Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02 
    0.022044687 = product of:
  0.044089373 = sum of:
    0.044089373 = product of:
      0.08817875 = sum of:
        0.08817875 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08817875 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  2. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.02 
    0.015441621 = product of:
  0.030883241 = sum of:
    0.030883241 = sum of:
      0.005942525 = weight(_text_:e in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005942525 = score(doc=3608,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04602077 = queryNorm
          0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.024940716 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024940716 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04602077 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
    Language
    e
  3. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.01 
    0.012470358 = product of:
  0.024940716 = sum of:
    0.024940716 = product of:
      0.049881432 = sum of:
        0.049881432 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049881432 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  4. Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021) 0.01 
    0.010911563 = product of:
  0.021823127 = sum of:
    0.021823127 = product of:
      0.043646254 = sum of:
        0.043646254 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043646254 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  5. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.01 
    0.009352768 = product of:
  0.018705536 = sum of:
    0.018705536 = product of:
      0.03741107 = sum of:
        0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03741107 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  6. Taglinger, H.: Ausgevogelt, jetzt wird es ernst (2018) 0.01 
    0.0077939737 = product of:
  0.015587947 = sum of:
    0.015587947 = product of:
      0.031175895 = sum of:
        0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031175895 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:38:55
  7. Snowhill, L.: E-books and their future in academic libraries (2001) 0.00 
    0.004863883 = product of:
  0.009727766 = sum of:
    0.009727766 = product of:
      0.019455532 = sum of:
        0.019455532 = weight(_text_:e in 1218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019455532 = score(doc=1218,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.29411736 = fieldWeight in 1218, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The University of California's California Digital Library (CDL) formed an Ebook Task Force in August 2000 to evaluate academic libraries' experiences with electronic books (e-books), investigate the e-book market, and develop operating guidelines, principles and potential strategies for further exploration of the use of e-books at the University of California (UC). This article, based on the findings and recommendations of the Task Force Report, briefly summarizes task force findings, and outlines issues and recommendations for making e-books viable over the long term in the academic environment, based on the long-term goals of building strong research collections and providing high level services and collections to its users.
    Language
    e
    Object
    E-books
  8. Graf, K.: Zur Open-Access-Heuchelei der Bibliotheken : sie lassen ihr Repositorium e-LiS verkommen (2021) 0.00 
    0.0044568935 = product of:
  0.008913787 = sum of:
    0.008913787 = product of:
      0.017827574 = sum of:
        0.017827574 = weight(_text_:e in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017827574 = score(doc=396,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.26950687 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    E-LIS
  9. Pinfield, S.: How do physicists use an e-print archive? : implications for institutional e-print services (2001) 0.00 
    0.0041524656 = product of:
  0.008304931 = sum of:
    0.008304931 = product of:
      0.016609862 = sum of:
        0.016609862 = weight(_text_:e in 1226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016609862 = score(doc=1226,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.25109822 = fieldWeight in 1226, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It has been suggested that institutional e-print services will become an important way of achieving the wide availability of e-prints across a broad range of subject disciplines. However, as yet there are few exemplars of this sort of service. This paper describes how physicists make use of an established centralized subject-based e-prints service, arXiv (formerly known as the Los Alamos XXX service), and discusses the possible implications of this use for institutional multidisciplinary e-print archives. A number of key points are identified, including technical issues (such as file formats and user interface design), management issues (such as submission procedures and administrative staff support), economic issues (such as installation and support costs), quality issues (such as peer review and quality control criteria), policy issues (such as digital preservation and collection development standards), academic issues (such as scholarly communication cultures and publishing trends), and legal issues (such as copyright and intellectual property rights). These are discussed with reference to the project to set up a pilot institutional e-print service at the University of Nottingham, UK. This project is being used as a pragmatic way of investigating the issues surrounding institutional e-print services, particularly in seeing how flexible the e-prints model actually is and how easily it can adapt itself to disciplines other than physics.
