. 63(2011) H.1, S.22-23
  8. Huang, M.; Barbour, J.; Su, C.; Contractor, N.: Why do group members provide information to digital knowledge repositories? : a multilevel application of transactive memory theory (2013) 0.06 
    0.05780632 = product of:
  0.11561264 = sum of:
    0.11561264 = sum of:
      0.0788395 = weight(_text_:n in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0788395 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036773134 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:39:00
  9. Schlicht, T.: Soziale Kognition (2011) 0.06 
    0.05780632 = product of:
  0.11561264 = sum of:
    0.11561264 = sum of:
      0.0788395 = weight(_text_:n in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0788395 = score(doc=4583,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
      0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036773134 = score(doc=4583,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der Mensch ist ein soziales Wesen, und im Alltag gehen wir unhinterfragt davon aus, dass andere Menschen wie wir selbst geistbegabt sind und somit Gefühle, Gedanken und Absichten haben, und wir geben diese Annahme nur in den äußersten Ausnahmefällen auf. Aber auf welche Weise gelangen wir überhaupt zu berechtigten Überzeugungen darüber, was genau andere in einer bestimmten Situation fühlen, denken oder beabsichtigen, wo uns doch ein direkter Zugang zu deren Psyche verwehrt zu sein scheint? Welche Strategie(n) verwenden wir, um Zugang zu der Psyche eines Anderen zu erhalten und welche Art(en) von Wissen sind dabei involviert? Orientieren wir uns eher an unserem eigenen Vorbild und projizieren unsere Vorstellungen in die andere Person hinein oder ähnelt unsere Fähigkeit zur sozialen Kognition eher unserem theoretischen Verständnis anderer 'Objekte'? Beruht unser Wissen über die Psyche eines Anderen auf unserem vorhergehenden Selbstverständnis oder sind intentionaler Selbst- und Frem dbezug systematisch gleichberechtigt? Diese und andere Fragen bewegen nicht nur Philosophen seit alters her, sondern gleichermaßen auch Psychologen sowie jüngst auch Neurowissenschaftler, die solchen Fähigkeiten zugrunde liegende psychologische Prozesse und neuronale Mechanismen im Gehirn untersuchen.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.information-philosophie.de/?a=1&t=7815&n=2#.
    Source
    Information Philosophie. 2014/2 (2014), S.22-27
  10. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05 
    0.053885084 = product of:
  0.10777017 = sum of:
    0.10777017 = product of:
      0.43108067 = sum of:
        0.43108067 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43108067 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38351142 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  11. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.05 
    0.048171937 = product of:
  0.096343875 = sum of:
    0.096343875 = sum of:
      0.06569959 = weight(_text_:n in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06569959 = score(doc=4193,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.33684817 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
      0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030644279 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The development of visual retrieval methods requires information about user interaction with images, including their description and categorization. This article presents the development of a categorization model for magazine images based on two user studies. In Study 1, we elicited 10 main classes of magazine image categorization criteria through sorting tasks with nonexpert and expert users (N=30). Multivariate methods, namely, multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering, were used to analyze similarity data. Content analysis of category names gave rise to classes that were synthesized into a categorization framework. The framework was evaluated in Study 2 by experts (N=24) who categorized another set of images consistent with the framework and found it to be useful in the task. Based on the evaluation study the framework was solidified into a model for categorizing magazine imagery. Connections between classes were analyzed both from the original sorting data and from the evaluation study and included into the final model. The model is a practical categorization tool that may be used in workplaces, such as magazine editorial offices. It may also serve to guide the development of computational methods for image understanding, selection of concepts for automatic detection, and approaches to support browsing and exploratory image search.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
  12. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.05 
    0.046260543 = product of:
  0.09252109 = sum of:
    0.09252109 = sum of:
      0.05574795 = weight(_text_:n in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05574795 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036773134 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  13. Hierl, S.; Bauer, L.; Böllers, N.; Herget, J.: Kollaborative Konzeption von Ontologien in der Hochschullehre : Theorie, Chancen und mögliche Umsetzung (2010) 0.05 
    0.046260543 = product of:
  0.09252109 = sum of:
    0.09252109 = sum of:
      0.05574795 = weight(_text_:n in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05574795 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
      0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036773134 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  14. Wojdynski, B.W.; Kalyanaraman, S.: ¬The three dimensions of website navigability : explication and effects (2016) 0.05 
    0.046260543 = product of:
  0.09252109 = sum of:
    0.09252109 = sum of:
      0.05574795 = weight(_text_:n in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05574795 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
      0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036773134 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although the navigability of digital interfaces has been long discussed as a key determinant of media effects of web use, existing scholarship has not yielded a clear conceptual understanding of navigability, nor how to measure perceived navigability as an outcome. The present paper attempts to redress both and proposes that navigability be conceptually examined along three dimensions, namely, logic of structure, clarity of structure, and clarity of target. A 2?×?2?×?2 factorial between-subjects experiment (N?=?128) was conducted to examine distinct contributions of these dimensions to perceptions of a nonprofit website. The results showed significant effects for logic of structure and clarity on perceived navigability, while logic of structure and content domain involvement affected attitudes toward the website.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:18:13
