Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.03
    0.029472843 = product of:
      0.058945686 = sum of:
        0.058945686 = sum of:
          0.0148563115 = weight(_text_:e in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0148563115 = score(doc=2808,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.044089373 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044089373 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
    Language
    e
  2. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.03
    0.025499877 = product of:
      0.050999753 = sum of:
        0.050999753 = sum of:
          0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007353499 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.043646254 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043646254 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Language
    e
  3. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.02
    0.021857034 = product of:
      0.04371407 = sum of:
        0.04371407 = sum of:
          0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006302999 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03741107 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  4. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.02
    0.021857034 = product of:
      0.04371407 = sum of:
        0.04371407 = sum of:
          0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006302999 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03741107 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04602077 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
    Language
    e
  5. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01
    0.012470358 = product of:
      0.024940716 = sum of:
        0.024940716 = product of:
          0.049881432 = sum of:
            0.049881432 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049881432 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  6. Youngen, G.K.: Citation patterns to traditional and electronic preprints in the published literature (1998) 0.00
    0.004169042 = product of:
      0.008338084 = sum of:
        0.008338084 = product of:
          0.016676169 = sum of:
            0.016676169 = weight(_text_:e in 3360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016676169 = score(doc=3360,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.2521006 = fieldWeight in 3360, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The number of physics and astronomy preprints (manuscripts intended for publication but circulated for peer comment prior to submission) available electronically has increased dramatically over the past 5 years and Internet accessible preprint Web servers at the Stanford Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) and the Los Alamos National Laboratoty (LANL) provide unrestricted access to citations and full text of many of these papers long before they appear in print. Includes data for periodicals ranked by number of citations to preprints and electronic preprints (e-prints). Identifies the growing importance of e-prints in the published literature and addresses areas of concern regarding their future role in scientific communication, including: inclusion of e-prints in abstracting and indexing services; connecting electronic periodicals with e-prints; guidelines for withdrawal and revision of e-prints; and maintaining the integritiy of the e-print servers
    Language
    e
  7. Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001) 0.00
    0.0036767495 = product of:
      0.007353499 = sum of:
        0.007353499 = product of:
          0.014706998 = sum of:
            0.014706998 = weight(_text_:e in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014706998 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  8. Brody, T.; Harnad, S.; Carr, L.: Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006) 0.00
    0.0025998545 = product of:
      0.005199709 = sum of:
        0.005199709 = product of:
          0.010399418 = sum of:
            0.010399418 = weight(_text_:e in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010399418 = score(doc=165,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The use of citation counts to assess the impact of research articles is well established. However, the citation impact of an article can only be measured several years after it has been published. As research articles are increasingly accessed through the Web, the number of times an article is downloaded can be instantly recorded and counted. One would expect the number of times an article is read to be related both to the number of times it is cited and to how old the article is. The authors analyze how short-term Web usage impact predicts medium-term citation impact. The physics e-print archive-arXiv.org-is used to test this.
    Language
    e
  9. Thelwall, M.: Webometrics (2009) 0.00
    0.0022284468 = product of:
      0.0044568935 = sum of:
        0.0044568935 = product of:
          0.008913787 = sum of:
            0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 3906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008913787 = score(doc=3906,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3906, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3906)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
    Language
    e
  10. Teplitskiy, M.; Lu, G.; Duede, E.: Amplifying the impact of open access : Wikipedia and the diffusion of science (2017) 0.00
    0.0022284468 = product of:
      0.0044568935 = sum of:
        0.0044568935 = product of:
          0.008913787 = sum of:
            0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 3782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008913787 = score(doc=3782,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3782, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  11. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: Webometrics : an introduction to the special issue (2004) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  12. Kaminer, N.; Braunstein, Y.M.: Bibliometric analysis of the impact of Internet use on scholarly productivity (1998) 0.00
    0.0021009997 = product of:
      0.0042019994 = sum of:
        0.0042019994 = product of:
          0.008403999 = sum of:
            0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008403999 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  13. Amitay, E.; Carmel, D.; Herscovici, M.; Lempel, R.; Soffer, A.: Trend detection through temporal link analysis (2004) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=3092,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  14. Thelwall, M.: ¬A comparison of link and URL citation counting (2011) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 4533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=4533,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 4533, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4533)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Link analysis is an established topic within webometrics. It normally uses counts of links between sets of web sites or to sets of web sites. These link counts are derived from web crawlers or commercial search engines with the latter being the only alternative for some investigations. This paper compares link counts with URL citation counts in order to assess whether the latter could be a replacement for the former if the major search engines withdraw their advanced hyperlink search facilities. Design/methodology/approach - URL citation counts are compared with link counts for a variety of data sets used in previous webometric studies. Findings - The results show a high degree of correlation between the two but with URL citations being much less numerous, at least outside academia and business. Research limitations/implications - The results cover a small selection of 15 case studies and so the findings are only indicative. Significant differences between results indicate that the difference between link counts and URL citation counts will vary between webometric studies. Practical implications - Should link searches be withdrawn, then link analyses of less well linked non-academic, non-commercial sites would be seriously weakened, although citations based on e-mail addresses could help to make citations more numerous than links for some business and academic contexts. Originality/value - This is the first systematic study of the difference between link counts and URL citation counts in a variety of contexts and it shows that there are significant differences between the two.
    Language
    e
  15. Larson, R.R.: Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web : an exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace (1996) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 7334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=7334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 7334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  16. Ingwersen, P.: ¬The calculation of Web impact factors (1998) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  17. Park, H.W.; Barnett, G.A.; Nam, I.-Y.: Hyperlink - affiliation network structure of top Web sites : examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea (2002) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  18. Marchionini, G.: Co-evolution of user and organizational interfaces : a longitudinal case study of WWW dissemination of national statistics (2002) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=1252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  19. Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Evolution, continuity, and disappearance of documents on a specific topic an the Web : a longitudinal study of "informetrics" (2004) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=2886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  20. Björneborn, L.; Ingwersen, P.: Toward a basic framework for Webometrics (2004) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 3088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=3088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 57
  • m 1
  • More… Less…