    Language
    e
  10. Herwijnen, E. van: SGML tutorial (1993) 0.00 
    0.0037140779 = product of:
  0.0074281557 = sum of:
    0.0074281557 = product of:
      0.0148563115 = sum of:
        0.0148563115 = weight(_text_:e in 8747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0148563115 = score(doc=8747,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 8747, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8747)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  11. Erkal, E.: Allegations linking Sci-Hub with Russian intelligence (2019) 0.00 
    0.0037140779 = product of:
  0.0074281557 = sum of:
    0.0074281557 = product of:
      0.0148563115 = sum of:
        0.0148563115 = weight(_text_:e in 4625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0148563115 = score(doc=4625,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 4625, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4625)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  12. Academic publishing : No peeking (2014) 0.00 
    0.0036767495 = product of:
  0.007353499 = sum of:
    0.007353499 = product of:
      0.014706998 = sum of:
        0.014706998 = weight(_text_:e in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014706998 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  13. Fallaw, C.; Dunham, E.; Wickes, E.; Strong, D.; Stein, A.; Zhang, Q.; Rimkus, K.; ill Ingram, B.; Imker, H.J.: Overly honest data repository development (2016) 0.00 
    0.0031841588 = product of:
  0.0063683176 = sum of:
    0.0063683176 = product of:
      0.012736635 = sum of:
        0.012736635 = weight(_text_:e in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012736635 = score(doc=3371,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.19254501 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  14. Zhang, A.: Multimedia file formats on the Internet : a beginner's guide for PC users (1995) 0.00 
    0.0031514994 = product of:
  0.006302999 = sum of:
    0.006302999 = product of:
      0.012605998 = sum of:
        0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 3212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012605998 = score(doc=3212,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 3212, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3212)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  15. Díaz, P.: Usability of hypermedia educational e-books (2003) 0.00 
    0.0031514994 = product of:
  0.006302999 = sum of:
    0.006302999 = product of:
      0.012605998 = sum of:
        0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012605998 = score(doc=1198,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    To arrive at relevant and reliable conclusions concerning the usability of a hypermedia educational e-book, developers have to apply a well-defined evaluation procedure as well as a set of clear, concrete and measurable quality criteria. Evaluating an educational tool involves not only testing the user interface but also the didactic method, the instructional materials and the interaction mechanisms to prove whether or not they help users reach their goals for learning. This article presents a number of evaluation criteria for hypermedia educational e-books and describes how they are embedded into an evaluation procedure. This work is chiefly aimed at helping education developers evaluate their systems, as well as to provide them with guidance for addressing educational requirements during the design process. In recent years, more and more educational e-books are being created, whether by academics trying to keep pace with the advanced requirements of the virtual university or by publishers seeking to meet the increasing demand for educational resources that can be accessed anywhere and anytime, and that include multimedia information, hypertext links and powerful search and annotating mechanisms. To develop a useful educational e-book many things have to be considered, such as the reading patterns of users, accessibility for different types of users and computer platforms, copyright and legal issues, development of new business models and so on. Addressing usability is very important since e-books are interactive systems and, consequently, have to be designed with the needs of their users in mind. Evaluating usability involves analyzing whether systems are effective, efficient and secure for use; easy to learn and remember; and have a good utility. Any interactive system, as e-books are, has to be assessed to determine if it is really usable as well as useful. Such an evaluation is not only concerned with assessing the user interface but is also aimed at analyzing whether the system can be used in an efficient way to meet the needs of its users - who in the case of educational e-books are learners and teachers. Evaluation provides the opportunity to gather valuable information about design decisions. However, to be successful the evaluation has to be carefully planned and prepared so developers collect appropriate and reliable data from which to draw relevant conclusions.
