Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.02
    0.021857034 = product of:
      0.04371407 = sum of:
        0.04371407 = sum of:
          0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006302999 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03741107 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
    Language
    e
  2. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.02
    0.015441621 = product of:
      0.030883241 = sum of:
        0.030883241 = sum of:
          0.005942525 = weight(_text_:e in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005942525 = score(doc=5171,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.024940716 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024940716 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
    Language
    e
  3. Rousseau, R.: Informetric laws (2009) 0.00
    0.0029712624 = product of:
      0.005942525 = sum of:
        0.005942525 = product of:
          0.01188505 = sum of:
            0.01188505 = weight(_text_:e in 3795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01188505 = score(doc=3795,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 3795, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
    Language
    e
  4. Rousseau, R.: On Egghe's construction of Lorenz curves (2007) 0.00
    0.0026262498 = product of:
      0.0052524996 = sum of:
        0.0052524996 = product of:
          0.010504999 = sum of:
            0.010504999 = weight(_text_:e in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010504999 = score(doc=521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  5. Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  6. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  7. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  8. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  9. Rousseau, R.; Ye, F.Y.: ¬A proposal for a dynamic h-type index (2008) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=2351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  10. Rousseau, R.: Journal evaluation : technical and practical issues (2002) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=816,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This essay provides an overview of journal evaluation indicators. It highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different indicators, together with their range of applicability. The definition of a "quality journal," different notions of impact factors, the meaning of ranking journals, and possible biases in citation databases are also discussed. Attention is given to using the journal impact in evaluation studies. The quality of a journal is a multifaceted notion. Journals can be evaluated for different purposes, and hence the results of such evaluation exercises can be quite different depending on the indicator(s) used. The impact factor, in one of its versions, is probably the most used indicator when it comes to gauging the visibility of a journal on the research front. Generalized impact factors, over periods longer than the traditional two years, are better indicators for the long-term value of a journal. As with all evaluation studies, care must be exercised when considering journal impact factors as a quality indicator. It seems best to use a whole battery of indicators (including several impact factors) and to change this group of indicators depending on the purpose of the evaluation study. Nowadays it goes without saying that special attention is paid to e-journals and specific indicators for this type of journal.
    Language
    e
  11. Rousseau, R.: Robert Fairthorne and the empirical power laws (2005) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 4398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=4398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  12. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  13. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  14. Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Simulating growth of the h-index (2009) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  15. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  16. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization : definitions and relations (2000) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  17. Jin, B.; Li, L.; Rousseau, R.: Long-term influences of interventions in the normal development of science : China and the cultural revolution (2004) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=2232,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  18. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  19. Kretschmer, H.; Rousseau, R.: Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka's law : in and out of context (2001) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  20. Impe, S. van; Rousseau, R.: Web-to-print citations and the humanities (2006) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e