Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01
    0.012416481 = product of:
      0.024832962 = sum of:
        0.024832962 = product of:
          0.049665924 = sum of:
            0.049665924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049665924 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  2. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.01
    0.010864421 = product of:
      0.021728842 = sum of:
        0.021728842 = product of:
          0.043457683 = sum of:
            0.043457683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043457683 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  3. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01
    0.009312361 = product of:
      0.018624721 = sum of:
        0.018624721 = product of:
          0.037249442 = sum of:
            0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037249442 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  4. Lewen, H.: Personalisierte Ordnung von Objekten basierend auf Vertrauensnetzwerken (2008) 0.01
    0.008838605 = product of:
      0.01767721 = sum of:
        0.01767721 = product of:
          0.03535442 = sum of:
            0.03535442 = weight(_text_:h in 2305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03535442 = score(doc=2305,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 2305, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2305)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.5, S.297-300
  5. Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008) 0.01
    0.0062498376 = product of:
      0.012499675 = sum of:
        0.012499675 = product of:
          0.02499935 = sum of:
            0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02499935 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.5, S.293-296
  6. Regulski, K.: Aufwand und Nutzen beim Einsatz von Social-Bookmarking-Services als Nachweisinstrument für wissenschaftliche Forschungsartikel am Beispiel von BibSonomy (2007) 0.01
    0.0062498376 = product of:
      0.012499675 = sum of:
        0.012499675 = product of:
          0.02499935 = sum of:
            0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 4595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02499935 = score(doc=4595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 31(2007) H.2, S.177-184
  7. Frohner, H.: Social Tagging : Grundlagen, Anwendungen, Auswirkungen auf Wissensorganisation und soziale Strukturen der User (2010) 0.01
    0.0055241287 = product of:
      0.011048257 = sum of:
        0.011048257 = product of:
          0.022096515 = sum of:
            0.022096515 = weight(_text_:h in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022096515 = score(doc=4723,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Teilw. zugl.: Wien, Techn. Univ., Masterarb., 2009. Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.5, S.268269 (I. Peters)
  8. Bertram, J.: Social Tagging : zum Potential einer neuen Indexiermethode (2009) 0.01
    0.005468608 = product of:
      0.010937216 = sum of:
        0.010937216 = product of:
          0.021874432 = sum of:
            0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 2328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021874432 = score(doc=2328,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2328, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2328)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.1, S.19-26
  9. Sack, H.; Waitelonis, J.: Zeitbezogene kollaborative Annotation zur Verbesserung der inhaltsbasierten Videosuche (2008) 0.01
    0.005468608 = product of:
      0.010937216 = sum of:
        0.010937216 = product of:
          0.021874432 = sum of:
            0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 2890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021874432 = score(doc=2890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.01
    0.005468608 = product of:
      0.010937216 = sum of:
        0.010937216 = product of:
          0.021874432 = sum of:
            0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021874432 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.4, S.273-280
  11. Heuwing, B.: Erfahrungen an der Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim : Social Tagging in Bibliotheken (2010) 0.00
    0.004687378 = product of:
      0.009374756 = sum of:
        0.009374756 = product of:
          0.018749513 = sum of:
            0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018749513 = score(doc=4013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.6/7, S.407-411
  12. Web-2.0-Dienste als Ergänzung zu algorithmischen Suchmaschinen (2008) 0.00
    0.004687378 = product of:
      0.009374756 = sum of:
        0.009374756 = product of:
          0.018749513 = sum of:
            0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018749513 = score(doc=4323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Das Buchprojekt entstand im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes Theseus (Teilprojekt Alexandria). - Als Online Publikation vgl.: http://www.bui.haw-hamburg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/lewandowski/Web20-Buch/lewandowski-maass.pdf. Rez. in: ZfBB 56(2009) H.2, S.134-135 (K. Lepsky)
  13. Heck, T.: Analyse von sozialen Informationen für Autorenempfehlungen (2012) 0.00
    0.004687378 = product of:
      0.009374756 = sum of:
        0.009374756 = product of:
          0.018749513 = sum of:
            0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018749513 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.4, S.261-272
  14. BOND: Katalogisate-Pool BCS kommt gut an (2008) 0.00
    0.0039061487 = product of:
      0.0078122974 = sum of:
        0.0078122974 = product of:
          0.015624595 = sum of:
            0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 1977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015624595 = score(doc=1977,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1977, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1977)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    BuB. 60(2008) H.7/8, S.552
  15. Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.00
    0.0019530744 = product of:
      0.0039061487 = sum of:
        0.0039061487 = product of:
          0.0078122974 = sum of:
            0.0078122974 = weight(_text_:h in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078122974 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Enthält die Beiträge der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen. Volltext unter: http://www.waxmann.com/kat/inhalt/2039Volltext.pdf. Vgl. die Rez. unter: http://sehepunkte.de/2008/11/14934.html. Rez. in: IWP 60(1009) H.4, S.246-247 (C. Wolff): "Tagging-Systeme erfreuen sich in den letzten Jahren einer ungemein großen Beliebtheit, erlauben sie dem Nutzer doch die Informationserschließung "mit eigenen Worten", also ohne Rekurs auf vorgegebene Ordnungs- und Begriffsysteme und für Medien wie Bild und Video, für die herkömmliche Verfahren des Information Retrieval (noch) versagen. Die Beherrschung der Film- und Bilderfülle, wie wir sie bei Flickr oder YouTube vorfinden, ist mit anderen Mitteln als dem intellektuellen Einsatz der Nutzer nicht vorstellbar - eine professionelle Aufbereitung angesichts der Massendaten (und ihrer zu einem großen Teil auch minderen Qualität) nicht möglich und sinnvoll. Insofern hat sich Tagging als ein probates Mittel der Erschließung herausgebildet, das dort Lücken füllen kann, wo andere Verfahren (Erschließung durch information professionals, automatische Indexierung, Erschließung durch Autoren) fehlen oder nicht anwendbar sind. Unter dem Titel "Good Tags - Bad Tags. Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" und der Herausgeberschaft von Birgit Gaiser, Thorsten Hampel und Stefanie Panke sind in der Reihe Medien in der Wissenschaft (Bd. 47) Beiträge eines interdisziplinären Workshops der Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft zum Thema Tagging versammelt, der im Frühjahr 2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien in Tübingen stattgefunden hat. . . .
  16. Hänger, C.; Krätzsch, C.; Niemann, C.: Was vom Tagging übrig blieb : Erkenntnisse und Einsichten aus zwei Jahren Projektarbeit (2011) 0.00
    0.0019530744 = product of:
      0.0039061487 = sum of:
        0.0039061487 = product of:
          0.0078122974 = sum of:
            0.0078122974 = weight(_text_:h in 4519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078122974 = score(doc=4519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 4519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4519)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 45(2011) H.5, S.465-478