    Language
    e
  16. Bailey, C.W. Jr.: Scholarly electronic publishing bibliography (2003) 0.00 
    0.0022284468 = product of:
  0.0044568935 = sum of:
    0.0044568935 = product of:
      0.008913787 = sum of:
        0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008913787 = score(doc=1656,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Table of Contents 1 Economic Issues* 2 Electronic Books and Texts 2.1 Case Studies and History 2.2 General Works* 2.3 Library Issues* 3 Electronic Serials 3.1 Case Studies and History 3.2 Critiques 3.3 Electronic Distribution of Printed Journals 3.4 General Works* 3.5 Library Issues* 3.6 Research* 4 General Works* 5 Legal Issues 5.1 Intellectual Property Rights* 5.2 License Agreements 5.3 Other Legal Issues 6 Library Issues 6.1 Cataloging, Identifiers, Linking, and Metadata* 6.2 Digital Libraries* 6.3 General Works* 6.4 Information Integrity and Preservation* 7 New Publishing Models* 8 Publisher Issues 8.1 Digital Rights Management* 9 Repositories and E-Prints* Appendix A. Related Bibliographies by the Same Author Appendix B. About the Author
    Language
    e
  17. Tozer, J.: How long is the perfect book? : Bigger really is better. What the numbers say (2019) 0.00 
    0.0021009997 = product of:
  0.0042019994 = sum of:
    0.0042019994 = product of:
      0.008403999 = sum of:
        0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008403999 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  18. Buranyi, S.: Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? (2017) 0.00 
    0.0018383748 = product of:
  0.0036767495 = sum of:
    0.0036767495 = product of:
      0.007353499 = sum of:
        0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 3711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007353499 = score(doc=3711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3711)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  19. Gutknecht, C.: Zahlungen der ETH Zürich an Elsevier, Springer und Wiley nun öffentlich (2015) 0.00 
    0.0018383748 = product of:
  0.0036767495 = sum of:
    0.0036767495 = product of:
      0.007353499 = sum of:
        0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007353499 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Was bezahlt die ETH Bibliothek an Elsevier, Springer und Wiley? Die Antwort auf diese einfache Frage liegt nun nach gut 14 Monaten und einem Entscheid der ersten Rekursinstanz (EDÖB) vor. Werfen wir nun also einen Blick in diese nun erstmals öffentlich zugänglichen Daten (auch als XLSX). Die ETH-Bibliothek schlüsselte die Ausgaben wie von mir gewünscht in Datenbanken, E-Books und Zeitschriften auf.
  20. Schleim, S.: Fake Science? : Die Sache mit den Raubverlagen (2018) 0.00 
    0.0015757497 = product of:
  0.0031514994 = sum of:
    0.0031514994 = product of:
      0.006302999 = sum of:
        0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006302999 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04602077 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Über gute Wissenschaft und die Privatisierung öffentlicher Mittel Publizieren, von lateinisch publicare = veröffentlichen, ist ein Wesensmerkmal der Wissenschaft. Neue wissenschaftliche Kenntnisse sollen nicht nur den Fachkollegen und potenziell für den Fortschritt der ganzen Menschheit zur Verfügung stehen, sondern durch die Veröffentlichung auch überprüfbar werden. So würden langfristig Fehler aufgespürt, entfernt und dann gesicherte Erkenntnis übrig bleiben. So weit die Theorie. In der Praxis haben große Verlagshäuser wie Elsevier (laut Wikipedia rund 2,5 Milliarden Pfund Jahresumsatz), Springer Nature (rund 1,6 Milliarden Euro), Taylor and Francis (rund 530 Millionen Pfund) oder Wiley (rund 1,7 Milliarden Dollar), die die Veröffentlichungen traditionell organisieren, große Umsätze und damit auch große Profitinteressen. In Zeiten des Internets und des e-Publishings wird deren Rolle zunehmend in Frage gestellt. Immer mehr Zeitschriften erscheinen nur noch online. Und selbst bei denjenigen, die noch als Papierversion zirkulieren, spielt sich für die Wissenschaftler das Wesentliche in den Vorab-Veröffentlichungen online ab. Bis die Druckausgabe erscheint, sind die Studien mitunter schon längst Schnee von gestern.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 17
  • d 9

Types

  • a 21
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes