Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Haake, E.; Blenkle, M.; Ellis, R.; Zillmann, H.: Nur die ersten Drei zählen! : Optimierung der Rankingverfahren über Popularitätsfaktoren bei der Elektronischen Bibliothek Bremen (E-LIB) (2015) 0.00
    0.0035234839 = product of:
      0.0070469677 = sum of:
        0.0070469677 = product of:
          0.0140939355 = sum of:
            0.0140939355 = weight(_text_:e in 2150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0140939355 = score(doc=2150,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.2130639 = fieldWeight in 2150, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Seit Einführung der neuen Discovery-Kataloge stehen unseren Nutzerinnen und Nutzern zusätzlich Millionen von Dokumenten neben dem lokalen Buchbestand zur Verfügung. Diese Zielgruppe muss in die Lage versetzt werden, die für sie relevanten Titel einfach und sicher zu finden. Die Qualität von Empfehlungsfunktionen und besonders der Relevanz-Ranking-Methoden sind daher für den Erfolg eines Discovery-Systems besonders wichtig. Das Ranking bibliothekarischer Suchmaschinentechnik ignoriert bisher das Feedback durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer. Die Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen (SuUB) setzt mit dem in Bremen entwickelten Discovery-System "E-LIB" seit Sommer 2011 zusätzlich auf eine Modifikation des Treffer-Rankings über Popularitätsfaktoren der Medien wie Klickstatistik, Auflagen- und Exemplarzahl. Die maßgeschneiderte Entwicklung eines eigenen Bibliothekskataloges, den die SuUB seit 2004 mit dem Discovery-System "E-LIB" in Bremen betreibt, erlaubt die schnelle und flexible Anpassung von Retrievalfunktionen an die Bedürfnisse der Nutzerinnen und Nutzer vor Ort.
    Object
    E-LIB
  2. Hider, P.: ¬The bibliographic advantages of a centralised union catalogue for ILL and resource sharing (2003) 0.00
    0.0031514994 = product of:
      0.006302999 = sum of:
        0.006302999 = product of:
          0.012605998 = sum of:
            0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012605998 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  3. Blenkle, M.: Elektronische Bibliothek (E-LIB) (o.J.) 0.00
    0.0026262498 = product of:
      0.0052524996 = sum of:
        0.0052524996 = product of:
          0.010504999 = sum of:
            0.010504999 = weight(_text_:e in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010504999 = score(doc=2480,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die E-LIB der SuUB Bremen arbeitet bereits seit 2004 als einheitlicher Katalog elektronischer und gedruckter Medien auf Basis von selbst entwickelter Suchmaschinentechnologie. Alle wesentlichen Medien und Dienste der Bibliothek werden unter einer Suchoberfläche angeboten, um die übliche heterogene Nachweissituation der verschiedenen Medientypen soweit wie möglich aufzulösen. Das Projekt verfolgt das Ziel, alle lokalen Bestände vor Ort und alle für Bremer Nutzer im Zugriff extern verfügbaren Medien in einem einzigen Retrievalsystem zur Verfügung zu stellen und neu entwickelte Verfahren zur Unterstützung von assoziativen Suchprozessen anzubieten. In dem von der Bibliothek kontrollierten Suchraum der Bremer E-LIB finden sich derzeit ca. 60 Mio. Nachweise - zu über 90% elektronische Volltexte.
    Source
    http://www.suub.uni-bremen.de/infos/projektinformationen-e-lib/
  4. Whitney , C.; Schiff, L.: ¬The Melvyl Recommender Project : developing library recommendation services (2006) 0.00
    0.0022284468 = product of:
      0.0044568935 = sum of:
        0.0044568935 = product of:
          0.008913787 = sum of:
            0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008913787 = score(doc=1173,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Popular commercial on-line services such as Google, e-Bay, Amazon, and Netflix have evolved quickly over the last decade to help people find what they want, developing information retrieval strategies such as usefully ranked results, spelling correction, and recommender systems. Online library catalogs (OPACs), in contrast, have changed little and are notoriously difficult for patrons to use (University of California Libraries, 2005). Over the past year (June 2005 to the present), the Melvyl Recommender Project (California Digital Library, 2005) has been exploring methods and feasibility of closing the gap between features that library patrons want and have come to expect from information retrieval systems and what libraries are currently equipped to deliver. The project team conducted exploratory work in five topic areas: relevance ranking, auto-correction, use of a text-based discovery system, user interface strategies, and recommending. This article focuses specifically on the recommending portion of the project and potential extensions to that work.
