-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.018624721 = product of:
0.037249442 = sum of:
0.037249442 = product of:
0.074498884 = sum of:
0.074498884 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074498884 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996)
0.01
0.0062498376 = product of:
0.012499675 = sum of:
0.012499675 = product of:
0.02499935 = sum of:
0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02499935 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cogito. 12(1996) H.4, S.35-38
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
0.01
0.0055241287 = product of:
0.011048257 = sum of:
0.011048257 = product of:
0.022096515 = sum of:
0.022096515 = weight(_text_:h in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022096515 = score(doc=4132,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
0.00
0.0039061487 = product of:
0.0078122974 = sum of:
0.0078122974 = product of:
0.015624595 = sum of:
0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015624595 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this study, reference standards and reference multipliers are suggested as a means to compare the citation impact of earlier research publications in physics (from the period of "Little Science" in the early 20th century) with that of contemporary papers (from the period of "Big Science," beginning around 1960). For the development of time-specific reference standards, the authors determined (a) the mean citation rates of papers in selected physics journals as well as (b) the mean citation rates of all papers in physics published in 1900 (Little Science) and in 2000 (Big Science); this was accomplished by relying on the processes of field-specific standardization in bibliometry. For the sake of developing reference multipliers with which the citation impact of earlier papers can be adjusted to the citation impact of contemporary papers, they combined the reference standards calculated for 1900 and 2000 into their ratio. The use of reference multipliers is demonstrated by means of two examples involving the time adjusted h index values for Max Planck and Albert Einstein.
-
Bornmann, L.; Thor, A.; Marx, W.; Schier, H.: ¬The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences : an exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute (2016)
0.00
0.0039061487 = product of:
0.0078122974 = sum of:
0.0078122974 = product of:
0.015624595 = sum of:
0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 3160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015624595 = score(doc=3160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Neuhaus, C.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-W.: ¬The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts : a case study on the limitations of the Journal Impact Factor (2009)
0.00
0.0031249188 = product of:
0.0062498376 = sum of:
0.0062498376 = product of:
0.012499675 = sum of:
0.012499675 = weight(_text_:h in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012499675 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
