Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.013257908 = product of:
  0.026515815 = sum of:
    0.026515815 = product of:
      0.05303163 = sum of:
        0.05303163 = weight(_text_:h in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05303163 = score(doc=454,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

h-index

0.010825037 = product of:
  0.021650074 = sum of:
    0.021650074 = product of:
      0.043300148 = sum of:
        0.043300148 = weight(_text_:h in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043300148 = score(doc=2350,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

I discuss how, given a certain number of articles and citations of these articles, the h-index and the g-index are affected by the level of concentration of the citations. This offers the opportunity for a comparison between these 2 indices from a new perspective.

Object

h-index