    Language
    e
  5. Byrd, J.; Charbonneau, G.; Charbonneau, M.; Courtney, A.; Johnson, E.; Leonard, K.; Morrison, A.; Mudge, S.; O'Bryan, A.; Opasik, S.; Riley, J.; Turchyn, S.: ¬A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University (2006) 0.00
    0.0018570389 = product of:
      0.0037140779 = sum of:
        0.0037140779 = product of:
          0.0074281557 = sum of:
            0.0074281557 = weight(_text_:e in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074281557 = score(doc=3225,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  6. McGrath, K.; Kules, B.; Fitzpatrick, C.: FRBR and facets provide flexible, work-centric access to items in library collections (2011) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  7. Tillett, B.B.: RDA, or, The long journey of the catalog to the digital age (2016) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  8. Cossham, A.F.: Models of the bibliographic universe (2017) 0.00
    0.0018383748 = product of:
      0.0036767495 = sum of:
        0.0036767495 = product of:
          0.007353499 = sum of:
            0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007353499 = score(doc=3817,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  9. Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006) 0.00
    0.0018195192 = product of:
      0.0036390384 = sum of:
        0.0036390384 = product of:
          0.007278077 = sum of:
            0.007278077 = weight(_text_:e in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007278077 = score(doc=5013,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.11002572 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
    Language
    e
  10. Mann, T.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Final report. March 17, 2006. Prepared for the Library of Congress by Karen Calhoun : A critical review (2006) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=5012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  11. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2005) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=1086,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  12. Coyle, K.: ¬The virtual union catalog : a comparative study (2000) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 1230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=1230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  13. Weinheimer, J.: ¬A visual explanation of the areas defined by AACR2, RDA, ISBD, LC NAF, LC Classification, LC Subject Headings, Dewey Classification, MARC21 : plus a quick look at ISO2709, MARCXML and a version of BIBFRAME (2015) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  14. Klic, L.; Miller, M.; Nelson, J.K.; Pattuelli, C.; Provo, A.: ¬The drawings of the Florentine painters : from print catalog to linked open data (2017) 0.00
    0.0015757497 = product of:
      0.0031514994 = sum of:
        0.0031514994 = product of:
          0.006302999 = sum of:
            0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006302999 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  15. Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007) 0.00
    0.0013131249 = product of:
      0.0026262498 = sum of:
        0.0026262498 = product of:
          0.0052524996 = sum of:
            0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0052524996 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  16. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.00
    0.0013131249 = product of:
      0.0026262498 = sum of:
        0.0026262498 = product of:
          0.0052524996 = sum of:
            0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0052524996 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  17. Dobreski, B.: Authority and universalism : conventional values in descriptive catalog codes (2017) 0.00
    0.0010504998 = product of:
      0.0021009997 = sum of:
        0.0021009997 = product of:
          0.0042019994 = sum of:
            0.0042019994 = weight(_text_:e in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042019994 = score(doc=3876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  18. Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007) 0.00
    9.191874E-4 = product of:
      0.0018383748 = sum of:
        0.0018383748 = product of:
          0.0036767495 = sum of:
            0.0036767495 = weight(_text_:e in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0036767495 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.05558295 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  19. Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007) 0.00
    7.8787486E-4 = product of:
      0.0015757497 = sum of:
        0.0015757497 = product of:
          0.0031514994 = sum of:
            0.0031514994 = weight(_text_:e in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0031514994 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04602077 = queryNorm
                0.04764253 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e