Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Järvelin, K."
  1. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.03
    0.032730866 = product of:
      0.06546173 = sum of:
        0.06546173 = sum of:
          0.029559668 = weight(_text_:j in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029559668 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14033248 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04416448 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.035902064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035902064 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15465648 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04416448 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  2. Kristensen, J.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The effectiveness of a searching thesaurus in free-text searching in a full-text database (1990) 0.02
    0.019706445 = product of:
      0.03941289 = sum of:
        0.03941289 = product of:
          0.07882578 = sum of:
            0.07882578 = weight(_text_:j in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07882578 = score(doc=2043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14033248 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Järvelin, K.; Ingwersen, P.: User-oriented and cognitive models of information retrieval (2009) 0.01
    0.011099214 = product of:
      0.022198427 = sum of:
        0.022198427 = product of:
          0.11099213 = sum of:
            0.11099213 = weight(_text_:taylor in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11099213 = score(doc=3901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25175676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.700435 = idf(docFreq=401, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.44087052 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.700435 = idf(docFreq=401, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    London : Taylor & Francis
  4. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.01
    0.008975516 = product of:
      0.017951032 = sum of:
        0.017951032 = product of:
          0.035902064 = sum of:
            0.035902064 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035902064 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15465648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  5. Sormunen, E.; Kekäläinen, J.; Koivisto, J.; Järvelin, K.: Document text characteristics affect the ranking of the most relevant documents by expanded structured queries (2001) 0.01
    0.0087091 = product of:
      0.0174182 = sum of:
        0.0174182 = product of:
          0.0348364 = sum of:
            0.0348364 = weight(_text_:j in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348364 = score(doc=4487,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14033248 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Saarikoski, J.; Laurikkala, J.; Järvelin, K.; Juhola, M.: ¬A study of the use of self-organising maps in information retrieval (2009) 0.01
    0.0087091 = product of:
      0.0174182 = sum of:
        0.0174182 = product of:
          0.0348364 = sum of:
            0.0348364 = weight(_text_:j in 2836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0348364 = score(doc=2836,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14033248 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 2836, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2836)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Näppilä, T.; Järvelin, K.; Niemi, T.: ¬A tool for data cube construction from structurally heterogeneous XML documents (2008) 0.01
    0.007479597 = product of:
      0.014959194 = sum of:
        0.014959194 = product of:
          0.029918388 = sum of:
            0.029918388 = weight(_text_:22 in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029918388 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15465648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:22:42
  8. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.01
    0.007479597 = product of:
      0.014959194 = sum of:
        0.014959194 = product of:
          0.029918388 = sum of:
            0.029918388 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029918388 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15465648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
  9. Toivonen, J.; Pirkola, A.; Keskustalo, H.; Visala, K.; Järvelin, K.: Translating cross-lingual spelling variants using transformation rules (2005) 0.01
    0.007389917 = product of:
      0.014779834 = sum of:
        0.014779834 = product of:
          0.029559668 = sum of:
            0.029559668 = weight(_text_:j in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029559668 = score(doc=1052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14033248 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Kekäläinen, J.; Järvelin, K.: Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation (2002) 0.01
    0.006158264 = product of:
      0.012316528 = sum of:
        0.012316528 = product of:
          0.024633056 = sum of:
            0.024633056 = weight(_text_:j in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024633056 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14033248 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Talvensaari, T.; Laurikkala, J.; Järvelin, K.; Juhola, M.: ¬A study on automatic creation of a comparable document collection in cross-language information retrieval (2006) 0.01
    0.006158264 = product of:
      0.012316528 = sum of:
        0.012316528 = product of:
          0.024633056 = sum of:
            0.024633056 = weight(_text_:j in 5601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024633056 = score(doc=5601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14033248 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Talvensaari, T.; Juhola, M.; Laurikkala, J.; Järvelin, K.: Corpus-based cross-language information retrieval in retrieval of highly relevant documents (2007) 0.01
    0.006158264 = product of:
      0.012316528 = sum of:
        0.012316528 = product of:
          0.024633056 = sum of:
            0.024633056 = weight(_text_:j in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024633056 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14033248 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Ingwersen, P.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The turn : integration of information seeking and retrieval in context (2005) 0.00
    0.0039640046 = product of:
      0.007928009 = sum of:
        0.007928009 = product of:
          0.039640043 = sum of:
            0.039640043 = weight(_text_:taylor in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039640043 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25175676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.700435 = idf(docFreq=401, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04416448 = queryNorm
                0.15745375 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.700435 = idf(docFreq=401, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    - Kapitel fünf enthält einen entsprechenden Überblick über die kognitive und benutzerorientierte IR-Tradition. Es zeigt, welche anderen (als nur die labororientierten) IR-Studien durchgeführt werden können, wobei sich die Betrachtung von frühen Modellen (z.B. Taylor) über Belkins ASK-Konzept bis zu Ingwersens Modell der Polyrepräsentation, und von Bates Berrypicking-Ansatz bis zu Vakkaris "taskbased" IR-Modell erstreckt. Auch Web-IR, OKAPI und Diskussionen zum Relevanzbegriff werden hier thematisiert. - Im folgenden Kapitel schlagen die Autoren ein integriertes IS&R Forschungsmodell vor, bei dem die vielfältigen Beziehungen zwischen Informationssuchenden, Systementwicklern, Oberflächen und anderen beteiligten Aspekten berücksichtigt werden. Ihr Ansatz vereint die traditionelle Laborforschung mit verschiedenen benutzerorientierten Traditionen aus IS&R, insbesondere mit den empirischen Ansätzen zu IS und zum interaktiven IR, in einem holistischen kognitiven Modell. - Kapitel sieben untersucht die Implikationen dieses Modells für IS&R, wobei besonders ins Auge fällt, wie komplex die Anfragen von Informationssuchenden im Vergleich mit der relativen Einfachheit der Algorithmen zum Auffinden relevanter Dokumente sind. Die Abbildung der vielfältig variierenden kognitiven Zustände der Anfragesteller im Rahmen der der Systementwicklung ist sicherlich keine triviale Aufgabe. Wie dabei das Problem der Einbeziehung des zentralen Aspektes der Bedeutung gelöst werden kann, sei dahingestellt. - Im achten Kapitel wird der Versuch unternommen, die zuvor diskutierten Punkte in ein IS&R-Forschungsprogramm (Prozesse - Verhalten - Systemfunktionalität - Performanz) umzusetzen, wobei auch einige kritische Anmerkungen zur bisherigen Forschungspraxis getroffen werden. - Das abschliessende neunte Kapitel fasst das Buch kurz zusammen und kann somit auch als Einstieg in dieThematik gelesen werden. Darauffolgen noch ein sehr nützliches Glossar zu allen wichtigen Begriffen, die in dem Buch Verwendung finden, eine Bibliographie und ein Sachregister. Ingwersen und Järvelin haben hier ein sehr anspruchsvolles und dennoch lesbares Buch vorgelegt. Die gebotenen Übersichtskapitel und Diskussionen sind zwar keine Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft, decken aber einen grossen Teil der heute in dieser Disziplin aktuellen und durch laufende Forschungsaktivitäten und Publikationen berührten Teilbereiche ab. Man könnte es auch - vielleicht ein wenig überspitzt - so formulieren: Was hier thematisiert wird, ist eigentlich die moderne Informationswissenschaft. Der Versuch, die beiden Forschungstraditionen zu vereinen, wird diesem Werk sicherlich einen Platz in der Geschichte der Disziplin sichern. Nicht ganz glücklich erscheint der Titel des Buches. "The Turn" soll eine Wende bedeuten, nämlich jene hin zu einer integrierten Sicht von IS und IR. Das geht vermutlich aus dem Untertitel besser hervor, doch dieser erschien den Autoren wohl zu trocken. Schade, denn "The Turn" gibt es z.B. in unserem Verbundkatalog bereits, allerdings mit dem Zusatz "from the Cold War to a new era; the United States and the Soviet Union 1983-1990". Der Verlag, der abgesehen davon ein gediegenes (wenn auch nicht gerade wohlfeiles) Produkt vorgelegt hat, hätte derlei unscharfe Duplizierend besser verhindert. Ungeachtet dessen empfehle ich dieses wichtige Buch ohne Vorbehalt zur Anschaffung; es sollte in keiner grösseren Bibliothek fehlen."