  15. Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016) 0.05 
    0.046260543 = product of:
  0.09252109 = sum of:
    0.09252109 = sum of:
      0.05574795 = weight(_text_:n in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05574795 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
      0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036773134 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    19. 3.2016 12:22:00
  16. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04 
    0.04490424 = product of:
  0.08980848 = sum of:
    0.08980848 = product of:
      0.35923392 = sum of:
        0.35923392 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35923392 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38351142 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  17. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.04 
    0.044897087 = product of:
  0.089794174 = sum of:
    0.089794174 = sum of:
      0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046456624 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.043337554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043337554 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
  18. Hauser, S.: Terminologiearbeit im Bereich Wissensorganisation : Vergleich dreier Publikationen anhand der Darstellung des Themenkomplexes Thesaurus (2010) 0.04 
    0.03855045 = product of:
  0.0771009 = sum of:
    0.0771009 = sum of:
      0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046456624 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
      0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030644279 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In den letzten Jahren hat Terminologiearbeit in den Bereichen Wissensorganisation bzw. Bibliothek Information Dokumentation (BID)eine gewisse Renaissance erfahren, was sich auch in der Neuauflage einschlägiger Werke äußert. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird hier ein Vergleich solcher aktueller Ansätze von deutschsprachiger Terminologiearbeit geleistet und zu diesem Zweck ein abgrenzbarer Themenkomplex aus drei Publikationen herausgelöst. Genauer gefasst lauten die Fragenstellungen dabei folgendermaßen: - Zu welchen Ergebnissen bzw. Produkten führt Terminologiearbeit? - Welche Unterschiede sind dabei feststellbar? - Auf welche Faktoren können diese Unterschiede zurückgeführt werden? Der Bereich Wissensorganisation - ob im weiteren Sinne verstanden als "Methoden und Systeme zur Organisation von Informationen", als "Objekte und Tätigkeiten der Begriffstheorie, der Klassifikation und Indexierung und der Wissensrepräsentation" (Dahlberg 1994, S.226), ob im engeren Sinn als "descriptions of documents, their contents, features and purposes, and the organization of these descriptions so as to make these documents [...] accessible [...]"2 - Wissensorganisation mit den darin eingesetzten Hilfsmitteln und Instrumenten bedarf als Fachgebiet selbst einer Terminologie, einer "strukturierte[n] Gesamtheit der Begriffe und der diesen zugeordneten Repräsentationen" (Budin 1996, S.16). Diese Fachterminologie ist Gegenstand wie Ergebnis von Terminologiearbeit, indem etwa Termini gesammelt und terminologische Festlegungen getroffen und diese mittels Glossaren oder Fachwörterbüchern zugänglich gemacht werden. Die Betrachtungsweise ist dabei synchron, der Bereich der reinen Deskription wird oft verlassen, es werden präskriptiv Setzungen vorgenommen.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  19. Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 12's bookshelf - evolving intension : an editorial (2013) 0.04 
    0.03855045 = product of:
  0.0771009 = sum of:
    0.0771009 = sum of:
      0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046456624 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030644279 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The 2012 biennial international research conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization was held August 6-9, in Mysore, India. It was the second international ISKO conference to be held in India (Canada and India are the only countries to have hosted two international ISKO conferences), and for many attendees travel to the exotic Indian subcontinent was a new experience. Interestingly, the mix of people attending was quite different from recent meetings held in Europe or North America. The conference was lively and, as usual, jam-packed with new research. Registration took place on a veranda in the garden of the B. N. Bahadur Institute of Management Sciences where the meetings were held at the University of Mysore. This graceful tree (Figure 1) kept us company and kept watch over our considerations (as indeed it does over the academic enterprise of the Institute). The conference theme was "Categories, Contexts and Relations in Knowledge Organization." The opening and closing sessions fittingly were devoted to serious introspection about the direction of the domain of knowledge organization. This editorial, in line with those following past international conferences, is an attempt to comment on the state of the domain by reflecting domain-analytically on the proceedings of the conference, primarily using bibliometric measures. In general, it seems the domain is secure in its intellectual moorings, as it continues to welcome a broad granular array of shifting research questionsin its intension. It seems that the continual concretizing of the theoretical core of knowledge organization (KO) seems to act as a catalyst for emergent ideas, which can be observed as part of the evolving intension of the domain.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:43:34
  20. Brandão, W.C.; Santos, R.L.T.; Ziviani, N.; Moura, E.S. de; Silva, A.S. da: Learning to expand queries using entities (2014) 0.04 
    0.03855045 = product of:
  0.0771009 = sum of:
    0.0771009 = sum of:
      0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 1343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046456624 = score(doc=1343,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 1343, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1343)
      0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 1343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030644279 = score(doc=1343,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045236014 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1343, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1343)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:07:50

Authors

Languages

  • e 713
  • d 245
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 842
  • el 93
  • m 61
  • s 18
  • x 15
  • n 14
  • r 8
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications