Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Davies, R.: Classification and ratiocination : a perennial quest (1986) 0.00
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = product of:
          0.009625752 = sum of:
            0.009625752 = weight(_text_:s in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009625752 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.262-289
  2. Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982) 0.00
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = product of:
          0.009625752 = sum of:
            0.009625752 = weight(_text_:s in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009625752 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 9(1982), S.27-29
  3. Sweeney, R.: ¬The development of the Dewey Decimal Classification (1983) 0.00
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = product of:
          0.009625752 = sum of:
            0.009625752 = weight(_text_:s in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009625752 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 39(1983) no.3, S.192-205
  4. Lehnus, D.J.: Book numbers : history, principles and applications (1980) 0.00
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = product of:
          0.009625752 = sum of:
            0.009625752 = weight(_text_:s in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009625752 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    IV,153 S
  5. Whitrow, M.: ¬An eighteenth-century faceted classification scheme (1983) 0.00
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = product of:
          0.009625752 = sum of:
            0.009625752 = weight(_text_:s in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009625752 = score(doc=3901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 39(1983) no.2, S.88-94
  6. Wimmer, F.: ¬Die internationale Dezimalklassifikation : Betrachtungen zu ihrer Entstehungsgeschichte und Aktualität (1985) 0.00
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = product of:
          0.008422533 = sum of:
            0.008422533 = weight(_text_:s in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008422533 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 29(1985) Nr.5, S.15-18
  7. Kleinschmidt, H.: Vom System zur Ordnung: Bemerkungen zu Bewertungen von Sachkatalogen vornehmlich im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert (1987) 0.00
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = product of:
          0.008422533 = sum of:
            0.008422533 = weight(_text_:s in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008422533 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Libri. 37(1987), S.126-159
  8. Miksa, F.L.: ¬The development of classification at the Library of Congress (1984) 0.00
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = product of:
          0.008422533 = sum of:
            0.008422533 = weight(_text_:s in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008422533 = score(doc=3407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    78 S
  9. Hunter, E.J.: ¬The United Kingdom contribution to subject cataloguing and classification since 1945 (1987) 0.00
    0.0021056333 = product of:
      0.0042112665 = sum of:
        0.0042112665 = product of:
          0.008422533 = sum of:
            0.008422533 = weight(_text_:s in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008422533 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing. 16(1987), S.31-34
  10. Arntz, H.: Universality of classification? : Keynote address (1982) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=49,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.31-40
  11. Rodriguez, R.D.: Kaiser's systematic indexing (1984) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=4521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 28(1984), S.163-174
  12. Satija, M.P.: History of book numbers (1987) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 1243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=1243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 14(1987), S.70-76
  13. Totok, W.: Wissensordnung und Ordnungswissen zwischen Renaissance und Aufklärung (1980) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 1433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=1433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.197-218
  14. Ranganathan, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories (1985) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=3631,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Among the theorists in the field of subject analysis in the twentieth century, none has been more influential than S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972) of India, a mathematician by training who turned to librarianship and made some of the most far-reaching contributions to the theory of librarianship in general and subject analysis in particular. Dissatisfied with both the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Universal Decimal Classification, Ranganathan set out to develop his own system. His Colon Classification was first published in 1933 and went through six editions; the seventh edition was in progress when Ranganathan died in 1972. In the course of developing the Colon Classification, Ranganathan formulated a body of classification theory which was published in numerous writings, of which the best known are Elements of Library Classification (1945; 3rd ed., 1962) and Prolegomena to Library Classification (1967). Among the principles Ranganathan established, the most powerful and influential are those relating to facet analysis. Ranganathan demonstrated that facet analysis (breaking down subjects into their component parts) and synthesis (recombining these parts to fit the documents) provide the most viable approach to representing the contents of documents. Although the idea and use of facets, though not always called by that name, have been present for a long time (for instance, in the Dewey Decimal Classification and Charles A. Cutter's Expansive Classification), Ranganathan was the person who systematized the ideas and established principles for them. For his Colon Classification, Ranganathan identified five fundamental categories: Personality (P), Material (M), Energy (E), Space (S) and Time (T) and the citation order PMEST based an the idea of decreasing concreteness.
    Footnote
    Original in: Ranganathan, S.R.: Elements of library classification. 3rd ed. Bombay: Asia Publishing House 1962. S.82-89
    Pages
    S.86-93
  15. Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985) 0.00
    0.0010420184 = product of:
      0.0020840368 = sum of:
        0.0020840368 = product of:
          0.0041680736 = sum of:
            0.0041680736 = weight(_text_:s in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041680736 = score(doc=3621,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
    Footnote
    Original in: Bliss, H.E.: A bibliographic classification extended by systematic auxuliary schedules for composite specification and notation. vols 1-2. 2nd ed. New York: Wilson 1952. S.3-11.
    Pages
    S.75-85
  16. Holiday, J.: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives (1989) 0.00
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
      0.0018048285 = sum of:
        0.0018048285 = product of:
          0.003609657 = sum of:
            0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003609657 = score(doc=971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.99-108
  17. Béthery, A.: Liberté bien ordonnée : les classifications encyclopédiques revues et corrigées (1988) 0.00
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
      0.0018048285 = sum of:
        0.0018048285 = product of:
          0.003609657 = sum of:
            0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003609657 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 33(1988) no.6, S.450-455
  18. Martel, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice (1985) 0.00
    8.508044E-4 = product of:
      0.0017016088 = sum of:
        0.0017016088 = product of:
          0.0034032175 = sum of:
            0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034032175 = score(doc=3623,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Library journal 36(1911) S.410,414-415.
    Pages
    S.71-74
  19. Hulme, E.W.: Principles of book classification (1985) 0.00
    8.508044E-4 = product of:
      0.0017016088 = sum of:
        0.0017016088 = product of:
          0.0034032175 = sum of:
            0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034032175 = score(doc=3626,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Library Association Record 13(1911) S.445-447.
    Pages
    S.48-51
  20. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985) 0.00
    8.508044E-4 = product of:
      0.0017016088 = sum of:
        0.0017016088 = product of:
          0.0034032175 = sum of:
            0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034032175 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
    Pages
    S.21-34